 | Brian Vickers - Electronic books - 2005 - 472 pages
...things are 'insensible' to the dead. His last point is equally specious, though with a grain of truth: 'But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it' - true sometimes, but not all honourable men are slandered, nor are all slanderers believed.... | |
 | Chris Coculuzzi, William Shakespeare, Matt Toner - 2005 - 56 pages
...hear it? MARLOWE (bubbling) No ... FALSTAFF Is it insensible, then? MARLOWE (boiling) N. . . FALSTAFF Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? MARLOWE (exploding) NO ! ! ! ! FALSTAFF Why? Detraction will not suffer it, therefore I'll none of... | |
 | Udo Bermbach, Hans Rudolf Vaget, Yvonne Nilges - Literature - 2006 - 406 pages
...reckoning! Who hath it? He that died a-Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon - and so ends my catechism. (V, l,... | |
 | Benjamin Ifor Evans - English literature - 2006 - 520 pages
...reckoning! Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. (Part I,... | |
 | Arthur Asa Berger - Language Arts & Disciplines - 2006 - 206 pages
...died a Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. 'Tis insensible Word* and Communication then? Yea, to the dead. But will [it] not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honor is a mere scutcheon — and so ends my catechism. Honor... | |
 | Charles Whitney - Drama - 2006 - 24 pages
...cannot benefit: "Who hath it? He that died o' Wednesday." It soon abandons the deserving dead anyway: "But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it." And, the overall sense implies, the pursuit of honor simply devalues die respect due to... | |
 | Chris Coculuzzi, Matt Toner - Sports - 2005 - 298 pages
...hear it? MARLOWE (bubbling) No... FALSTAFF Is it insensible, then? MARLOWE (boiling) N... FALSTAFF Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? MARLOWE (exploding) NO ! ! ! ! FALSTAFF Why? Detraction will not suffer it, therefore I'll none of... | |
 | Harry Turtledove - Fiction - 2007 - 460 pages
...Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. It is insensible then ? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living ? No. Why ? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it: honor is a mere scutcheon; and so ends my catechism. That would... | |
 | F. W. J. Schelling - Philosophy - 2012 - 244 pages
...reckoning! Who hath it? He that died oWednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? T'is insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honor is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism.14 With such... | |
| |
Wednesday. Doth he feel it ? No. Doth he hear it? No. Is it insensible then ? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living ? No. Why ? Detraction will not suffer it : — therefore I'll none of it: Honour is a mere 'scutcheon, and so ends my... 
