 Lastly, we are asked to hold the defendants' conference or association illegal, as being in restraint of trade. The term " illegal " here is a misleading one. Contracts, as they are called, in restraint of trade, are not, in my opinion, illegal in any...  Pacific Islands Pilot - Page 3241897Full view - About this book
 | Robert Riegel - Fire insurance - 1916 - 80 pages
...unenforceable."' In Harris vs. Commonwealth, the court quoted Mogul SS Co. vs. McGregor, as follows: "Contracts as they are called, in restraint of trade,...upon the contract a sufficient shelter to the public" (p. 563). Parties thereto cannot resort to the courts for enforcement or for redress against an associate.... | |
 | Herman Oliphant - Antitrust law - 1923 - 1114 pages
...are asked to hold the defendants' conference or association illegal, as being in restraint of trade. The term "illegal" here is a misleading one. Contracts,...it merely declines, after they have been made, to recognise their validity. The law considers the disadvantage so imposed upon the contract a sufficient... | |
 | Alpheus Thomas Mason - Labor laws and legislation - 1925 - 300 pages
...combination attempting to enforce that agreement became guilty of conspiracy. It will be recalled that this " "Contracts, as they are called, in restraint of trade,...they have been made to recognize their validity." Mogul Steamship Co. v. McGregor, App. Cas. (1892), 25, 34. See also Taft, WH, The Anti-Trust Act and... | |
 | Samuel Gompers - 1925 - 288 pages
...combination attempting to enforce that agreement became guilty of conspiracy. It will be recalled that this u "Contracts, as they are called, in restraint of trade,...they have been made to recognize their validity." Mogul Steamship Co. v. McGregor, App. Cas. (1892), 25, 34. See also Taft, WH, The Anti-Trust Act and... | |
 | Insurance law - 1895 - 964 pages
...were asked to hold the defendants' conference or association illegal, as being in restraint of trade. The term ' illegal,' here, is a misleading one. Contracts,...upon the contract a sufficient shelter to the public. The language of Crompton, J., in Hilton vs. Eckersley (6 El. & Bl., 47), is, I think, not to be supported.... | |
| |
