 | Rosemarie Rowley - Prose - 2002 - 171 pages
...love was over soon. CANTO 15 What is honour? A word What is that word honour? Air.. 'Tis insensible, then. Yea, to the dead But will it not live with the living? No. William Shakespeare Henry IV, Part 1 Act V Sc. 1 In the recesses of the bar, the mean And tawdry acolytes... | |
 | Sander L. Gilman - Literary Collections - 2004 - 330 pages
...Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. 'Tis insensible. then. Yea. to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. ilH4 5.i.i27-4i)... | |
 | Stephen Greenblatt - Biography & Autobiography - 2004 - 460 pages
...reckoning! Who hath it? He that died oWednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. Tis insensible then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. (1 Henry IV, 5.1.130-38) A few moments later, standing over the... | |
 | Madan M. Sauldie - Ethical problems - 2004 - 269 pages
...Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it". • One can be well-known - famous or infamous - without being... | |
 | George Ian Duthie - Art - 2005 - 216 pages
...Who hath it? he that died o" Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. (7 Henry... | |
 | Syd Pritchard - Golf - 2005 - 149 pages
...word. Who hath it? He that died o 'Wednesday. Doth hejeel it? No. Doth he hear it? No 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No . Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon. And so ends my catechism. [Henry... | |
 | Theodore Dreiser - Biography & Autobiography - 2004 - 1380 pages
.... . Who hath it?He that died a-Wednesday. Doth he feel it?No. Doth he hear it? No. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon — and so ends my catechism." 1 3.22... | |
 | F. H. Buckley - Law - 2003 - 264 pages
...Falstafl? Who hath it? He that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. . . . Therefore I'll none of it. ( 1 Henry fVV.i) High mimetic comedy may also deflate an over,the,top... | |
 | Brian Vickers - Electronic books - 2005 - 472 pages
...things are 'insensible' to the dead. His last point is equally specious, though with a grain of truth: 'But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it' - true sometimes, but not all honourable men are slandered, nor are all slanderers believed.... | |
 | Benjamin Ifor Evans - English literature - 2006 - 520 pages
...reckoning! Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. (Part I,... | |
| |
Wednesday. Doth he feel it ? No. Doth he hear it? No. Is it insensible then ? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living ? No. Why ? Detraction will not suffer it : — therefore I'll none of it: Honour is a mere 'scutcheon, and so ends my... 
