 | Madan M. Sauldie - Ethical problems - 2004 - 269 pages
...trim reckoning! Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not...the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it". • One can be well-known - famous or infamous - without being great or... | |
 | Stephen Greenblatt - Biography & Autobiography - 2004 - 460 pages
...trim reckoning! Who hath it? He that died oWednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. Tis insensible then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not...the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. (1 Henry IV, 5.1.130-38) A few moments later, standing over the corpse of... | |
 | Sander L. Gilman - Literary Collections - 2004 - 330 pages
...trim reckoning! Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. 'Tis insensible. then. Yea. to the dead. But will it not...the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. ilH4 5.i.i27-4i) Thus.... | |
 | George Ian Duthie - Art - 2005 - 216 pages
...trim reckoning! Who hath it? he that died o" Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not...the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. (7 Henry IV, V, i,... | |
 | Theodore Dreiser - Biography & Autobiography - 2004 - 1380 pages
...that honour?. . . Who hath it?He that died a-Wednesday. Doth he feel it?No. Doth he hear it? No. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not...the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon — and so ends my catechism." 1 3.22 Mr. Ellsworth... | |
 | Syd Pritchard - Golf - 2005 - 149 pages
...honour? A word. Who hath it? He that died o 'Wednesday. Doth hejeel it? No. Doth he hear it? No 'Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not...the living? No . Why? Detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon. And so ends my catechism. [Henry IV Pt.I Vi... | |
 | Brian Vickers - Electronic books - 2005 - 472 pages
...things are 'insensible' to the dead. His last point is equally specious, though with a grain of truth: 'But will it not live with the living? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it' - true sometimes, but not all honourable men are slandered, nor are all slanderers believed. So for... | |
 | F. H. Buckley - Law - 2003 - 264 pages
...asked Falstafl? Who hath it? He that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? no. . . . Therefore I'll none of it. ( 1 Henry fVV.i) High mimetic comedy may also deflate an over,the,top... | |
 | Chris Coculuzzi, William Shakespeare, Matt Toner - 2005 - 56 pages
...hear it? MARLOWE (bubbling) No ... FALSTAFF Is it insensible, then? MARLOWE (boiling) N. . . FALSTAFF Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living? MARLOWE (exploding) NO ! ! ! ! FALSTAFF Why? Detraction will not suffer it, therefore I'll none of... | |
 | Benjamin Ifor Evans - English literature - 2006 - 520 pages
...trim reckoning! Who hath it? he that died o' Wednesday. Doth he feel it? no. Doth he hear it? no. Tis insensible, then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not...the living? no. Why? detraction will not suffer it. Therefore I'll none of it. Honour is a mere scutcheon: and so ends my catechism. (Part I, VI) »»f^MMigT3... | |
| |
Wednesday. Doth he feel it? No. Doth he hear it? No. Is it insensible then? Yea, to the dead. But will it not live with the living ? No. Why? Detraction will not suffer it :— therefore I'll none of it : Honour is a mere scutcheon, and so ends my catechism. 
