 So, in every case, where a statute enacts, or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a person, he shall have a remedy upon the same statute for the thing enacted for his advantage, or for the recompense of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law.  The Pacific Reporter - Page 2111913Full view - About this book
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1894 - 956 pages
...by statute. Williame v. Chicago <£• A. It. Co. 135111. 491, 11: 352 10. When a statute commands or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a person, he shall have a remedy upon it for the thing enacted for his advantage, or for a wrong done to him contrary to its terms. Pauley... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1895 - 1242 pages
...remedy which by law is properly applicable to that right or obligation follows as an incident. * * * In every case where a statute enacts or prohibits...the recompense of a wrong done to him contrary to said law." Add. Torts (6th Ed.) 75. "It is well settled that a public officer or other person who takes... | |
 | Edwin Ames Jaggard - Torts - 1895 - 700 pages
...statute under consideration must be carefully regarded. Where the statute provides no penalty, and merely "enacts or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a...recompense of a wrong done to him contrary to the said law."3*0 "Where a penaltyis created by statute, and nothing is said as to who may recover it, and it... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1895 - 1198 pages
...obligation follows as an Incident. * * * In every case where a statute enacts or prohibits a tiling for the benefit of a person, he shall have a remedy...the recompense of a wrong done to him contrary to eaid law." Add. Torts (6th Ed.) 75. "It 18 well settled that a public officer or other person who takes... | |
 | Thomas Beven - Negligence - 1895 - 1072 pages
...statute : see 2 Inst. p. 486, and in Com. Dig. tit. Action upon Statute, P, it is laid down that ' in every case where a statute enacts or prohibits a thing for the benefit 1 17 QR 34. a Where a special remedy is pointed out, which it is impossible to resort to, then the... | |
 | New York (State). Supreme Court. Appellate Division - Law reports, digests, etc - 1905 - 778 pages
...case is that stated by Judge FINCH in Pauley v. SG & L. Co. (131 NT 90, 95) : "When a statute commands or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a person he...statute for the thing enacted for his advantage, or for a wrong done to him contrary to its terms " (citing Willy v. Mulledy, 78 NY 310, and see Marino v.... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1896 - 922 pages
...such factories, and intended for their protection, and the rule applies that when a statute commands or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a person he...statute for the thing enacted for his advantage, or for a wrong done to him contrary to its terms." See also Willy v. Multedy, 78 NY 310, 34 Am. Uep. 536.... | |
 | Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1896 - 1072 pages
...factories, and intended for their protection, and the rule applies *** that when a statute commands or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a person,...upon the same statute for the thing enacted for his benefit, or for a wrong done him contrary to its terms": See, also, Willy T. Mulledy, 78 NY 310; 34... | |
 | Tennessee. Supreme Court, William Wilcox Cooke, Joseph Brown Heiskell, Jere Baxter, Benjamin James Lea, George Wesley Pickle, Charles Theodore Cates, Frank Marian Thompson, Charles Le Sueur Cornelius, Roy Hood Beeler - Law reports, digests, etc - 1896 - 824 pages
...adjudged in other States, and is well settled upon principle. it is laid down in Comyn's' Digest "that, in every case where a statute enacts or prohibits a thing for the benefit of a person, ho shall have a remedy upon .the same statute for the thing enacted for his advantage or for the recompense... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1899 - 914 pages
...benefit and protection of individuals. It is well settled that, when a statute commands or prohibit« a thing for the benefit of a person, he shall have...upon the same statute for the thing enacted for his benefit, or for a wrong done him contrary to its terms. Queen v. Dai/ton Coal Л I. Co. 95 Tenu. 463,... | |
| |
