...This property then comes under the dominion of him who created it. Such ownership 'excludes the common right of other men: for this labour being the unquestionable...where there is enough, and as good, left in common for others'.17 Locke thus had created a conception of private property from what had been held in common....

...his labour with, and joined to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his property . . . for this labour being the unquestionable property...where there is enough, and as good, left in common for others.5 This is the so-called Lockean proviso, which is the forerunner of the Nozickian proviso, of...

...excludes the common right of other men. For this labor being the unquestionable property of the laborer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once...and as good left in common for others. 28. He that is nourished by the acorns he picked up under an oak, or the apples he gathered from the trees in the...

...state Nature placed it in, it hath by this hibour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other Men. For this Labour being the unquestionable...no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others." 34 KRAMER, Matthew...

...state Nature placed it in, it hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other Men. For this labour being the unquestionable...no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others. . . . Thus this Law...

...state nature placed it in, it hath by this labour something annexed to it that excludes the common right of other men. For this labour being the unquestionable...no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined.9 [Emphasis added] The above serves only as a starting point. Locke applies his theory only...

...state Nature placed it in, it hath by this labour something annexed to it, that excludes the common right of other Men. For this Labour being the unquestionable...of the Labourer, no Man but he can have a right to 94 Hamilton (n 78 above) 867. 95 In Millar v Taylor the court applies a natural law theory to copyright...

...his Labour with, and joyned to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his Property. . . For this Labour being the un-questionable Property...no Man but he can have a right to what that is once joyned to, at least where there is enough and as good left in common for others.162 Viewed independently...

...their children. Yet we do not mistake children for property. Of course children are not "things".' unquestionable property of the labourer, no man but he can have a right to what that is once joined to...2wl (Italics in the original) Locke's statement could be a foundation for a property right in...

...his Labour with, and joyned to it something that is his own, and thereby makes it his Property. ... at least where there is enough, and as good left in common for others. Locke limited the individual rights that arose in this manner, not only with his now- famous proviso...