The Southern Review, Volume 6A. E. Miller., 1830 |
From inside the book
Results 6-10 of 85
Page 181
... supreme law of the land , any thing in the Constitution or laws of any State ... Court is the proper and regularly constituted tribunal to decide all ... Supreme Court , and such inferior Courts as Congress may from time to time order and ...
... supreme law of the land , any thing in the Constitution or laws of any State ... Court is the proper and regularly constituted tribunal to decide all ... Supreme Court , and such inferior Courts as Congress may from time to time order and ...
Page 182
... Supreme Court , and not to the 25th section of the judi- ciary act , which we think , by a dangerous stretch of power , has given an unlimited jurisdiction over all State laws , to the mere discretion of the Court - by which usurpation ...
... Supreme Court , and not to the 25th section of the judi- ciary act , which we think , by a dangerous stretch of power , has given an unlimited jurisdiction over all State laws , to the mere discretion of the Court - by which usurpation ...
Page 183
... Supreme Court , the political pow- ers of an Aulic Assembly . In the deliberations of the Con- vention it was at one time proposed to confer on the Senate , the power of sovereign arbitration between the States and Ge- neral Government ...
... Supreme Court , the political pow- ers of an Aulic Assembly . In the deliberations of the Con- vention it was at one time proposed to confer on the Senate , the power of sovereign arbitration between the States and Ge- neral Government ...
Page 184
... Supreme Court . We apprehend , that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over the reserved rights of the States , which no more belong to the compact , than one of the Swiss Cantons is a member of this confederacy . If a State ...
... Supreme Court . We apprehend , that the Supreme Court has no jurisdiction over the reserved rights of the States , which no more belong to the compact , than one of the Swiss Cantons is a member of this confederacy . If a State ...
Page 185
... Supreme Court neither is in right , nor ought in fact to be the final and sole interpreter of the compact , what then ? Mr. Webster , in making out his case of insuperable difficulty , says- " In Carolina , the tariff is a palpable ...
... Supreme Court neither is in right , nor ought in fact to be the final and sole interpreter of the compact , what then ? Mr. Webster , in making out his case of insuperable difficulty , says- " In Carolina , the tariff is a palpable ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
admit Alexandrian Alexandrine ancient appears appellate jurisdiction Aristotle authority Bonaparte cause character citizens clause common compact Congress considered Constitution Convention declare deluges doctrine doubt duties edition Eusebius exclusive exercise existence express Fabr favour Federal Federalist feeling foreign France French friends give Greek Griesbach happiness honour inferior interest Isocrates Jonson Josephine judges judicial power judiciary justice labour legislature liberty limestone Louis XIV Madame Madison manuscripts means ment mind moral nature never Nolan object observations old red sandstone opinion original parties philosophy phrenology Plato political possess present preserved principles protection purpose Pythagoras question reason remarkable rendered resolution says shew society South-Carolina Southern Review sovereign sovereignty strata supposed Supreme Court tariff tariff of 1824 Testament thing tion treaty tribunals Union United usurpation versions violation Virginia Volpone votes Vulgate Webster whole words
Popular passages
Page 166 - That the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers; but that, as in all other cases of compact among parties having no common judge, each party has an equal right to judge for itself, as well of infractions, as of the mode and measure of redress.
Page 164 - ... in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states, who are the parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose, for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights, and liberties appertaining to them...
Page 100 - I loved the man, and do honour his memory, on this side idolatry, as much as any. He was (indeed) honest, and of an open and free nature; had an excellent phantasy, brave notions, and gentle expressions...
Page 115 - O gentle sleep, Nature's soft nurse, how have I frighted thee, That thou no more wilt weigh my eyelids down, And steep my senses in forgetfulness...
Page 176 - ... limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting that compact, as no further valid than they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact ; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact, the states, who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose, for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining, within their respective limits, the authorities, rights,...
Page 165 - States are parties, as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting that compact; as no further valid than they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact ; and that, in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers not granted by the said compact, the States, who are parties thereto, have the right and are in duty bound to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits the authorities,...
Page 440 - On the other hand, it is perfectly clear, that the sovereign powers vested in the state governments by their respective constitutions remained unaltered and unimpaired, except so far as they were granted to the government of the United States.
Page 169 - With whom do they repose this ultimate right of deciding on the powers of the government ? Sir, they have settled all this in the fullest manner.
Page 180 - That to this compact each State acceded as a State, and is an integral party, its co-States forming, as to itself, the other party : That the government created by this compact was not made the exclusive or final judge of the extent of the powers delegated to itself; since that would have made its discretion, and not the Constitution, the measure of its powers...
Page 170 - Who made you a judge over another's servants ? To their own masters they stand or fall.