Page images

Notwithstanding this, Barrow's De. monftrations are so very short, and are involv'd in so many Notes and Symboles, that they are renderd obfcure and difficult to one not vers'd in Geometry. There are many Propositions which appear conspicu. ous in reading Euclid himself, are made knotty and scarcely intelligible to Learners by this Algebraical way of Demonstrations as is, for Example, Prop. 13. Book 1 And the Demonstrations which he lays down in Book 2. are still more difficult : Euclid himself has done much better, in Shewing their Evidence by the Contemplations of Figures, as in Geometry should always be done. The Elements of all Sciences ought to be handled after the most simple Method, and not to be involved in Symboles, Notes, or obscure Principles, taken elsewhere.

As Barrow's Elements are too short, fo are those of Clavius too prolix, abounding in fuperfluous Scholiums and Comments: For in my opinion, Euclid is not so obfcure as to want such a number of Notes, neither do. I doubt but a Learner will find Euclid himself, cafier than any of his Com

A4 mentators

memtators. As too much Brevity in Geometrical Demonstrations begets Obfcurity, So too much Prolixity produces Tediousness and Confusion.

On these Accounts principally, it was that I undertook to publish the first fix Books of Euclid, with the 11th and 12th, according to Commandinus's Edition ; the rest: I forbore, because those first mention’d are sufficient for understanding of most parts of the Mathematicks now ftudied,

Farther, for the Use of those who are desirous to apply the Elements of Geometry to Uses in Life, we have added a Compendium of Plain aud Spherical Trigonometry, by means whereof Geometrical Magnitudes are measured, and their Die mensions expressed in Numbers.


[ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

R.KEIL, in his Preface,

hath fufficiently declar'd D

how much easier, plainer, and eleganter, the Elements of Geometry written by

Euclid are, than those written by others; and that the Elements themselves, are fitter for a Learner, than


those publish’dby such as have pretended to Comment on, Symbolize, or Transpose any of his Demonstrations of such Propositions as they intended to treat of. Then how must a. Geometrician be amaz'd, when he meets with a Tract * of the 1st, 2d, 3d, 4th, 5th,6th, 11th and 12th Books of the Elements, in which are omitted the Demonstrations of all the Propositions of that most noble universal Mathefis, the 5th; on which the 6th, 11th, and 12th so much depend, that the Demonstration of not so much as one Proposition in them can be obtain'd without those in the 5th.

The 7th, Sth, and oth Books treat of fuch Properties of Numbers which are necessary for the Demonftrations of the Ioth, which treats of Incommensurables; and 'the 13th, 14th, and 15th, of the five Platonick Bodies. But though the Doctrine of Incommensurables, because expounded in one and the same Plane, as the first fix Elements were, clam'd by a Right of Order, to be handled before Planes intersected by Planes, cr the more compounded Doctrine of Solids, and the Properties of Numbers were necessary to the Reasoning about Incommensurables: T!


[merged small][ocr errors]

Yet because only one Proposition of these four Books, viz. the ist of the Icth is

quoted in the with and 12th Books; and that only once, viz. in the Demonstration of the 2d of the 12th, and that ist Proposition of the roth, is supplied by a Lemma in the 12th: And because the 7th, 8th, 9th, Ioth, 13th, 14th, 15th Books have not been thought (by our greatest Masters) necessary to be read by such as design to make natural Philosophy their Study, or by such as would apply Geometry to practical Affairs, Dr. Keil in his Edition, gave us only these eight Books, viz. the first fix, and the 11th and 12th.

And as he found there was wanting a Treatise of these parts of the Elements, as they were written by Euclid himfelf; he publish'd his Edition without omitting any

of Euclid's Demonstrations, except two; one of which was a second Demonftration of the 9th Propofition of the third Book; the other a Demonstration of that Property of Proportionals calld Converfion, (contain'd in a Corollary to the 19th Propofition of the 5th Book,) where instead of Euclid's Demonstration, which is universal, most Authors have given us only particular ones of their own. The first of these which was omitted is here


[ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »