Page images
PDF
EPUB

. 5. Qu. (35) answered by Mr. Bruster. In printing this question an error has crept into the enunciation by substituting the word digits for numbers, After rectifying this error the solution may be as follows:

Let a? be the given square, and x the less number; then, a’ — x will be the greater. But, by hypothesis,

a
x

al a — 2x = va? = a, and e- 2x + 3 = 20 = ~--23 = a; in each of these equations =5" = the less number, and is the greater. Hence, if the given square be 1, the required numbers are 1 and 3 ; to the given square 4, the numbers are 3 and 6, &c.

By assuming data to render the question possible, answers to this question were transmitted by Messrs. Baines, Dunn, Ford, Hine, Hirst, Maffett, Nesbit, Rylando, Tomlinson, and Winward.

6. Qu. (36) answered by Lucinda and Rylando. Let x, y, and z, denote the numbers required, and let a= their sum; then, by the question x ty —%= a’ -- 22 = 02 by assumption, also x + %-y=u? – 2y = n, and y + x - x = a’ – 2x = mạ; hence, r = ai m

n? , a' _ 0? , y="7", and z="5"; therefore, x+ _3a’ — m

-n?—? = a’, or by reduction,

n — 702 a* = + m + v?, which assume = (ints)' = mit

_n? +0? —-g? 2ms +s?; then 2ms =n’ + 02 — s? and m=Take n = 4, v = 6, and s = 2; then m= 12, and a'196 = 14', x = 26, y = 90, and 2 = 80. Otherwise by Mr. J. Hine and Mr. Muffett, Plymouth.

Let x, y, and z, be the three numbers required, then, by the question, x +y +z = a’, x+y-z=c?, to

y=d, and y + x - x = e’; now by adding the three last equations, we get x + y + x = c + di te,

[ocr errors]

y +z =

2

which must be a square, because its equal a? is a square; to make c + d + e a square, assume it equal (6 + d): = c + 2cd + d, from whence c or d may be found, viz. c=57; where e and d may be any numbers at pleasure, so that ez be but divisible by 2d. Take e = 64, and d = 2, then c= 16, consequently a = 324 is a square, and by subtracting the three last equations severally from the first, we obtain z= a? -c

a? d oy - 25

2 , and the three numbers are 34, 130, and 160, which answer the conditions of the question.

[ocr errors]

2

[ocr errors]

Again by Messrs. Ford, Putsey, and Winward. Put x, y, and z, for the numbers required, and by the question we have x + y —% = a’, x +%-y=b?, and y + % -- x = c; the sum of these three equations gives x + y +z = a + b + c?, which is also to be a square, by the question; assume it = (a + n)2 = a + 2an + n°, and we find a = (b + c _no) • 2n, where b, c, and n may be any numbers at pleasure. Let n = 2,b= 8, and c= 10, then a=40, and if from the fourth equation we subtract the three first severally, we obFb = 832, y = "= 850, and 2 =

2 b2 + c

= 82, which are three numbers that will an2 swer, and other answers may be found by taking other even numbers for n, b, and c.

It was answered also by Anglicus, Mr. Baines, Mr. Gawthrop, Mr. Hirst, Mr. Nesbit, and Mr. Tomlinson.

tain r

[ocr errors]

7. Qu. (37) answered by Mr. Nesbit, Farnle:'. Let x?, 25x2, and 49x2 denote the numbers sought, then the sum of their square roots is = 137, which is to be both a square and a cube by the question ; put13r = pó, and we have x = ?n, where if p = 13, we find x = 135 = 137858491849, 25.ro = 3446462296225,

and 49x2 = 6755066100601, which answer the condi. tions required.

It was answered in exactly the same manner by Messrs. Anglicus, Baines, Ford, Gawthrop, Hine, Hirsi, Lucinda, Maffett, Putsey, Rylando, Tomlinson, and Wirts ward.

8. Qu. (38) answered by Rylando, and Mr. A. Hirst.

Let the roots of the required squares be denoted by 1 x and x; then by the question (1 x)2 + x = x

+1xt to, and x x + 1, are squares, and we have only to make (1–2): — x = } -a square; assume

it = n°; then s="<", and 1—-=+**; where

n may be taken at pleasure, provided it be less than unity. Ifn= , then x=band -x=yt; when n = }, then x = and = id; and so on.

Otherwise by Mr. Winward. Put x and 16-{ x + x2 for the numbers required, which are obviously squares; then - {x+x+ x = x + { x + to = (x + 1): also x2 + (1-x) = g?

ste= (x - 1)”; it only remains then to make *-+ 22 - 2 = 1 { x, a square. Put 1as for its root, then 1 - x=(1 - ux) = 15 4x + a+x+, and x="0 ; where a may be any whole number greater than 2. Take a = 4, then x? = 717 and 1 - *x + x2 = tala, two numbers which an. swer the conditions of the question.

And according to one or the other of these methods it was answered by Messrs. Anglicus, Baines, Brooke, Gawthrop, Hine, Maffett, Nesbit, Patsey, and Tomlinson.

9. Qu. (39). We have not received two solutions to this question in which the resulting numbers are exactly the same;

the difference arises from our correspondents not all making use of the same table of the sun's declination, and also from some of them allowing for refraction, &c. and others not.

Solution by Mr. A. Hirst, of Marsden. In the oblique angled spherical triangle PZS we have PZ=36°45' the co-lat. ZS= 65° 32' the co-alt. :/ (allowing 2' for re- 714 / In 1098 fraction) and PS= S

Z H 83°40' the co-declination, to find the < P - 56° 46'56"; hence the time of observation was Sh. 47m. 8s. P. M. Again, his azimuth or the 2 PZS = 114° 0' 12''; therefore the declination of the wall is 24° 0' 12'' easterly: Draw PH perp. to SZ produced ; then in the right angled spherical trian. we have ZP, PZH, and the right angle, to find HP, the height of the style — 33° 7' 58"; and H Z the distance of the substyle from the meridian = 16° 53' 49", and the angle HP Z = the plane's difference of longitude = 29° 3' 47".

For the distance of the hour lines; rad. : sin. PH= 33° 7' 58" :: tang. HP11: tang. H 11 = 7° 47' 47'' = the distance of the hour line eleven from the substyle. In the same manner all the rest may be found, and have been actually calculated by all who answered it; we, however, deem it unnecessary to insert them, as they would take up a great deal of room, and are on the whole useless.

Very nearly as above, the question was answered by Mr. Baines, I. B. of Lincoln, Mr. Gurthrop, Mr. Hine, Mr. Maffett, Mr. Nesbit, Rylando, Mr. Tomlinson, and Mr. Winward.

10. Qu. (40) answered by Mr. Whitley, Rotheram.

Let ADB be the given semi-circle, A the extremity of the arc from whence the motion cominences, D and C any two . contemporary positions of A GF C

B the bodies, D C the line connecting them, and E their common centre of gravity, which, since the bodies are égual, will be in the middle of DC, or DE= EC. · Draw DG, EF perp. to A B, and put the rad. AO=

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

rm

r, arc AD = %, A F = r, and G D = y; then, by the question, the arc ADB : AB :: arc AD-:AC:: 1.5708 : 1 :: 1:1=15708 = m (suppose) then AC = mz, hence FC = FG = mz— r, and AG = 2r — mz = AO-GO-r-V (? — 4); therefore x = 1 $mz +įr-(r? — y'), and, taking the fluxions, we get i = { mż tu

(r= = y).

; but from the nature of the circle, z =

7 (72 —-y?) whic

, which substituted above, we shall have =- }(mrj +yj

, and the fluxion of the

V (P2 - y2); an area A FE = { yi (because FE = {y) = x rmy j + y’j (n = 7:)); the conte

-), the correct fluent of which ist

(p? — y') which when y = r becomes m 18+ 4x1.5708)

w;1.5703 1- ) = 2 x .3555, the double of which is = m2 x .711 in this case 1777į square yards = the area of the space A EBA, which taken from 3927, the area of the semi-circle ADB, leaves 2149yards for the area of AEBDA.

Note. The length of the curve is found in page 251, No. 13, Math. Companion : and scarcely different from the above were the solutions sent by Messrs. Hine, Maffett, Rylando, Tomlinson, and Winward.

A very neat solution was also sent by Mr. Gawthrop, which we are sorry we have not room for. Other an. swers were sent by Messrs. Anglicus, Brooke, and Nesbit.

11. Qu. (41) Answered by Mr. Nesbit, Farnley.

In the annexed figure let T 1 NB denote the tree, A, B, and C, A, the points in the circumference of the field defined by the extremities of the shadows, and

By well known rules in spherics we find the sun's azi. muth from the north at the time of the first observation =

« PreviousContinue »