Political and Legal Remedies for War |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 46
Page
... change of cha- racter . • 8 • • 16 • • 17 3. The progress of civilization is antagonistic to War . 4. Economic facts , newly recognised , are against it 5. Public sentiment is increasingly influenced by- ( 1 ) Diffusion of education ...
... change of cha- racter . • 8 • • 16 • • 17 3. The progress of civilization is antagonistic to War . 4. Economic facts , newly recognised , are against it 5. Public sentiment is increasingly influenced by- ( 1 ) Diffusion of education ...
Page 4
... change in International Law , or on that of giving increased definiteness and validity to a rule of law which has hitherto been imperfectly appre- ( 1 ) To mitigate hended and recognised . These aims are ( 1 ) mitigation of severity in ...
... change in International Law , or on that of giving increased definiteness and validity to a rule of law which has hitherto been imperfectly appre- ( 1 ) To mitigate hended and recognised . These aims are ( 1 ) mitigation of severity in ...
Page 7
... ' Constitutional History , vol . I. , pp . 179–183 . + See Ward's History of the Law of Nations , vol . II . , pp . 21-23 . Change in the character of War . 2. Again , POSSIBILITY OF ABOLITION OF WAR . 7 State of International PAGE.
... ' Constitutional History , vol . I. , pp . 179–183 . + See Ward's History of the Law of Nations , vol . II . , pp . 21-23 . Change in the character of War . 2. Again , POSSIBILITY OF ABOLITION OF WAR . 7 State of International PAGE.
Page 8
... changes in its most distinguishing features . It is hardly possible to embrace under the same name the sort of ... change of cha- racter.
... changes in its most distinguishing features . It is hardly possible to embrace under the same name the sort of ... change of cha- racter.
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
actual alleged Alliance Arbitration army Article Austria become Belgium belligerent Britain Canal causes Christian circumstances citizens civilised commercial common condition conduct Conference Congress considerations constitution Crimean War Declaration Declaration of Paris diplomatic dispute doctrine doubt duty effect engaged England Europe European evils Executive Government exemption existence fact favour force Foreign France Franco-German War Germany Government grounds guarantee Holy Alliance honour humanity independence influence institutions interests International Law Intervention Ionian Islands Italy kind Laws of War limits Lord Majesty's Government matter ment military mode modern moral national Law Neutralisation Neutrality object occasion organisation pacific party passions persons political popular population possible practice present principles private property property at sea purpose question recognised relations remedies respect result rules Russia schemes sentiments side sort statesmen territory tion trade Treaty of Paris Treaty of Vienna true Vienna warfare Wars whole wholly
Popular passages
Page 315 - That this object would be exceeded by the employment of arms which uselessly aggravate the sufferings of disabled men, or render their death inevitable ; That the employment of such arms would, therefore, be contrary to the laws of humanity; The Contracting Parties engage mutually to renounce, in case of war among themselves, the employment by their military or naval troops of any projectile of a weight below 400 grammes, which is either explosive or charged with fulminating or inflammable substances.
Page 208 - V. The contracting parties further engage, that when the said canal shall have been completed, they will protect it from interruption, seizure, or unjust confiscation, and that they will guarantee the neutrality thereof, so that the said canal may forever be open and free, and the capital invested therein secure.
Page 208 - ... with reference to any means of communication by ship-canal which may be constructed between the Atlantic and Pacific Oceans by the way of the river San Juan de Nicaragua, and either or both of the lakes of Nicaragua or Managua, to any port or place on the Pacific Ocean, the President of the United States has conferred full powers on John M.
Page 219 - The Grand Duchy of Luxemburg, within the limits determined by the Act annexed to the treaties of the 19th of April, 1839, under the guarantee of the Courts of Great Britain, Austria, France, Prussia, and Russia, shall henceforth form a perpetually neutral State. " It shall be bound to observe the same neutrality towards all other States.
Page 209 - The governments of the United States and Great Britain, having not only desired, in entering into this convention, to accomplish a particular object, but also to establish a general principle, they hereby agree to extend their protection, by treaty stipulations, to any other practicable communications, whether by canal or railway, across the isthmus which connects North and South America, and especially to the inter-oceanic communications, should the same prove to be practicable, whether by canal...
Page 210 - In consideration of these concessions, in order to secure the construction and permanence of the route or road herein contemplated, and also to secure, for the benefit of mankind, the uninterrupted advantages of such communication from sea to sea, the United States recognizes the rights of sovereignty and property of Honduras in and over the line...
Page 206 - ... the ancient rule of his Empire, and in virtue of which it has, at all times, been prohibited for the Ships of War of Foreign Powers to enter the Straits of the Dardanelles and of the Bosphorus; and that, so long as the Porte is at Peace, His Majesty will admit no Foreign Ship of War into the said Straits.
Page 315 - That the only legitimate object which States should endeavour to accomplish during war is to weaken the military forces of the enemy...
Page 340 - Prisoners of war may be employed on certain public works which have no immediate connection with the operations on the theatre of war, provided the employment be not excessive, nor humiliating to their military rank, if they belong to the army, or to their official or social position, if they do not belong to it.
Page 339 - Art. 23. Prisoners of war are lawful and disarmed enemies. They are in the power of the enemy's government, but not of the individuals or of the corps who made them prisoners. They should be treated with humanity. Every act of insubordination authorizes the necessary measures of severity to be taken with regard to them. All their personal effects except their arms are considered to be their own property.