History of the Discovery of America, of the Landing of Our Forefathers at Plymouth, and of Their Most Remarkable Engagements with the Indians in New-England: From Their First Landing in 1620 Until the Final Subjugation of the Natives in 1679 : to which is Annexed, the Defeat of Generals Braddock, Harmer & St. Clair by the Indians at the Westward, &c
Results 1-5 of 13
At length he arrived at a very large island , and as he had taken seven of the
natives of San Salvador or board , he learned from them it was called Cuba , but
he gave it the name of Juanna . He next proceeded to an island which he called ...
The prisoners taken were divided among the troops , some of whom were
retained by them as servants and the remainder sent to the West - Indies and
sold to the plan . ters - - the prisoners reported that the whole tribe of Pe . quots
was now ...
The victory was complete - about 50 of the Narragansets were killed and a much
greater number wounded and taken prisoners ; among the latter was a brother of
MIANTINOMI and two of the sons of CANONI . CUS , whom Uncus conducted in ...
they should restore to Uncus all the captives and canoca which they had taken
from him , and pledge themselves to maintain perpetual peace with the English
and their allies , and to the former pay an annual tribu . e of 2000 fathom of white
... this Indian had been taken into favour by the Rev . Mr . ELLIOT , by whom he
had been taught to read and write , and became much attached to the English .
The Governor upon receiving the important information relative to the hostile
What people are saying - Write a review
Great as a historical reference. Mind you, the context is in reference to the subsequent colonization of America. Today it is evidential that "discovery" was made by Henry Sinclair almost 100 yrs. prior. Of course, I am bias due to that I am a descendent of Henry. On the other hand, I do not like the intent by which war was waged for occupation of the new world. I am sure there was blood on the hands of everyone involved, for this it is necessary to readdress the original issue of suzerainty. I am sure there could be issue with the fact that through the only route possible, since the denial of Scottish sovereignty, was cut off and this is due to divine sovereignty. So, if we can contest he War of King Phillip I am sure we would find that a far less incursion of native Americans would have been possible with a sustained introduction of immigrants. First of all, the assumption of the discovery of a new Indies trades route was simply and speculation.