History of the Discovery of America, of the Landing of Our Forefathers at Plymouth, and of Their Most Remarkable Engagements with the Indians in New-England: From Their First Landing in 1620 Until the Final Subjugation of the Natives in 1679 : to which is Annexed, the Defeat of Generals Braddock, Harmer & St. Clair by the Indians at the Westward, &c
Results 1-5 of 13
The prisoners taken were divided among the troops , some of whom were
retained by them as servants and the remainder sent to the West - Indies and
sold to the plan . ters - - the prisoners reported that the whole tribe of Pe . quots
was now ...
The victory was complete - about 50 of the Narragansets were killed and a much
greater number wounded and taken prisoners ; among the latter was a brother of
MIANTINOMI and two of the sons of CANONI . CUS , whom Uncus conducted in ...
that soon after a warm dispute arose between them , re . lative to the prisoners ,
each claiming the women for their squaws ( or wives ) that they at length
proceeded to blows , and after beating each other for some time with clubs , it
was agreed ...
Ea a party of Indians near Lancaster , they killed fifty of them , and took between
fifty and sixty of their squaws and children prisoners - Capi . Henchman on his
way to Brookfield discovered the dead bodies of several of his * * * countrymen
COTT humanly in . terfered in their behalf , and made prisoners of the few that
remained alive ; - among the latter was their leader , a squaw , commonly termed
the queen of Narraganset ; and among them an active young fellow who begged
What people are saying - Write a review
Great as a historical reference. Mind you, the context is in reference to the subsequent colonization of America. Today it is evidential that "discovery" was made by Henry Sinclair almost 100 yrs. prior. Of course, I am bias due to that I am a descendent of Henry. On the other hand, I do not like the intent by which war was waged for occupation of the new world. I am sure there was blood on the hands of everyone involved, for this it is necessary to readdress the original issue of suzerainty. I am sure there could be issue with the fact that through the only route possible, since the denial of Scottish sovereignty, was cut off and this is due to divine sovereignty. So, if we can contest he War of King Phillip I am sure we would find that a far less incursion of native Americans would have been possible with a sustained introduction of immigrants. First of all, the assumption of the discovery of a new Indies trades route was simply and speculation.