Page images
PDF
EPUB
[merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small][merged small]
[ocr errors]

&c.

[ocr errors]

7}

a + x 2

ax

or its equal

(a + x) (a2 — x2)", into an infinite series.

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

5x7

+

&c.

3x4 3x5 5x6 Ans. 1++ + + + +

α 2a2 2a3 8a4 8a5 16ασ 16a7

OF THE INDETERMINATE ANALYSIS.

In the common rules of Algebra, such questions are usually proposed as require some certain or definite answer; in which case it is necessary that there should be as many independent equations, expressing their conditions, as there are unknown quantities to be determined; or otherwise the problem would not be limited.

But in other branches of the science, questions frequently arise that involve a greater number of unknown quantities than there are equations to express them; in which instances they are called indeterminate or unlimited problems, being such as usually admit of an indefinite number of solutions; although, when the question is proposed in integers, and the answers are required only in whole positive numbers, they are, in some cases, confined within certain limits, and in others the problem may become impossible.

PROBLEM 1.—To find the integral values of the unknown quantities x and y in the equation

ax by ±c,
c, or ax + by = c.

Where a and b are supposed to be given whole numbers, which admit of no common divisor, except when it is also a divisor of c.

RULE 1.—Let wh denote a whole, or integral number; and reduce the equation to the form

[blocks in formation]

2. Throw all whole numbers out of that of these two expressions, to which the question belongs, so that the numbers d and e, in the remaining parts, may be each less than a; then

dy±e

e dy

wh, or

wh.

a

a

3. Take such a multiple of one of these last formulæ, corresponding with that abovementioned, as will make the coefficient of y nearly equal to a, and throw the whole numbers out of it as before.

ay
α

Or, find the sum or difference of and the expression

above used, or any multiple of it that comes near

result, in either of these cases, will still be = number.

ay

a

[ocr errors]

and the

wh, a whole

4. Proceed in the same manner with this last result; and so on, till the coefficient of y becomes 1, and the remainder

= some number r; then

y ± r

a

wh, =p, and y = ap = r.

Where p may be 0, or any integral number whatever that makes y positive; and, as the value of y is now known, that of x may be found from the given equation, when the equation is possible.*

NOTE. Any indeterminate equation of the form

ax

by ±c,

in which a and b are prime to each other, is always possible, and will admit of an infinite number of answers in whole numbers.

But if the proposed equation be of the form

ax + by = c,

the number of answers will always be limited; and, in some cases, the question is impossible; both of which circum

* This rule is founded on the obvious principle, that the sum, difference, or product of any two whole numbers, is a whole number; and that if a number divides the whole of any other number and a part of it, it will also divide the remaining part.

stances may be readily discovered from the mode of solution

above given.*

EXAMPLES.

[merged small][ocr errors]

14y = 11, to find x and y in whole numbers.

[blocks in formation]

And, by rejecting y — 2, which is a whole number,

y - 6

19

wh. p.

[blocks in formation]

2. Given 2x+3y=25, to determine x and y in whole positive numbers.

[blocks in formation]

Hence, since x must be a whole number, it follows that

[blocks in formation]

a

* That the coefficients a and b, when these two formulæ are possible, should have no common divisor, which is not at the same time à divisor of c, is evident; for if a = md, and b = me, we shall have ax 士

[ocr errors]

mdx± mey = c; and consequently, dx+ey =

C

[ocr errors]

m

by =

But d, e, x, y, being

supposed to be whole numbers, must also be a whole number, which

m

it cannot be except when m is a divisor of c.

Hence, if it were required to pay 100%. in guineas and moidores only, the question would be impossible; since, in the equation 21x+27y 2000, which represents the conditions of the problem, the coefficients, 21 and 27, are each divisible by 3, whilst the absolute term 2000 is not divisible by it. See my Treatise on Atgebra, for the method of resolving questions of this kind by means of Continued Fractions.

[blocks in formation]

∞ = 12 − y + 1 — " = 12 − (1 − 2p) + p = 12 + 3p −1,

x

1-y
2

[ocr errors]

We shall have x = 11 + 3p, and y = 1 1 - 2p;

Where p may be any whole number whatever, that will render the values of x and y in these two equations positive.

[ocr errors]

But it is evident, from the value of y, that p must be either O or negative; and consequently, from that of x, that it must be 0, — 1, 2, or

3.

[blocks in formation]

૨ જી

y =

[ocr errors]

3, y

5, y = 7.

Which are all the answers in whole positive numbers that the question admits of.

3. Given 3x

whole numbers.

8y 16, to find the values of x and y in

[blocks in formation]

Or, by rejecting y, which is a whole number, there will

[blocks in formation]

Where, if p be put

3

3

8p.

3

1, we shall have x 8 and y 5 for their least values; the number of answers being, as in the first question, indefinite.

4. Given 21x + 17y = 2000, to find all the possible values of x and y in whole numbers.

[blocks in formation]
[blocks in formation]

Where, if p be put

21

0, we shall have the least value of y= 4, and the corresponding or greatest value of x = 92. And the rest of the answers will be found by adding 21 continually to the least value of y, and subtracting 17 from the greatest value of x; which being done, we shall obtain the six following results :

x = 92 75 58 41 24

7

y 4 25 46 67 88 109

These being all the solutions, in whole numbers, that the question admits of.

Note 1.-When there are three or more unknown quantities, and only one equation by which they can be determined, as ax + by + cz = d,

it will be proper first to find the limit of the quantity that has the greatest coefficient, and then to ascertain the different values of the former, from 1 up to that extent, as in the following question :

5. Given 3x+5y + 7z = 100, to find all the different values of x, y, and z in whole numbers.*

Here each of the least integer values of x and y are 1, by the question; whence it follows, that

100—5—3 100-8

[ocr errors][merged small]
[merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small]

Consequently, z cannot be greater than 13, which is also the limit of the number of answers; though they may be considerably less.

* If any indeterminate equation, of the kind above given, has one or more of its coefficients, as c, negative, the equation may be put under the form

ax + by=d+cz,

in which case it is evident that an indefinite number of values may be given to the second side of the equation by means of the indefinite quantity z; and consequently, also, to x and y in the first. And if the coefficients a, b, c, in any such equation, have a common divisor, while d has not, the question, as in the first case, becomes impossible.

« PreviousContinue »