( 807 ) LIST OF CASES DISTINGUISHED, COMMENTED ON, FOLLOWED, OR OVERRULED, ETC. Frog's Crs. v. His Children, 1735, M. 4262; followed in Mearns v. Charles and O g., 1926, S.L.T. 118. Horn v. North British Railway Co., 5 R. 1055; disapproved as to opinion of Lord Gifford in Quin v. Greenock, etc., Tramways Co., 1926, S.L.T. 313. Inland Revenue v. South Behar Railway Co., [1925] A. C. 476; followed in Inland Revenue v. Edinburgh and Bathgate Railway Co., 1926, S.L.T. 544. King v. Kenny, 4 Adam 275; followed in Bunton v. Miller, 1926, S.L.T. 683. Leslie's Judicial Factor, 1925 S. C. 464; applied in Woodard's Judicial Factor v. Woodard, 1926, S.L.T. 429. Lewis v. Anstruther, 1852, 14 D. 857, 15 D. 260; commented on in Forbes' Trs. v. Forbes, 1926, S.L.T. 135. 770. Macadam v. Findlay, 1911 S. C. 1366; commented on in Craig v. Monteith's Exrx., 1926, S.L.T. 427. Robertson v. Rutherford, 1841, 4 D. 121; commented on and explained in Crofts v. Stewart's Trs., 1926, S.L.T. 577. Suzor v. M'Lachlan, 1914 S. C. 306; distinguished in Dunnet v. Nelson, 1926, S.L.T. 493. Thomson v. Ure, 1925, S.L.T. (Sh. Ct.) 122; approved in M'Kellar v. M'Master, 1926, S.L.T. 50%. Watt v. Glasgow Corporation, 1919 S. C. 300; explained in Gray v. Glasgow Corporation, 1926, S.L.T. 607. Young v. Young, 1903, 5 F. 330; distinguished in Bruce v. Murray, 1926, S.L.T. 236. Young v. Young, 10 R. 184; distinguished in Parker v. Parker, 1926, S.L.T. 355. PRINTED IN GREAT BRITAIN BY NEILL AND CO., LTD., EDINBURGH. |