Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney, 1985 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 76
Page 66
... offenses that are supported by the evidence , and it would be unfair to require that the pros- ecution guess which offense the jury will decide has been committed . Another proposed solution is that in situations where the murder may ...
... offenses that are supported by the evidence , and it would be unfair to require that the pros- ecution guess which offense the jury will decide has been committed . Another proposed solution is that in situations where the murder may ...
Page 97
... offenses was thus admissible to establish defend- ant's intent in the present offense by corroborating the victim's testimony that she had not consented to the sex acts , so long as those prior offenses were not too remote and were ...
... offenses was thus admissible to establish defend- ant's intent in the present offense by corroborating the victim's testimony that she had not consented to the sex acts , so long as those prior offenses were not too remote and were ...
Page 447
... offenses connected together in their com- mission , or different statements of the same offense or two or more different offenses of the same class of crimes or offenses , under separate counts . . . [ P ] rovided , that the court in ...
... offenses connected together in their com- mission , or different statements of the same offense or two or more different offenses of the same class of crimes or offenses , under separate counts . . . [ P ] rovided , that the court in ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action admissible alleged amendment apply attorney Attorneys at Law Broussard Cal.Rptr California California Constitution cause charged City claim Code section committed compensation conclude concurring conduct conservatee constitutional contract conviction counsel County court held Court of Appeal crime custody death death penalty decision defendant defendant's denied determine duty employee evidence fact federal filed habeas corpus hearing hospital initiative injury intent issue Italics added joinder judgment July jurisdiction jurors jury Justice Kaus legislative Legislature liability malpractice medical malpractice ment MMBA Mosk motion murder negligence offenses opinion payment penalty person petition petitioner plaintiff prior prosecution protection provides pursuant rape rape trauma syndrome reasonable regulations Respondent Reynoso rule S.Ct Seaman's sentence special circumstance spousal support statute statutory subd subdivision Superior Court supra Supreme Court testified testimony third party tion tort trial court verdict victim violation WCAB Whitt writ of mandate