Federal Supplement: Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations, Volume 218West Publishing Company - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 70
Page 24
... prior art . If in fact they , or any one of them , is within the prior art , and they are equivalents , there is no in- vention in the substitution of one for any other , Since so much emphasis is now placed by plaintiffs upon the ...
... prior art . If in fact they , or any one of them , is within the prior art , and they are equivalents , there is no in- vention in the substitution of one for any other , Since so much emphasis is now placed by plaintiffs upon the ...
Page 328
... prior art artificial foliage structures introduced into evidence by plaintiff and defendants and as well , the teachings thereof in combination with the prior art patents and publications relied upon by defend- ants . The Court finds ...
... prior art artificial foliage structures introduced into evidence by plaintiff and defendants and as well , the teachings thereof in combination with the prior art patents and publications relied upon by defend- ants . The Court finds ...
Page 330
... prior art foreign patents are strictly construed and are restricted to what is clearly and defi- nitely disclosed therein . Nordberg Mfg . Co. v . Woolerly Machine Co. , ( CCA 7 ) , 79 F.2d 685 , 687 . 12. It is reasonable to conclude ...
... prior art foreign patents are strictly construed and are restricted to what is clearly and defi- nitely disclosed therein . Nordberg Mfg . Co. v . Woolerly Machine Co. , ( CCA 7 ) , 79 F.2d 685 , 687 . 12. It is reasonable to conclude ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
action agreement alleged Alleghany Alleghany Corporation amended application arbitration Board CHIEF JUDGE circuit Cite as 218 claim clause Clayton Act collective bargaining Commission Company complaint Congress constitute contract Corp corporation counsel damages decision defendant defendant's denied dismiss dispute District Court District Judge Eisler electric employees etching evidence extrinsic fraud F.Supp fact federal fendant filed finding foil Fort Worth Government granted held income injury Internal Revenue Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Act Interstate Commerce Commission involved issue judgment jurisdiction KEY NUMBER SYSTEM Kirby L.Ed liability libel ment metal motion National operation parties patent Pennsylvania petition petitioner plaintiff printing prior prior art proceeding question Railroad Railway Labor Act reason rule S.Ct Section sion statute suit summary judgment supra Supreme Court tiff tion trial U. S. Atty Union United States District violation Worth Club York York City Zenn