Federal Supplement: Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations, Volume 221West Publishing Company - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 77
Page 97
... ment Board did not consider the applica- tions upon their merits , but routinely approved the School Board's recommen- dation on the ground that each of the requests for placement had been filed after May 31 , 1962. In its letter ad ...
... ment Board did not consider the applica- tions upon their merits , but routinely approved the School Board's recommen- dation on the ground that each of the requests for placement had been filed after May 31 , 1962. In its letter ad ...
Page 304
... ment " . The " Flight Engineers Agree- ment " , from its definition and other- wise , seems clearly to be the basic agree- ment ; the dues check - off agreement is not included nor even referred to . In any event , neither " grievances ...
... ment " . The " Flight Engineers Agree- ment " , from its definition and other- wise , seems clearly to be the basic agree- ment ; the dues check - off agreement is not included nor even referred to . In any event , neither " grievances ...
Page 307
... ment results , defendant will then be free to stop the check - off - but not before . [ 8 ] The Company argues that by limiting the check - off of dues to a fixed period expiring April 30 , 1963 , the par- ties agreed that no notices ...
... ment results , defendant will then be free to stop the check - off - but not before . [ 8 ] The Company argues that by limiting the check - off of dues to a fixed period expiring April 30 , 1963 , the par- ties agreed that no notices ...
Contents
Judges VII | |
Tables of Cases Reported XIX | |
Supreme Court Rules XLIII | 5 |
1 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreement alleged amended antitrust appears application arbitration arrest Attorney authority Bank Bankruptcy carrier cause of action CHIEF JUDGE Circuit Cite as 221 City claim Clayton Act Commerce Commission Company complaint constitute contract Corp corporation counsel County decedent decision defendant defendant's denied determination dismiss District Court District Judge employees entitled evidence F.Supp fact Federal fendant filed granted hearing held injury interest Internal Interstate Commerce Interstate Commerce Act Interstate Commerce Commission Intourist issue judgment judicial jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Land O'Lakes Macon County ment motion motor Ohio operation Parcel parties patent payment person petition petitioner plaintiff prior prior art proceeding pursuant question railroad Railway Labor Act reasonable rule S.Ct Section sion statute suit summary judgment supra Supreme Court tiff tion trial trustees union United States District violation York