Federal Supplement: Cases Argued and Determined in the District Courts of the United States and the Court of Claims, with Key Number Annotations, Volume 175West Publishing Company, 1959 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 77
Page 273
... reason of construction of Will by Appel- late Court- $ 14,504.80 . Total $ 18,283.06 . The Director allowed $ 1,107.35 , the tax attributable to ( 1 ) but disallowed the balance of $ 4,763.83 applicable to ( 2 ) . The reason given by ...
... reason of construction of Will by Appel- late Court- $ 14,504.80 . Total $ 18,283.06 . The Director allowed $ 1,107.35 , the tax attributable to ( 1 ) but disallowed the balance of $ 4,763.83 applicable to ( 2 ) . The reason given by ...
Page 311
... reason . Again the bankruptcy did not supersede the chattel mortgage foreclosure either in time or in law . The chattel mortgage was a lien long pre- existing the bankruptcy . Its validity is admitted . The foreclosure of this ad ...
... reason . Again the bankruptcy did not supersede the chattel mortgage foreclosure either in time or in law . The chattel mortgage was a lien long pre- existing the bankruptcy . Its validity is admitted . The foreclosure of this ad ...
Page 401
... reason why Judge Graven did not repeat 175 F.Supp . - 26 this finding or make any finding at all upon the subject was as a consequence of statements made by Mr. Raisch at the time of arguing the motion for new trial , exonerating Briggs ...
... reason why Judge Graven did not repeat 175 F.Supp . - 26 this finding or make any finding at all upon the subject was as a consequence of statements made by Mr. Raisch at the time of arguing the motion for new trial , exonerating Briggs ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreed agreement alleged amended amount application April Asheim attorney Bank Boston Briggs & Stratton Budget Bureau charge Chief Judge Cite as 175 claim Company complaint construction corporation cost counsel damages defendant defendant's District Court District Judge Dixon employees entitled evidence excess profits tax F.Supp fact February 25 Federal fendant filed Government held Hughes income infringement interest Internal Revenue Internal Revenue Code issue Jones Act judgment jurisdiction jury KEY NUMBER SYSTEM L.Ed Labor Lehman Brothers libel Memphis ment Middle South motion Office opinion paid parties patent payment Pigeon Hole Parking plaintiff Power Contract prior prior art proposal question refund rule S.Ct Section sponsors Stat statute suit summary judgment supra taxpayer Ted Price termination tiff tion trial trust U. S. Atty United States District valve Washington Wenzell Wenzell's York City