Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal Reasoning
Anglo-American private law (the law governing mutual rights and obligations of individuals) has been a far more complex phenomenon than is usually recognized. Attempts to reduce it to a single explanatory principle, or to a precisely classified or categorized map, scheme, or diagram, are likely to distort the past by omitting or marginalizing material inconsistent with proposed principles or schemes. Many legal issues cannot be allocated exclusively to one category. Often several concepts have worked concurrently and cumulatively, so that competing explanations and categories are not so much alternatives, of which only one can be correct, as different dimensions of a complex phenomenon, of which several may be simultaneously valid and necessary. This 2003 study will be of importance to those interested in property, tort, contract, unjust enrichment, legal reasoning, legal method, the history of the common law, and the relation between legal theory and legal history.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Introduction the mapping of legal concepts
Johanna Wagner and the rival opera houses
Liability for economic harms
Liability for physical harms
Profits derived from wrongs
Other editions - View all
Dimensions of Private Law: Categories and Concepts in Anglo-American Legal ...
S. M. Waddams
No preview available - 2003
action appeared argument benefit Birks breach of contract called Canada caused chapter claim common law compensation concepts conclusion conduct considerations considered constructive contract law cost court damages decision defendant defendant's derived discussed distinction DLR 4th economic effect employee enforceable English equity evidence example exclusively expectation facts give ground Harvard Law Review held historical House idea important imposed injunction injury interest issue Journal judges judicial jurisdictions justice kind land Law of Restitution Law Review liability London Lord loss Lumley means negligence obligation Oxford party performance person plaintiff practice present principle private law profits promise proprietary protection public policy question reason relation reliance remedy result rule sense specific strict Studies suggested tort trust unjust enrichment Wagner wrong wrongdoing