What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
advance agree agreement amount arrangement association average bagging benefit better bill boat Buffalo bushel called canal capital carry cents certificates CHAIRMAN charge combination commission committee Company competition consumer contract copper corporations cost creamery deal dealers delivered demand difference dollars effect elevator engaged entirely fact farmer five fixed follows forty four freight give grain grocers half hands increased interest less Limited manufacture mean meet Milk Exchange mills mines months never one-fourth one-half cent operation organization paid party persons pound present producer profit purchase question railroad raw sugar reason receive reference refined refineries represent require result running sell Senate shipped sold stopped storage sugar supply syndicate thing trade trust wholesale York
Page 8 - It must not be forgotten that you are not to extend arbitrarily those rules which say that a given contract is void as being against public policy, because if there is one thing which more than another public policy requires it is that men of full age and competent understanding shall have the utmost liberty of contracting, and that their contracts, when entered into freely and voluntarily, shall be held sacred, and shall be enforced by courts of justice.
Page 302 - The clear tendency of such an agreement is to establish a monopoly, and to destroy competition in trade, and for that reason on grounds of public policy, courts will not aid in its enforcement. It is no answer to say that competition in the salt trade was not in fact destroyed, or that the price of the commodity was not unreasonably advanced. Courts will not stop to inquire as to the degree of injury inflicted upon the public ; it is enough to know that the inevitable tendency of such contracts is...
Page 306 - Any combination, the tendency of which is to prevent competition in its broad and general sense and to control, and thus at will enhance prices to the detriment of the public, is a legal monopoly.
Page 233 - WITNESSETH that the said party, of the first part, for and in consideration of the sum of One Thousand two hundred dollars, lawful money of the United States of America to them in hand paid by the party of the second part, at or before the ensealing and delivery of these presents, the receipt whereof is hereby acknowledged...
Page 7 - VI. c.14. to be the buying or contracting for any merchandise or victual coming in the way to market; or dissuading persons from bringing their goods or provisions there: or persuading them to enhance the price, when there: any of which practices make the market dearer to the fair trader.
Page 250 - And it is further agreed that if any rent shall be due and unpaid, or if default be made in any of the covenants herein contained, it shall then be lawful for the said party of the first part...
Page 7 - Regrating was described by the same statute to be the buying of corn, or other dead victual, in any market, and selling it again in the same market, or within four miles of the place.
Page 296 - When the certificate shall have been filed as aforesaid, the persons who shall have signed and acknowledged the same, and their successors, shall be a body politic and corporate, in fact and in name, by the name stated in such certificate, and by that name...
Page 300 - We are not aware of any rule of law which makes the motive of the covenantee the test of the validity of such a contract. On the contrary we suppose a party may legally purchase the trade and business of another for the very purpose of preventing competition, and the validity of the contract, if supported by a consideration, will depend upon its reasonableness as between the parties.
Page 304 - One word in passing only on the contention that this combination of the defendants was unlawful because it was in restraint of trade. It seems to me it was no more in restraint of trade, as that phrase is used for the purpose of avoiding contracts, than if two tailors in a village agreed to give their customers five per cent, off their bills at Christmas on condition of their customers dealing with them and with them only.