Page images
PDF
EPUB

judge. He was born in the parish of Wear Gifford, in Devonshire, and educated at Oxford, from whence he removed to Lincoln's-inn. In 1430 he was made a sergeant at law, and in 1441 chief justice of the court of King's-bench. He served Henry VI. with such fidelity, that in the first parliament of Edward IV. he was attainted of high treason with other adherents of that unfortunate prince, whom he followed into Scotland, where Henry made him chancellor of England. In 1463 he went abroad, and settled in Lorrain. While in exile, he wrote his famous book, entitled, De Laudibus Legum Angliæ, which however was not published till the reign of Henry VIII.; since which it has been frequently printed. When the affairs of the house of Lancaster turned, Fortescue came back to England, and though his party did not succeed, yet he remained unmolested. He lived to the age of 90, and was buried in the church of Elberton in Gloucestershire, where he had bought an estate. The best edition of his book is that of 1741.

FORTEVENTURA, one of the Canary Islands, 65 miles in length, and of a very irregular breadth. It produces plenty of wheat, barley, beeves, and goats. Lat. 28. 4 N. Lon. 14. 26 W.

FORTH. ad. (rond, Saxon; whence further, furthest, corrupted from forther, for thest.) 1. Forward; onward in time (Spenser). 2. Forward in place or order (Whitgift). 3. Abroad; out of doors (Shakspeare). 4. Out away; beyond the boundary of any place (Spenser). 5. Out into public view (Waller). 6. Thoroughly; from beginning to end (Shakspeare). 7. To a certain degree (Hammond). 8. On to the end (Memoir in Strype).

FORTH. prep. Out of (Donne).

FORTH, a fine river of Scotland, which rises in Perthshire. After a course of nearly

40 miles it meets the German ocean a little below Alloa, where it forms a noble æstuary, I called the Frith of Forth.

FORTHCOMING. a. (forth and coming) Ready to appear; not absconding (Shakspeare). FORTHI'SSUING. a. Coming out; coming forward from a covert (Pope).

FORTHRIGHT. ad. Straight forward; without flexions (Dryden).

FORTHRIGHT. s. A straight path (Shak

speare).

FORTHWITH. ad. Immediately; without delay; at once; straight (Davies). FORTIETH. a. (from forty.) The fourth

tenth.

FORTIFIABLE. a. (from fortify.) What may be fortified.

FORTIFICATION. s. (fortification, Fr.) 1. The science of military architecture. 2. A place built for strength (Sidney). 3. Addition of strength (Gov. of Tongue).

FORTIFICATION, called also Military Architecture, is the art of strengthening a place by erecting batteries, walls, and other works, around the same, to render it capable of being defended by a small force against the attack of a more numerous enemy.

At a time when the great simplicity of manners gave a limit to the ambition even of the most aspiring, and when science was yet in the womb of time, we may reasonably conclude, that the means of control and of resistance, then in use, were neither costly, laborious, nor very effectual. The details furnished in scripture prove incontestibly, that even the circumvallations used at their date were inadequate to the purposes of security and duration. In fact, the events that shone conspicuous in those times were, with very few exceptions, pitched battles in the open plain, ambuscades, and treasonable conspiracies!

Nor do we find in the more recent histories of

Rome, of Greece, of Asia, or of other parts then holding any rank in the military world, much to support the opinion of the ancients having knowledge of fortification. The few places that made any resistance appear to have been principally maintained by the personal prowess of their de fenders. Their walls were, indeed, sometimes of great moment, as we see in the instance of Troy; which, if existing in the eighteenth century, would probably capitulate at the first summons.

It was not to be expected that where the powers of demolition were insignificant, the means of resistance would be extended beyond the quantum absolutely necessary. The catapulta, the battering ram, the tower, and such devices, were opposed by heavy masses of stone, or of other adequate

materials, on which the besieged mounted to repel the assault. The various contrivances whereby those machines received additional vigour, and the necessity that arose for opposing to their progress

more resistance than could be accumulated im

mediately in their front, (of the tower in particular) first gave rise to the introduction of projections from the even line of the wall, whereby the besiegers could be annoyed laterally, as well as immediately front to front.

Still the engineer confined himself to small projections, generally semicircular, which, for the most part, appear to have been added to the old In the sequel, these towers were built the same as walls, impending like our modern balcony windows.

modern bastion, rested on the terra firma. It the other parts of circumvallation, and, like the

however seems doubtful, whether the former mode was not the best, considering every circumstance attendant upon the ancient mode of assault, and the nature of their weapons.

The invention of gunpowder does not appear to have made any important change for several years, nor indeed until heavy artillery formed a part of the assailants' means, as may be proved by an examination of the remaining castles, towers, keeps, &c. the dates may be traced beyond the middle of the fourteenth century. Such were the solidity the stone shots, originally used, produced a very and the hardness of many ancient buildings, that slight effect; nor was it until iron balls werebrought into use that the powers of cannon were, in any

measure, ascertained.

That point being gained, the whole system of defence was necessarily made to conform to the destructive engines which now were added to the common practices of assault. The sword, buckler, their wonted estimation, and, dwindling into insiglance, dart, javelin, sling, bow and arrow, lost nificance on the great scale, were reserved for individual contest, or for the lesser purposes of desultory warfare. The great object was to construct such stupendous bulwarks as might not only oppose the newly devised missiles, but, at the

same time, support similar means of destroying dell's Fortification: and Lochee's Field Fortifithe invading army. cation.

Hence arose the formation of ramparts, and, gradually, the necessity for deep ditches, and various outworks; whereby considerable delay and difficulty might be created.

The fortifications of the fifteenth century, although to a certain extent new modelled, and made conformable to the necessity imposed by the invention and use of cannon, nevertheless did not display any ingenuity in regard to mutual defence. That great principle was little understood, and the minutiæ of the science remained, for a long time, miserably defective. Men of genius, at length, in part remedied the errors of the old school, and opened the way for that exactness of proportion, and for that systematic arrangement, which characterize the works of modern times. The impregnable fortresses to be seen in various parts of Europe, cannot fail to transmit the names of their several engineers to posterity; unhappily, not unaccompanied by those of the traitors who, even since the commencement of the present century, have shamefully abandoned the posts of honour, and yielded to inferior powers.

The immense armies now constantly brought into the field, and the heavy trains of artillery by which they are, in almost all cases, attended, occasion not only an adequate preparation for resistance, but the necessity for establishing lines of communication, of depots, &c. all of which must be on the best construction for defence, containing safe lodgment for a sufficient garrison, together with ample and secure magazines for provisions and for stores. Hence the province of the engineer becomes peculiarly important; it comprises various branches of information, and requires that readiness of computation, of discernment, and of appropriate resource, which rarely combine in the same individual. The merely planning in the closet, and the laying down on the soil such defences as may perhaps be void of fault, so far as relates to mutual support, and to the great work of procrastination, will avail nothing, if the other essentials are neglected; and even when they are not, the whole may be rendered abortive, and become contemptible, merely from a want of judgment in point of locality.

Those whose turn of mind, or whose professional pursuits, lead them to trace the gradual progress of fortification minutely from its rude origin to its present state, will read with pleasure the history given by Mr. Robins in the preface to his Gunnery. The principal treatises on fortification are Melder's Praxis Fortificatoria: Les Fortifications du Comte de Pagan: L'Ingénieur Parfait du Sieur de Ville: Sturmy's Architectura Militaris Hypothetical.: Blondel's Nouvelle Maniere de Fortifier les Places: the Abbé de Fay's Veritable Maniere de Bien Fortifier: Vauban's Ingénieur François: Coehorn's Nouvelle Fortification tant pour un Terrain bas et humide, que sec et elevé: Alexander de Grotte's Fortification: Donatus Roselli's Fortification: Medrano's Ingénieur François: the chevalier de St. Julien's Architecture Militaire: Lansberg's Nouvelle Maniere de Fortifier les Places: an anonymous treatise in French, called Nouvelle Maniere de Fortifier les Places, tirée des Methodes du chevalier de Ville, &c.: Ozanam's Traité de Fortification: Memoires de PArtillerie de Surirey de St. Remy: Muller's treatises of Elementary and Practical Fortification: Montalambert's Fortification Perpendiculaire: Landmann's works on Fortification: Pley

From the general idea and office of fortification some useful fundamental rules or maxims may be drawn: as,

1. That the manner of fortifying should be accommodated to that of attacking; so that no one manner can be assured always to hold, unless it be assured the manner of besieging be incapable of being altered; and that to judge of the perfection of a fortification, the method of besieging at the time when it was built must be considered.

2. All the parts of a fortification should be able to resist the most forcible machines used in be sieging, and they should be equally strong on all sides.

3. A fortification should be so contrived, as that it may be defended with as few men as possible; which consideration, when well attended to, saves a vast deal of expence.

4. That the defendants may be in the better condition, they must not be exposed to the enemy's guns and mortars; but the aggressors must be exposed to theirs.

Hence, 5. All the parts of a fortification should be so disposed, as that they may defend each other: in order to this, every part there is to be flanked, i. e. capable of being seen and defended from some other; so that there be no place where an enemy can lodge himself, either unseen, or under shelter.

6. All the campaign around must lie open to the defendants; so that no hills or eminence must be allowed, behind which the enemy might shelter himself from the guns of the fortification; or from which he might annoy them with his own.

The fortress, then, is to command all the place round about; consequently the out-works must all be lower than the body of the place.

7. No line of defence is to be above point-blank musquet-shot, which is from one hundred and twenty to one hundred and fifty fathom.

8. The acuter the angle at the center, the stronger is the place; as consisting of the more sides, and consequently more defensible.

9. All the defences should be as nearly direct as possible. Such are the general laws and views of fortification: the particular ones, respecting each several work or member thereof, will be delivered under their proper articles. See BASTION.

The art of Fortification may be distinguished into two parts, viz. the elementary or theoretical, and practical.

Elementary or theoretical Fortification, consists in tracing the plans and profiles of a fortification on paper, with scales and compasses; and in examining the systems proposed by different authors, in order to discover their advantages and disadvantages.

Practical Fortification, consists in forming a pro ject of a fortification according to the nature of the ground, and other necessary circumstances, tracing it on the ground, and executing the project, together with all the military buildings, such as magazines, store-houses, bridges, &c.

Fortification again is either offensive or defensive. Offensive fortification is the same with the attack of a place, and is the art of making and conducting all the different works in a siege, in order to gain possession of the place.

Defensive, or defence Fortification, is the art of defending a town that is besieged, with all the advantages which the fortification of it will admit.

Fortification is also used for the place fortified;

or the several works raised to defend and flank it, siegers approaches in proportion; and, therefore, and keep off the enemy.

All fortifications consist of lines and angles, which have various names, according to their various offices.

The principal angles are those of the center, the flanking angle, flanked angle, angle of the epaule, &c.

The principal lines are those of circumvallation, of contravallation, of the capital, &c. See each in its place.

Fortifications are divided into regular, and irregular, and again into durable and temporary.

Regular Fortification is that wherein the bastions are all equal; or that which is built in a regular polygon, the sides and angles whereof are generally about a musquet shot from each other.

the strength of a fortification increases in proportion to the number and length of its sides; so that a dodecagon is stronger than an octagon, when the length of their sides is the same. However, as it is found difficult to inscribe a polygon in an ellipse or oval, the following more easy method will answer the purpose. Reduce the spot of ground to be fortified to the figure ACEG fig. 3. and draw BE, AF, parallel to each other; draw CH, DG, perpendicular to these lines, and at equal distance from the points B and E, and let their interval be equal to that of the lines BE and AF; then, draw DC, GH, parallel to AF and BE, and equally distant from them; and from their intersections C, D, G, H, with DG, CH, as centers, describe arcs, with a radius equal to CD or GH, In a regular fortification, the parts being all so as to intersect the lines AF, BE, in A, B, E, F ; qual, have the advantage of being equally de- join the points A, B, E, F, and ABCDEFGH, will fensible; so that there are no weak places. See be an oblong octagon, having one half similar and Pl. 72. fig. 2. equal to the other half. If a hexagon be to be described, instead of drawing the two lines CH, DG, one will be sufficient; in a decagon there must be three, and four in a dodecagon. If the sides cannot easily be made equal, then the sides AB, EF, on the narrowest part of the polygon, should be the longest, because it is the weakest. But when the figure cannot in any respect be made regular, the strength of each side must be est mated according to the works a besieger is obliged to make in the attack, and according to the obstacles he meets with in his approaches.

Irregular Fortification, is that wherein the bastions are unequal, and unlike; or the sides and angles not all equal, and equidistant.

In an irregular fortification, the defence and strength being unequal, there is a necessity for reducing the irregular figure, as near as may be, to a regular one; i. e. instead of inscribing it in a circle, it should be inscribed in an oval, so that one half may be similar and equal to the other half.

And as the irregularity of a figure depends on the quantity of angles and sides; the irregularity of a fortification arises either from the angles being too small, or the sides being too long, or too short.

Consequently an irregular figure being proposed to be fortified; all the angles, with the quantity of the sides, must be found, to be able to judge how it is to be fortified. See Pl. 72. fig. 1. which represents a fortification inscribed in an oval.

In this case the sides CD, GH, on the flat parts, are stronger than the sides AB, EF, on the narrow parts, supposing all the exterior sides equal, and the place equally fortified. When the angles BCD, CDE of the polygon are very great, and the besieger comes within a small distance of the works, he cannot approach nearer, without being seen in front, except by a direct sap, with traverses; and as this way of approaching presents but a small front, the besieged, who have a much larger, may oppose with peculiar advantage: whereas, if the angles HAB, ABC of the polygon, are very small, the besiegers may carry their approaches to the counterscarp itself, and have always a larger front than the besieged; and, as the besiegers must extend their approaches to three fronts, whether they are small or large, the work of the approaches before the front BCDE will be to the work before the front HABC, as the line BE is to the line HC, nearly, i. e. as the greater axis of the oval is to the less; and therefore the front CD, on the flat side, is stronger than the front AB, on the narrow side; consequently, the longer CD is, so that the lines of defence are within the reach of musket-shot, and the angles BCD, CDE, are the same, the stronger will the front be; since the works become more spacious, hold more troops to defend them, and the besiegers are obliged to extend their trenches farther. More over, the greater the angles of the polygon BCD, CDE are, the exterior sides being the same, the stronger will be the front CD; because the length of the line BE increases, and the extent of the be

Marine Fortification, is sometimes used by way of distinction from land fortification, and denotes the art of raising works fit for the defence of a harbour against the attacks of any kind of shipping; but the works proper for this purpose depend in a great measure on the principles employed in the fortification of towns. However, attention should be given to the situation of roads or harbours in contriving works for their defence: e. gr. when a town lies open to the sea, on a curved, or straight bold shore, and has before it a sufficient depth of water and good anchorage, the ships, in this situation, may be well defended by forts built near the water's edge on each side of the anchoring place, so contrived as to have two or three batteries, one higher than the other, and furnished with a sufficient number of cannon, carrying shot from twenty-four to forty-eight pounds. A town, in this situation, may be defended by a rampart, or wall, well flanked, built along the shore, beside the fortifications on the land side. The works along the shore should be carried so near to the water's edge, that troops, attempting to land under the cannon of a fleet, might not find ground on which to intrench themselves. Farther, when a harbour, being a bay, has a shoal or small island lying before its entrance, a strong fort should be built upon the island, in a place where it can command the entrance on both sides, if the island be not too large; otherwise two or more forts should be erected in such places as may command the avenues to the bay; other forts should also be raised on the most convenient points of land, forming the mouth of the bay. Again, when the harbour is in a bay, whose points, forming the entrance, stretch into the sea, and approach one another within cannon shot; such a harbour may be fortified by building on both sides of its entrance one or more forts; and, if possible, a fort should also be built within the harbour's mouth in such a manner, that its cannon can rake the shipping fore and aft as they come in.

[subsumed][merged small][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][graphic][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][subsumed][ocr errors][subsumed][subsumed][merged small][ocr errors]
« PreviousContinue »