Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

and the Remainder

f

8

Term of the Quotient a Sub-Multiple of the first Term of

a 우: : then suppose is to be Divided by

,& =s. Again, lupposé s to be Divided by a Sub-Multiple thereof =b Prime come and giving the firt Term of the Quotient ja Sub-Multiple of the firt Term of , and then being Divided by ñ suppose the Remainder=o. I lay

is = the greateft common Divisor required.

to

2

.b

[ocr errors]

8

[ocr errors]

b

wi

[merged small][ocr errors]

and

* i.e. The value of his

g

g

b

2

[ocr errors][merged small][ocr errors][merged small][merged small][merged small]

Measures.
Measures jsms; therefore suppofition.

{ }axiom{1}}}
6

;
1 /
Measures

Š
Measures s; therefore Measures
; c.

and consequently «. Again, i "Measures box therefore Measures b.—: But aa . Measures and consequentlyr; therefore : Measures b tr=b. Whence'is certain that is a common Measure to, or of b and c.

b Now in order to prove that it is the Greaceft, let w be the greatest common Measure of b and c. Then f being Prime sob, and w Measuring b; f will there

fore

[ocr errors]

с

[ocr errors]

fore be * Prime to w; and fand d, 25. 7. Eucl, El.

• Measuring c;

wf will e, a consequence from the Measurec, os w will Measure a

: 36 and 37. 7 Eucl. El.

Bac Measures bor; there

f fore we will Measuré bar, and consequently b -

br=r. Again,g being ‘Prime to

to and w Meafuring Fi

-; g will therefore be «Prime' to w, and 'g and to Measuring ; gw wille Measure r, or 'w will Measure : But -: But Measures jas;

-s; therefore w will Mea8 fure - - - ; and “confequentlyg - Again, 6 being 'Prime to, and w Measuring

8

8 b will therefore te “Prime tow; and hand w Measuring s;b w will 'Measures; viz. w will Measure bw ; w ; ; confe

į quently w cannot exceed ; therefore they are equal.

Finally, it is evident, that the like Demonstration with this may be applied to any other Number of Quantities. 2. E. D.

Q.

8

;

[ocr errors]

Se&. 3. To abbreviate or bring a Frational Quan

tity into its lowest Denomination.

1

Hule. Divide the Numerator and Denominator severally by their greatest common Divisor, and the respective Quotients plac'd Fraction-wise, is the Fraction required.

Examples

44с

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Examples. 1. Let it be required to reduce to its leart Terms.

od aac being Divided by c (which c is the greatest common Divi: for of aac and de), gives aa for a new Numerator; and dc being Divided by c, gives d for a new Denominator : consequently, na is the Fraction required. d

bdc 2. In like manner at

is found to be =*

bc 4+d.

In such fingle Fra&tions as ibee, the common Divisors (if there be any) are easily discover'd by inspection only: But in compound Fras dions it muft (for the most Pari) be found by our Lemma thus, 3. Let it be required to reduce

aa + 2bat bb

to its lowest

bba Terms.

First I Divide the greater of the two given Quantities, vix That which has the Greatest power of a in', (in respect of which Letter the Terms were plac'd) by the Less thus, nat aba + bb) a} - bba' (a - 26

a3 + abaat bba

2baa 2bbs - 2baa 4bba

+2bba +267 Now since the firft Term of the Divisor has a greater Power of a in it than the first Term of 2bba + 263; this therefore is a Remainder: But the first Term thereof, viz. 2bba is not a SubMultiple of aa, the first Term of the said Divisor; wherefore I Divide the said Remainder by 2bb a Sub-Multiple thereof, Prime to the said Divisor, and giving the first Term of the Quotient a Sub-Multiple of the first Term of the aforesaid Divisor; thus 2bb) abba + 163 (a + b

2bba
o + 262

263

2 263

o

E

And

And the Quotient is a +b; by which I Divide the said Divisor ; thus

atb) ant abat bb la tb

[ocr errors]
[merged small][ocr errors]

Whence +b is the greatest common Measure required, by which the given Fraction will be reduc'd to its lowest Terms; chas

+b) aa + 2ba + bb (a + b the new Numerator.

aat ba

bat bb bat bb

stb) 03 - bba (as - be the new Denominator,

a3 + ban

baa
baa

bla

bba

[ocr errors]

ba

A4

Consequently

is the Fraction required.

x4 4. In like manner

will be reduc'd to its lower Terms thus, ** - 64) * _ j bb fx

- for

[ocr errors]

x64

- bb)

-*} b6+ *b+ Remainder.
*} bb + xb+ (x! — xbb) x4 -- be (x
xbb

** -xxbb
+ xxbb_bt Remainder,

Fxbe

[ocr errors]

bb) xxbb b* (** - bb) * -- xbb (x xxbb

xbb

Remainder.

[ocr errors]

Hence xx - bb is the greatest common Divisor of x*

x4 be and xs - *b, by which

will be reduc'd to

xx+66 xs by this Sc&t. s. Ler it be required to reduce

- ** + cx +-*-
+

to its

axti lowest Terms. First I Divide - **+tox-c by ** – 2x + 1, thus - +

+c XX – 2x + 1)

C (-! X--1 +1

*x + 2x – And the Remainder is

+

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

to

[ocr errors]

But the first Term of this Remainder ; viz. FX is not aSubMultiple of the first Term of the foregoing Divifor ; to wit of xx; wherefore I Divide the said Remainder by its Sub-Mulmultiple

+ which is Prime to the said Divisor, and will give the firft Term of the Quotient a Sub Multiple of the first Term of the said Divisor ; thus,

a

[ocr errors][ocr errors][ocr errors]
[blocks in formation]
« PreviousContinue »