Page images
PDF
EPUB

TYLER, RALPH W. Training administrative officers for democratic leadership. Proceedings of the Eighth annual conference for administrative officers of public and private schools, 1939. Chicago, Ill., University of Chicago Press, 1939. 214 p.

Watertown, Mass. Report of the survey of the schools of Watertown, Massachusetts. New York, N. Y. Teachers College, Columbia University, 1931. WEIGEL, H. F. Why superintendents lose their jobs. Master's thesis. Lincoln, Nebr., University of Nebraska, 1935. (Unpublished.)

WENGER, S. B. School administration as a profession. Master's thesis. Lincoln, Nebr., University of Nebraska, 1930. (Unpublished.)

WOODY, CLIFFORD. Graduate work in the teachers colleges of Michigan. Bulletin of the University of Michigan, School of Education, November 1939. p. 19-23.

Workshop on teacher education. A program for teacher education in Ohio, proposed by the Workshop on teacher education, which was sponsored by the colleges of education of Bowling Green State University, Kent State University, Miami University, Ohio University, and Ohio State University, in cooperation with the Commission on Teacher Education of the American Council on Education. Columbus, Ohio, Ohio State University Press, 1940.

38 p.

Miscellaneous Materials Sent by Institutions

(Forms, blanks, test units, organization charts, and other mimeographed and printed materials relating to the education of school administrators) COLORADO STATE COLLEGE OF EDUCATION: Policy statement of the Committee on the Doctorate. Objectives of Colorado State College of Education. UNIVERSITY OF IOWA: Memorandum: Graduate Work in the College of Education. HARVARD UNIVERSITY: Memorandum. By Alfred D. Simpson, John F. Sly; and Francis T. Spaulding. Research, service and instruction in educational administration. September 1940.

UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA: First Annual Report of the School of Education Personnel Committee. May 1940.

UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA: Training of superintendents in small school systems; significant elements to consider in professional training of superintendents of small schools; the small city superintendency as a professional career. UNIVERSITY OF BUFFALO: An analysis of the elements needed in the training of the secondary school principal.

COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY: Student rating forms.

UNIVERSITY OF PITTSBURGH: Graduate education in school administration.

FISK UNIVERSITY: Report on the Workshop Seminar Summer of 1940.
GEORGE PEABODY COLLEGE for TEACHERS: Outline of core courses.

UNIVERSITY OF WYOMING: Student personnel materials.

[blocks in formation]

Connecticut.
Do.

District of Columbia.

Florida.

Georgia.

Hawaii.

Idaho.

Illinois.

Indiana.

Do.

Do.

Iowa.

Kansas.

Do.

Do.

Kentucky.

Do.

Maine.

Maryland.

Massachusetts.

Do.

Do.

[blocks in formation]

Covering Letter

FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY,

U. S. OFFICE OF EDUCATION,
Washington, September 25, 1940.

MY DEAR SIR: It is the desire of the U. S. Office of Education to bring to the attention of graduate school faculties information concerning current practice and experimentation in the field of the education of school administrators, that is, of superintendents, principals, and supervisors. Your cooperation in filling out the attached schedule of information is therefore earnestly requested.

This is not to be a survey in the usual sense but rather an invitation to the institutions canvassed to share with other institutions their experiences which may serve as constructive leads and suggestions. The results of this canvass will be distributed in bulletin form to all those responding. In making use of the data collected in this inquiry no attempt will be made to evaluate practice as reported. For each institution responding there will be prepared an objective, positive statement of what is being attempted which may be of interest to others.

It is hoped that this inquiry may result in some interuniversity visitation and exchange of experience and ideas. As one dean of education put it recently, "I would go anywhere in the United States where there is an idea operating. I would want to study it and live with it." Another educator calls for a "new kind" of directory, high-spotting current, constructive practice in the field.

A franked envelope requiring no postage is enclosed for your reply together with a penalty label for mailing any pertinent publications.

Cordially yours,

Enclosures.

BESS GOODYKOONTZ,

Assistant U. S. Commissioner of Education.

Schedule of Information

FEDERAL SECURITY AGENCY,
U. S. OFFICE OF EDUCATION,
Washington, October 1, 1940.

CURRENT ACTIVITIES, PRACTICES AND THINKING IN THE EDUCATION OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATOrs (Superintendents, Principals, and General SuperviSORS)

GRADUATE SCHOOLS AND DEPARTMENTS OF EDUCATION

Schedule of Information

There are attached herewith a series of questions under five general headings. You are requested to respond to each of the questions as directed. Where the response is either "yes" or "no" we ask that you take the question quite literally and respond as objectively as possible. Qualifying statements may be made on a separate sheet with a number reference. Tabulation of returns on this type of question will not be set up by institutions but for the total group.

Responses to all other questions should be made on a separate sheet with a number reference as indicated for each question. Please attach these sheets to the original schedule form and return to the Office of Education by November 1, 1940.

Name of institution___.

Name and title of official reporting-

Date

I. THE DEVELOPMENT AND IMPLEMENTATION OF A PHILOSOPHY OF SCHOOL ADMINISTRATION

1. Have systematic efforts been made in your institution toward the cooperative development and faculty acceptance of a philosophy of school administration?

[blocks in formation]

a. Describe these efforts briefly. (Reply on separate sheet with number reference, I−1, a).

2. Has such effort resulted in basic agreements which offer a framework of objectives for the development of your education program for administrators?

Check:
Yes
Partially
No

3. Have these agreements been based upon researches and cooperations by

the following groups?

Check for "yes"

Faculty members
Graduate students

Local administrators..........

State administrators

Representative laymen

« PreviousContinue »