The Trial of Jesus of Nazareth
Renowned for its impeccable legal reasoning and lucid prose, this compelling study is based on a close reading of the four gospels. It reconstructs the accounts of Mathew, Mark, Luke and John and examines their discrepancies. The final two chapters put these accounts into the context of Jerusalem's legal and political environment. Radin's goal is not to pass judgment, but to reconstruct one of the most significant events in history, which he does with remarkable skill. Radin [1880-1950], the son of a rabbi, had a thorough education in Hebrew, Greek and Latin in addition to his legal training. A professor of law at Boalt Hall, Berkeley, he was a versatile scholar of jurisprudence and international, comparative and Roman law.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
accusation ancient apparent arrest Art thou assume authority Bar-Abbas believe betray Caiaphas called capital centuries certainly charge chief priests Christ Christian condemned conjecture Council crucified crucifixion death of Jesus disciples doctrine elders evidence examination execution eyewitness fact false feast Galilean Galilee give gospels Greek heard Herod Herodian high priest historical hostile incident inference Jerusalem Jesus answered Jews John Joseph of Arimathea Josephus Judas Judas Iscariot Judea King later legatus Luke Luke's Mark Mark's matter Matthew ment mentioned merely Messiah narrative offense official Palestine Passover person Peter Pharisees Pilate Pilate's Pontius Pilate popular probably procurator reason religious Roman governor Rome Sadducees saith unto Sanhedrin scarcely scourging scribes seems Sejanus smote soldiers sources spake statement story suppose sure Syria Talmud Temple tetrarch thee thew things Tiberius tion took tradition witnesses word writer