Page images
PDF
EPUB

are Jean Claude (d. 1687), author of the Essay on the Sermon, | and Jacques Saurin (d. 1730). In England the rivalry was not between Catholic and Reformer, but between Anglican and Nonconformist, or, if we may use the wide but less correct term, Puritan. On the one hand are Andrewes, Hall, Chillingworth, Jeremy Taylor, Barrow and South; on the other Baxter, Calamy, the Goodwins, Howe, Owen, Bunyan, in each case but a few names out of many. The sermons of these men were largely scriptural, the cardinal evangelical truths being emphasized with reality and vigour, but with a tendency to abstract theology rather than concrete religion. The danger was felt by the university of Cambridge, which in 1674 passed a statute forbidding its preachers to read their sermons.

Germany, harassed by the Thirty Years' War and deadened by a rigid Lutheranism, can show little besides Andrea and Johann Arndt until the coming of the Pietists (see PIETISM), A. H. Francke and Philipp Spencer, with Paul Gerhardt and his cousin Johann. The early years of the 18th century were a time of deadness as regards preaching. The Illumination in Germany and Deism in England were largely responsible for this, though the names of J. A. Bengel (better known as a commentator), Zinzendorf, Butler and the Erskines helped to redeem the time from the reproach of being the dark age of Protestantism. In the Roman Catholic Church the greatest force was Bridaine in France, a popular preacher of high worth. | But, generally speaking, there was no heart in preaching, sermons were unimpassioned, stilted and formal presentations of ethics and apologetics, seldom delivered extempore.

5. The Modern Period may be said to begin in 1738, the year in which John Wesley began his memorable work. Preaching once more was based on the Bible, which was expounded with force and earnestness, and though throughout the century there remained a good many pulpiteers who produced nothing but solemn fudge, the example and stimulus given by Wesley and Whitefield were almost immeasurably productive. Whitefield was the greater orator, Wesley the better thinker; but, diverse in temperament as they were, they alike laid emphasis on openair preaching. In their train came the great field preachers of Wales, like John Elias and Christmas Evans, and later the Primitive Methodists, who by their camp meetings and itinerancies kept religious enthusiasm alive when Wesleyan Methodism | was in peril of hardening. Meanwhile, in America the Puritan tradition, adapted to the new conditions, is represented by Cotton Mather, and later by Jonathan Edwards, the greatest preacher of his time and country. Whitefield's visits raised a band of pioneer preachers, cultured and uncultured, men who knew their Bibles but often interpreted them awry.

In the early 19th century the pulpit had a great power, especially in Wales, where it was the vehicle of almost every kind of knowledge. And it may be doubted whether, all in all, preaching has ever reached so uniformly high a level or been so powerful a force as during the 19th century, and this in spite of other forces similarly making for enlightenment and morality. It shared to the full in all the quickening that transformed so many departments of civilization during that epoch, and has been specially influenced by the missionary enterprise, the discoveries of science, the fuller knowledge of the Bible, the awakened zeal for social service. Modern preaching, like ancient preaching, has been so varied, depending, as it so largely does, on the personality of the preacher, that it is not possible to speak of its characteristics. Nor can one do more than enumerate a few outstanding modern names, exclusive of living preachers. In the Roman Catholic Church are the Italians Ventura and Curci, the Germans Diepenbrock and Foerster, the French Lacordaire, Dupanloup, Loyson (Père Hyacinthe) and Henri Didon. Of Protestants, Germany produced Schleiermacher, Claus Harms, Tholuck and F. W. Krummacher; France, Vinet and the Monods. In England representative Anglican preachers were Newman (whose best preaching preceded his obedience to Rome), T. Arnold, F. W. Robertson, Liddon, Farrar, Magee; of Free Churchmen, T. Binney, Thomas Jones, R. W. Dale and Joseph Parker (Congregationalist); Robert Hall, C. H. Spurgeon and Alexander

Maclaren (Baptists); W. M. Punshon, Hugh Price Hughes and Peter Mackenzie (Wesleyan); James Martineau (Unitarian). The Scottish Churches gave Edward Irving, Thos. Chalmers, R. S. Candlish, R. M. McCheyne and John Caird. In America, honoured names are those of W. E. Channing, Henry Ward Beecher, Horace Bushnell, Phillips Brooks, to mention only a few.

See J. M. Neale, Medieval Preachers and Preaching (1857); R. Rothe, Geschichte der Predigt vom Anfang bis auf Schleiermacher (1881); J. P. Mahaffy, Decay of Modern Preaching (1882); E. C. Durgan, A History of Preaching (1906), and preface to The Pulpit Encyclopaedia, vol. i. (1909); and the various volumes of the Yale Lectures on Preaching. Also SERMON. (A. J. G.)

"An

PREAMBLE (Med. Lat. praeambulum, from praeambulare, to walk before), an introductory statement, a preliminary explanation. The term is particularly applied to the opening paragraph of a statute which summarizes the intention of the legislature in passing the measure; thus the preamble of the statute, of which the title is the Children Act 1908, is as follows: Act to consolidate and amend the Law relating to the Protection of Children and Young Persons, Reformatory and Industrial Schools and Juvenile Offenders, and otherwise to amend the Law with respect to Children and Young Persons." The procedure in the British parliament differs in regard to the preambles of public and private bills. The second reading of a public bill affirms the principle, and therefore in committee the preamble stands postponed till after the consideration of the clauses, when it is considered in reference to those clauses as amended and altered if need be (Standing Order 35). On the other hand, the preamble of a private bill, if opposed, is considered first in committee, and counsel for the bill deals with the expediency of the bill, calls witnesses for the allegation in the preamble, and petitions against the bill are then heard; if the preamble is negatived the bill is dropped, if affirmed it is gone through clause by clause. On unopposed private bills the preamble has also to be proved, more especially with regard to whether the clauses required by the standing orders are inserted (see May, Parliamentary Practice, 1906, pp. 483, 808 seq.).

PREANGER, a residency of the island of Java, Dutch East Indies, bounded S. by the Indian Ocean, W. by Bantam, N. by Batavia and Krawang, and N.E. and E. by Cheribon and Banyumas. It is officially termed the Preanger Regencies, of which there are five, covering the several administrative divisions. It also includes the small island of Nusa Were. The natives are Sudanese. The whole residency is mountainous, but there are two main parallel ranges of peaks along the northern boundary and through the middle. Among these are to be found a singularly large number of both active and inactive volcanoes, including the well-known Salak and Gede in the north, and bunched together at the eastern end the Chikorai, Papandayan, Wayang, Malabar, Guntur, &c., ranging from 6000 to 10,000 ft. in height. The rivers of the province belong to the basins of the Indian Ocean and the Java Sea respectively, the water-parting being formed by the western and eastern ends respectively of the northern and southern lines of mountain peaks. The two which drain the largest basin are the Chi Manuk and the Chi Tarum, both rising in the eastern end of the province and flowing northcast and north-west respectively to the Java Sea. The Chi Tandui, also rising here, flows south-cast to the Indian Ocean, and alone of all the rivers in this province is navigable. Large stretches of marsh occur on each side of this river, as well as here and. there among the hills where inland lakes formerly existed, as, for instance, near Bandung. Crater lakes are Telaga (lake) Budas, in the crater of the volcano of the same name in the south-east, and Telaga Warna, on the slopes of the Gede, famous for its beautiful tinting. On the same side of the Gede is the health resort of Sindanglaya (founded 1850-1860), with a mineral spring containing salt, and close by is the country residence of Chipanas, belonging to the governor general.

Numerous warm springs are scattered about this volcanic region. Petroleum and coal have been worked, and there is a rich yield of chalk, while a good quality of bricks is made from the

red clay. The soil is in general very fertile, the principal products | of the Cambrian (some geologists speak of certain pre-Olenellus being rice, maize and pulse (kachang) in the lower grounds, and beds as co-Cambrian); the lower limit has not yet been generally cinchona, coffee and tea, as well as cocoa, tobacco and fibrous established, though it is sufficiently clear in certain regions. plants in the hills. The coffee cultivation has, however, consider-The rocks of this period are much more obviously of sedimentary ably diminished. Forest culture, mat-making, weaving and origin than those of the Archean; they include conglomerates, fish-breeding are also practised, the last-named in the marshes sandstones, greywackes, quartzites, slates, limestones and after the rice harvest. The plantations are almost entirely dolomites, which appear to have been formed under conditions owned by the government and Europeans, but the rice mills similar to those which obtained in later epochs. Although the are in the hands of Chinese. Irrigation works have been carried sediments prevail, they are often very highly metamorphosed out in various parts. The principal towns are Bandung, the and distorted by crustal movements; igneous rocks occur in capital of the residency, Sukabumi, Chianjar, Sumedang, great bulk in some regions. Fossils are usually extremely rare Chichalengka, Garut, Tasik Malaya and Manon Jaya, all with and very ill-preserved; but indications of protozoa, coelenterates, the exception of Sumedang connected by railway. echinoderms, molluscoids, mollusca, worms and arthropods have been distinguished. The name pre-Cambrian is the equivalent of the "Algonklan" of the United States Geological Survey, and of the "Proterozoic " of other American authorities; the terms eozoic, archaeozoic, agnotozoic, cryptozoic, eparchaic and others have also been applied to the same period.

PREBENDARY (Lat. praebendo-give or grant, through Low Lat. praebenda), one who holds a prebend, namely an endowment in land, or pension in money, given to a cathedral or conventual church in praebendam-that is, for the maintenance of a secular priest or regular canon. In the early Church the title had a more general signification. The word praebenda originally signified the daily rations given to soldiers, whence it passed to indicate daily distributions of food and drink to monks, canons, &c. It became a frequent custom to grant such a prebend from the resources of a monastery to certain poor people or to the founder. Such persons were, literally, prebendaries. At a later date, when the custom in collegiate churches of living in common had become less general, a certain amount of the church revenue was divided among the clergy serving such a church, and each portion (no longer of meat or drink only) was called a prebend. The clergy of such churches were generally canons, and the titles canon and prebendary were, and are, sometimes used as synonymous. A member of such a college is a canon in virtue of the spiritual duties which he has to perform, and the assignation to him of a stall in choir and a place in chapter; he is a prebendary in virtue of his benefice. In the Roman Catholic Church the duties of a prebendary as such generally consist in his attendance at choral office in his church. In the Anglican Church he usually bears his part in the conducting of the ordinary church services, except when he has a vicar, as in the old cathedral foundations (see CATHEDRAL). A prebendary may be either simple or a dignitary. In the former case he has no cure and no more than his revenue for his support; in the latter he has always a jurisdiction annexed. In the Anglican Church the bishop is of common right patron of all prebends, and if a prebend is in the gift of a lay patron he must present his candidate to the bishop who institutes as to other benefices. No person may hold more than one prebend in the same church; therefore, if a prebendary accepts a deanery in his church his prebend becomes void by cession. A prebend is practically a sinecure, and the holder has no cure of souls as such. He may, and often does, accept a parochial office or chaplaincy in addition.

In the middle ages there were many less regular kinds of prebends: e.g. praebenda doctoralis, with which teaching duties were connected, praebenda lectoralis, praebenda missae, to which the duty of saying a certain number of masses was attached, praebenda mortuaria, founded for the saying of masses for the dead. Chantries belonged to this class. All these prebends were generally assigned to special holders, but there were also praebendae currentes, which were not held by any persons in particular. Sometimes prebends were held by❘ boys who sang in choir, praebendae pueriles. Occasionally the name of prebendary was applied to those servants in a monastery who attended to the food. In England the word prebendary was sometimes used as synonymous with prebend, as prebend was occasionally used for prebendary. Du Cange, Glossarium mediae et infimae latinitatis, ed. L. Favre (Niort, 1883, &c.); Migne, Encyclopédie théologique, Ist series, vol. x. (s. Droit Canon); Sir R. J. Phillimore, Ecclesiastical Law of the Church of England (2nd ed., 1895). (E. O'N.) PRE-CAMBRIAN, in geology, the enormously long and indistinctly defined period of time anterior to the Cambrian period. In the restricted sense in which it is now often employed it embraces a period or group of periods subsequent to the Archean (q.v.) and anterior to the Cambrian, although some writers still prefer to include the former. The superior limit of pre-Cambrian rocks is fixed by the Olenellus fauna at the base

Three or more great stratigraphical breaks have been recognized within the system of pre-Cambrian rocks; but how far these breaks synchronize in widely separated regions where they are found is difficult to determine in the absence of good palaeontological evidence.

Britain is the Torridonian (q.v.) group of the north-west highlands The most striking development of pre-Cambrian rocks in Great of Scotland, which lies with strong unconformability between the Lewisian gneiss and the basal quartzite of the Cambrian. The Eastern or Dalradian (q.v.) schists of Scotland and their equivalents in Ireland and Anglesey may be, in part at least, of the same age. remnant of an ancient ridge now forming the Longmynd and the In Shropshire, in the neighbourhood of the Welsh border, is the smaller hills to the west, Caer Caradoc, the Wrekin, and the Cardington Hills. The latter are built mainly of much altered porphyries and tuffs which C. Callaway named the Uriconian series; this series slates forming the Longmynd cannot yet be definitely assigned to is clearly of pre-Cambrian age. The great mass of grits, flags and this period, though they may be provisionally retained here under Callaway's name, Londmyndian. Probably contemporaneous with the Uriconian are the volcanic series of Barnt Green, Licky Hill and here. In the Charnwood Forest a group of crystalline rocks, named Caldecote. The micaceous schists of Rushton (Salop) may be placed Charnian by W. W. Watts, rises up in the form of small hills amid the surrounding Trias; they are classed as follows in descending order: The Brand series, including the slates of Swithland and Maplewell series, including the olive hornstones of Bradgate, the Groby, quartzite and conglomerate and purple and green beds; the Woodhouse beds, the slate-agglomerate of Roecliffe, the Beacon Hill hornstones and a felspathic agglomerate; and the Blackbrook series of grits and hornstones. The ancient volcanic rocks of St Davids, Pembrokeshire, were formerly regarded by H. Hicks as of pre-Cambrian age, in which he recognized a lower, "Dimetian," a middle, "Arvonian," and an upper," Pebidian," series. The preCambrian age of these rocks was for a long time disputed, but J. F. N. Green (Q. J. Geol. Soc., 1908, 64, p. 363) made it clear that (Trachytic group), and that Hicks's Dimetian," the St Davids there is an Upper Pebidian (Rhyolitic group), and a Lower Pebidian granophyre, is a laccolitic mass intrusive in the Pebidian. Both the Pebidian volcanic rocks and the intruded granophyre are separated from the Cambrian by an unconformity.

In Finno-Scandinavia pre-Cambrian rocks are well developed. In the Scandinavian mountain ranges are the Seve and Sparagmite formations; the latter, a coarse-grained felspathic sandstone, is very similar to the Torridonian of Scotland; it occurs also in Enontekis in Finland. Next in descending order come the Jotnian sandstones (2000 metres), which retain ripple-marks; they are associated with conglomerates and slates and intrusive diabase and the Rapakiwi granite. The Jotnian group rests unconformably upon the Jatulian quartzites and schists, with slates, dolomite and carbonaceous beds (north of Lake Onega is a bed of anthracite 2 metres thick). Outflows of diabase and gabbro occur in this series, which is from 1600 to 2000 metres in thickness. Below the Jatulian is another group of schistose sediments, the Kalevian, more strongly folded than the former and separated from the groups above and below by unconformable junctions. These rocks are regarded by J. J. Sederholm as older than the Huronian of North America (possibly analogous to the Keewatin formation), and yet several groups of sediments in this region (Botnian schists, &c.) lie between the Kalevian series and the granitic (Archean) complex. thickness in North America; all types of sediment are represented Pre-Cambrian rocks occupy large areas and attain an enormous

in various stages of metamorphism, and with these are igneous rocks, often developed upon a vast scale. They have been subdivided into the following groups or formations: an upper Keweenawan

and a lower Huronian group; the latter is subdivided into an upper Animikean (north-east Minnesota) or Penokean (north-west Wisconsin); a middle and a lower division. Each of these four groups is separated by marked unconformity from the rocks above and below. Huronian rocks are well developed in the following districts: the Marquette region of northern Michigan, comprising quartzites, slates and conglomerates, with important iron-bearing slates and schists and ferruginous cherts; in the Menominee district of Michigan and Wisconsin similar rocks occur; the Penokee-Gogebic district of Wisconsin and Michigan comprises quartzites, shales and limestones, with beds and dikes of diabase and olivine-gabbro; the same rocks occur in the Crystal Falls, north Michigan; the Mesabi and Vermilion districts, Minnesota, and north of Lake Michigan rock groups of this age take an important place. The valuable iron ores of Mesabi, Penokee-Gogebic and Menominee belong mainly to the Animikean group; in the Penokee rocks of this age vast thicknesses of igneous rocks constitute the greater part of the formation, The Keweenawan rocks are said to attain the enormous thickness of 50,000 ft.; the higher beds are mainly sandy sediments and conglomerates; in the lower portions are great igneous masses, gabbros, diabase and porphyries; thus in the St Croix valley, northwest Wisconsin and Minnesota, no fewer than 65 lava flows and 5 conglomeratic beds have been counted, which together aggregate some 20,000 ft. in thickness. Some of these lava flows appear to have been due to fissure eruptions. The native copper deposits of this age in north Michigan are the most extensive known.

Pre-Cambrian rocks occupy large areas and reach great thicknesses in the eastern provinces of Canada; in Newfoundland 10,000 ft. of strata lie between the Archean and Cambrian (the Terranovian series of South Hunt; Avalon group of others); similar rocks occur also north of the Great Lakes and in the Hudson Bay region. They are found also in great force in the Colorado Canyon, in the Adirondack Mountains, and Black Hills of S. Dakota and elsewhere. Turning to Europe, we find pre-Cambrian rocks in Brittany, the "phyllades de Saint Lô," or Briovérian of Chas. Barrois; and along the western border of France and south-west of the central massif In the Fichtelgebirge, the Silesian mountains and east Thuringia similar rocks occur; the Przibramer Schiefer of Lipold and rocks in J. Barrande's stage A are of this age. Probably the metamor. phosed eruptive rocks on the southern border of the Hunsrück and Taunus are pre-Cambrian. Large tracts of metamorphic sedimentary rocks that may be classed here are found in Shantung and north China, and probably also in Brazil, India and Australia. In South Africa the gold-bearing Witwatersrand beds of the Transvaal and the overlying Ventersdorp and Potchefstroom systems; the Griqualand system and Cango and Ibeques systems of Cape Colony, all occur above Archean rocks and below those of Devonian age; they cannot as yet, therefore, be classed as pre-Cambrian and their age

is still uncertain.

Little can be said of the climatic conditions of this remote period, the fossil evidence being so poor; but it is of interest to note that in certain regions, viz. in the Lake Huron region, in the Gaisa series of Varanger Fjord, Norway, and in the Yangtse district in China, conglomerate beds are found in which many of the boulders are scratched like those of the Dwyka beds of South Africa, and thus suggest the possibility of glacial conditions at some stages of the period.

For literature see Geological Literature added to the Geological Society's Library (annual). (J. A. H.) PRECARIOUS, literally, held on the good-will of another, or on entreaty (Lat. prex, precis, prayer) to another. The word is used, in law, of a tenure of land, office, &c., held at the pleasure of another. In general usage it has the significance of something uncertain, dangerous or risky.

PRECEDENCE (from Lat. praecedere, to go before, precede). This word in the sense in which it is here employed means priority of place, or superiority of rank, in the conventional system of arrangement under which the more eminent and dignified orders of the community are classified on occasions of public ceremony and in the intercourse of private life. In the United Kingdom there is no complete and comprehensive code whereby the scheme of social gradation has been defined and settled, once and for all, on a sure and lasting foundation. The principles and rules at present controlling it have been formulated at different periods and have been derived from various sources. The Crown is the fountain of honour, and it is its undoubted prerogative to confer on any of its subjects, in any part of its dominions, such titles and distinctions and such rank and place as to it may seem meet and convenient. Its discretion in this respect is altogether unbounded at common law, and is limited in those cases only wherein it has been submitted to restraint

by act of parliament. In the old time all questions of precedence came in the ordinary course of things within the jurisdiction of the court of chivalry, in which the lord high constable and earl marshal presided as judges, and of which the kings of arms, heralds and pursuivants were the assessors and executive officers. When, however, points of unusual moment and magnitude happened to be brought into controversy, they were occasionally considered and decided by the sovereign in person, or by a special commission, or by the privy council, or even by the parliament itself. But it was not until towards the middle of the 16th century that precedence was made the subject of any legislation in the proper meaning of the term.1

[ocr errors]

In 1539 an act “for the placing of the Lords in Parliament " (31 Hen. VIII. c. 10) was passed at the instance of the king, and by it the relative rank of the members of the royal family, of the great officers of state and the household, and of the hierarchy and the peerage was definitely and definitively ascertained. In 1563 an act "for declaring the authority of the Lord Keeper of the Great Seal and the Lord Chancellor to be the same (5 Eliz. c. 18) also declared their precedence to be the same. Questions concerning the precedence of peers are mentioned in the Lords Journals 4 & 5 Ph. and M. and 39 Eliz., but in the reign of James I. such questions were often referred to the commissioners for executing the office of earl marshal. In the reign of Charles I. the House of Lords considered several questions of precedency and objected in the earl of Banbury's case to warrants overruling the statute of 31 Hen. VIII. In 1689 an act "for enabling Lords Commissioners of the Great Seal to execute the office of Lord Chancellor or Lord Keeper" (1 Will. and Mary c. 21) gave to the commissioners not being peers of the realm place next to the speaker of the House of Commons and to the speaker place next to the peers of the realm. In 1707 the Act of Union with Scotland (6 Anne c. 11) provided that all peers of Scotland should be peers of Great Britain' and should have rank immediately after the peers of the like degrees in England at the time of the union and before all peers of Great Britain of the like degrees created after the union. In 1800 the Act of Union with Ireland (39 & 40 Geo. III. c. 67) provided that the lords spiritual of Ireland should have rank immediately after the lords spiritual of the same degree in Great Britain, and that the lords temporal of Ireland should have rank immediately after the lords temporal of the same degree in Great Britain at the time of the union, and further that "peerages of Ireland created after the union should have precedence with peerages of the United Kingdom created after the union according to the dates of their creation." At different times too during the current century several statutes have been passed for the reform and extension of the judicial organization which have very materially affected the precedence of the judges, more especially the Judicature Act of 1873 (36 & 37 Vict. c. 66), under which the lords justices of appeal and the justices of the High Court now receive their appointments. But the statute of Henry VIII. "for the placing of the Lords" still remains the only legislative measure in which it has been attempted to deal directly and systematically with any large and important section of the scale of general precedence; and the law, so far as it relates to the ranking of the sovereign's immediate kindred whether lineal or collateral, the principal ministers of the Crown and court, and both the spiritual and temporal members of the House of Lords, is to all practical intents and purposes what it was made by that statute nearly 350 years ago. Where no act of parliament applies precedence is determined either by the will-and pleasure of the sovereign or by what is accepted as "ancient usage and established

Ample materials for the satisfaction of the curiosity of those who are desirous of investigating the history of precedence under its wider and more remote aspects will be found in such writers as Selden or Mackenzie, together with the authorities quoted or referred to by them: Selden, Tilles of Honor, pt. ii. p. 740 seq. (London, 1672); Mackenzie, Observations upon The Laws and Customs of Nations as to Precedency (Edinburgh, 1680; and also reprinted in Guillim, Display of Heraldry, 6th ed., London, 1724).

For the parliamentary rights of Scottish peers see article

PEERAGE

1.-General Precedence of Men.

The sovereign; (1) prince of Wales; (2) younger sons of the sovereign; (3) grandsons of the sovereign; (4) brothers of the sovereign; (5) uncles of the sovereign; (6) nephews of the sovereign; (7) ambassadors; (8) archbishop of Canterbury, primate of all England; (9) lord high chancellor of Great Britain or lord keeper of the great seal; (10) archbishop of York, primate of England;7 (11) prime minister; (12) lord high treasurer of Great Selden, Titles of Honor, pt. ii. p. 753.

custom." Of the sovereign's will and pleasure the appropri- | executing the office of earl marshal; and the "Roll of the King's ate method of announcement is by warrant under the sign- Majesty's most Royal Proceeding through London" from the manual, or letters patent under the great seal. But, although Tower to Whitehall on the eve of the coronation of James I., the Crown has at all periods very frequently conceded special also arranged by the commissioners for executing the office of privileges of rank and place to particular persons, its interference earl marshal. On many isolated points, too, of more or less with the scale of general precedence has been rare and excep- importance, special declaratory decisions have been from time tional. In 1540 it was provided by warrant from Henry VIII. to time propounded by the carls marshal, their substitutes and that certain officers of the household therein named should deputies; for example, in 1594, when the younger sons of dukes precede the secretaries of state when and if they were under were placed before viscounts; in 1625, when the rank of knights the degree of barons. In 1612 James I. directed by letters of the Bath and their wives was fixed; and in 1615 and 1677, patent, not without long and elaborate argument in the Star when the eldest sons of the younger sons of peers were placed Chamber, that baronets, then newly created, should be ranked before the eldest sons of knights and of baronets. It is from after the younger sons of viscounts and barons, and that a these miscellaneous sources that the precedence among others number of political and judicial functionaries should be ranked of all peeresses, the eldest sons and their wives and the daughters between knights of the Garter and such knights bannerets as of all peers, and the younger sons and their wives of all dukes, should be made by the sovereign in person "under his standard marquesses and earls is ascertained and established. And displayed in an army royal in open war."2 Four years later further, for the purpose of proving continuity of practice and he further directed, also by letters patent, that the sons of disposing of minor questions not otherwise and more conclusively baronets and their wives and the daughters of baronets should set at rest, the official programmes and accounts preserved by be placed before the sons of knights and their wives and the the heralds of different public solemnities and processions, such daughters of knights "of what degree or order soever." And as coronations, royal marriages, state funerals, national thanksagain in 1620 the same king commanded by warrant after givings and so on, have always been considered to be of great solemn argument before his majesty" that the younger sons of historical and technical value. earls should precede knights of the privy council and knights of the Garter not being "barons or of a higher degree." If we add to these ordinances the provisions relating to precedence contained in the statutes of several of the orders of knighthood which since then have been instituted or reconstructed, we shall nearly, if not quite, exhaust the catalogue of the interpositions of the sovereign with regard to the rank and place of classes as distinguished from individuals. Of "ancient usage and established custom the records of the College of Arms furnish the fullest and most trustworthy evidence. Among them in particular there is a collection of early tables of precedence which were published by authority at intervals from the end of the 14th to the end of the 15th century, and to which peculiar weight has been attached by many successive generations of heralds. On them, indeed, as illustrative of and supplementary to the action of parliament and the Crown, all subsequent tables of precedence have been in great measure founded. The oldest is the "Order of All Estates of Nobles and Gentry," prepared apparently for the coronation of Henry IV. in 1399, under the supervision of Ralph Nevill, earl of Westmorland and carl marshal; and the next is the "Order of All States of Worship and Gentry," prepared, as announced in the heading, for the coronation of Henry VI. in 1429, under the supervision of the lord protector Humphrey, duke of Gloucester, and the earl marshal, John Mowbray, duke of Norfolk. Two more are of the reign of Edward IV., and were severally issued by John Tiptoft, earl of Worcester and lord high constable, in 1467, and by Anthony Widvile, Earl Rivers and lord high constable, in 1479. The latest is commonly and shortly known as the "Series Ordinum," and was drawn up by a special commission presided over by Jasper Tudor, duke of Bedford, it is presumed for observance at the marriage of Henry VII. and Elizabeth of York in 1486. To these may be added the "Order for the Placing of Lords and Ladies," taken at a grand entertainment given by command of Henry VIII. at the king's manor-house of Richmond in 1520 by Charles Somerset, earl of Worcester, lord chamberlain of the household, to the French ambassador, Olivier de la Vernade, seigneur de la Bâtie; the "Precedency of All Estates," arranged in 1594 by the commissioners for 1 Quoted by Sir Charles Young from State Papers: published by Authority (4to, 1830), p. 623, in Privy Councillors and their Precedence (1850), p. 15. 2 Patent Rolls, 10th Jac., pt. x. mem. 8. It is commonly stated that the bannerets here referred to could be made by the prince of Wales as well as by the king. But the privilege was conferred by James I. on Henry, the then prince of Wales, only (Selden, Titles of Honor, pt. ii. p. 750).

Ibid., 14th jac., part ii. mem. 24; Selden, Titles of Honor, part ii. p. 752. Cited by Sir Charles Young, Order of Precedence, with Authorities and Remarks, p. 27 (London, 1851).

their relationship to the reigning sovereign and not on their relation-
The precedence of the members of the royal family depends on
ship to any of the predecessors of the reigning sovereign. It is pro-
vided by 31 Hen. VIII. c. 10 that no person, "except only the King's
children," shall have place" at the side of the Cloth of Estate in the
Parliament Chamber," and that "the King's Son, the King's Brother,
the King's Nephew, or the King's Brother's or Sister's Sons," shall
have place before all prelates, great officers of state and peers. Lord
Chief Justice Coke was of opinion that the king's nephew meant the
king's grandson or nepos (Institutes, vol. iv. ch. 77). But, as Mr Justice
Blackstone says,
grandsons are held to be included without having recourse to Sir
"under the description of the King's children his
Edward Coke's interpretation of nephew " (Commentaries,vol. i. ch. 4).
Besides, if grandson is to be understood by nephew, the king's grand-
son would be placed after the king's brother. The prince of Wales
Lords" but, as he is always, whether the son or the grandson of the
is not specifically mentioned in the statute "for the placing of the
sovereign, the heir-apparent to the Crown, he is ranked next to the
sovereign or the queen-consort. With the exception of the prince of
Wales, all the male relations of the sovereign are ranked first in the
order of their degrees of consanguinity with him or her, and secondly,
in the order of their proximity to the succession to the Crown; thus
the members of the several groups into which the royal family is
divided take precedence according to their own seniority and the
seniority of their fathers or mothers, the sons of the sons or brothers
of the sovereign being preferred to the sons of the daughters or sisters
of the sovereign among the sovereign's grandsons and nephews.
By 31 Hen. VIII. c. 10, the king's vicegerent "for good and
due ministration of justice in all causes and cases touching the
ecclesiastical jurisdiction is placed immediately before the arch-
bishop of Canterbury. The office of vicegerent or vicar-general was
then held by Thomas, Lord Cromwell, afterwards carl of Essex,
together with that of lord privy seal, and it was never conferred on
any other person. By the Act of Union with Ireland the archbishops
of Ireland had place next to the archbishops of England, and if
consecrated before and not after the disestablishment of the Church
in Ireland they retain this position under the Irish Church Act of
1869. At the coronation of William IV. the lord chancellor of
Ireland walked next after the lord chancellor of Great Britain and
before the lord president of the council and lord privy seal. In
Ireland, if he is a peer he has precedence between the archbishops
of Armagh and Dublin, and if he is not a peer after the archbishop
of Dublin. But, except in the House of Lords, the precedence of
the lord chancellor of Great Britain or the lord keeper of the great
seal is the same whether he is a peer or a commoner. The lord
keeper has the same precedence as the lord chancellor under 5 Eliz.
c. 18. But the last appointment to the lord keepership was that
of Sir Robert Henley, afterwards Lord Henley, lord chancellor, and
earl of Northington, in 1757, and the office is not likely to be revived.

4

Britain; (13) lord president of the privy council; (14) lord keeper of the privy seal;' (15) lord great chamberlain of England; (16) lord high constable of England; (17) earl marshal; (18) lord high admiral, (19) lord steward of the household; (20) lord chamberlain of the household, above peers of their own degree; (21) dukes; (22) marquesses; (23) dukes' eldest sons; (24) earls; (25) marquesses' eldest sons; (26) dukes' younger sons; (27) viscounts, (28) earls' eldest sons; (29) marquesses' younger The lord president of the council and the lord privy seal, if they are peers, are placed by 31 Hen. VIII. c. 10 before all dukes except dukes related to the sovereign in one or other of the degrees of consanguinity specified in the act. And, since the holders of these offices have been and are always peers, their proper precedence if they are commoners has never been determined.

sons; (30) bishops; (31) barons;3 (32) speaker of the House of Commons; (33) commissioners of the great seal; (34) treasurer of the household; (35) comptroller of the household; (36) master of the horse; (37) vice-chamberlain of the household; (38) secretaries of state;' (39) viscounts' eldest sons; (40) earls' younger sons; (41) barons' eldest sons; (42) knights of the Garter; (43) privy councillors; (44) chancellor of the exchequer; (45) chancellor of the duchy of Lancaster; (46) lord chief it hath been accustomed." As Lord Chief Justice Coke and Mr Justice Blackstone observe, the degrees of consanguinity with the sovereign to which precedence is given by 31 Hen. VIII. c. 10 are the same as those within which it was made high treason by 28 Hen. VIII. c. 18 for any man to contract marriage without the consent of the king. Queen Victoria, by letters patent under the great seal It is provided by 31 Hen. VIII. c. 10 that "the Great Chamber-in 1865, ordained that, "besides the children of Sovereigns of these lain, the Constable, the Marshal, the Lord Admiral, the Grand Master realms, the children of the sons of any of the Sovereigns of Great or Lord Steward, and the King's Chamberlain shall sit and be placed Britain and Ireland shall have and at all times hold and enjoy the after the Lord Privy Seal in manner and form following: that is to style or attribute of Royal Highness' with their titular dignity say, every one of them shall sit and be placed above all other person- of Prince or Princess prefixed to their respective Christian names, ages being of the same estates or degrees that they shall happen to or with their other titles of honour." But, notwithstanding this, be of, that is to say the Great Chamberlain first, the Constable next, their rank and place are still governed by the act for the placing of the Marshal third, the Lord Admiral the fourth, the Grand Master the Lords. The duke of Cumberland has no precedence as a cousin or Lord Steward the fifth, and the King's Chamberlain the sixth." of the king, being the grandson of a son of George III. and would The office of lord high steward of England, then under attainder, is not be a "Royal Highness" at all if his father had not been, like not mentioned in the act for the placing of the Lords, "because it his grandfather, king of Hanover. In Garter's Roll of the Lords was intended," Lord Chief Justice Coke says, "that when the use Spiritual and Temporal, the official list of the House of Lords, the of him should be necessary he should not endure longer than hac vice" duke of Cumberland is entered in the precedence of his dukedom (Inst. iv. 77). But it may be noted that, when his office is called after the duke of Northumberland. Under the combined operation out of abeyance for coronations or trials by the House of Lords, the of the act for the placing of the Lords and the Acts of Union with lord high steward is the greatest of all the great officers of state in Scotland (art. 23) and with Ireland (art. 4), peers of the same degrees, England. The office of lord great chamberlain of England is as dukes, marquesses, earls, viscounts and barons, severally, have hereditary in the coheirs of the last duke of Ancaster, who inherited precedence according to priority in the creation of their respective it from the De Veres, earls of Oxford, in whose line it had descended peerages. But peerages of England created before 1707 precede from the reign of Henry I. The office of lord high constable of peerages of Scotland created before 1707, peerages of Great Britain England, also under attainder, is called out of abeyance for and created between 1707 and 1801 precede peerages of Ireland created pending coronations only. The office of earl marshal is hereditary before 1801, and peerages of Ireland created before 1801 precede in the Howards, dukes of Norfolk, premier dukes and, as earls of peerages of the United Kingdom and of Ireland created after 1801, Arundel, premier earls of England, under a grant in special tail male which take precedence in common. The relative precedence of the from Charles II. in 1672. The office of lord high admiral, like the members of the House of Lords, including the representative peers office of lord high treasurer, is practically extinct as a dignity. Since of Scotland and Ireland, is officially set forth in Garter's roll, which the reign of Queen Anne there has been only one lord high admiral, is prepared by the Garter king of arms at the commencement of each namely, William, duke of Clarence, afterwards William IV., for a session of parliament, that of the Scottish peers generally in the few months in the Canning administration of 1827. The lord steward Union Roll, and that of the Irish peers generally in Ulster's Roll, a and the lord chamberlain of the household are always peers, and record which is under the charge of and is periodically corrected have seldom been under the degree of earls. We may here remark by the Ulster king of arms. The Union Roll is founded on the that both the Scottish and Irish Acts of Union make no reference Decreet of Ranking" pronounced and promulgated by a royal to the precedence of the great officers of state of Scotland and Ireland. commission in 1606, which, in the words of an eminent authority Not to mention the prince of Wales, who is by birth steward of Scot- in such matters, "was adopted at once as the roll of the peers in land, the earl of Shrewsbury is hereditary great seneschal of Ireland; Parliament, convention and all public meetings, and continued to the duke of Argyll is hereditary master of the household; the earl be called uninterruptedly with such alterations upon it as judgments of Errol is hereditary lord high constable of Scotland; but what of the Court of Session upon appeal in modification of the precedency places they are entitled to in the scale of general precedence is alto- of certain peers rendered necessary, with the omission of such gether doubtful and uncertain. In Ireland the great seneschal dignities as became extinct and with the addition from time to ranks after the lord chancellor if he is a commoner, and after the time of newly created peerages down to the last sitting of the archbishop of Dublin if the lord chancellor is a peer, and in both Scottish Parliament on the 1st of May 1707" (The Earldom of Mar, cases before dukes ("Order of precedence," Dublin Gazette, June 3. &c., by the earl of Crawford (25th) and Balcarres (8th), ii. 16). 1843). Again, on George IV.'s visit to Edinburgh in 1821, the lord high constable had place as the first subject in Scotland immediately after the members of the royal family. At every coronation from that of George III. to that of Queen Victoria, the lord high constable of Scotland has been placed next to the earl marshal of England, and, although no rank has been assigned on these occasions to the hereditary great seneschal of Ireland, the lord high constable of Ireland appointed for the ceremony has been at all or most of them placed next to the lord high constable of Scotland. It is worthy of notice, however, that Sir George Mackenzie, writing when lord advocate of Scotland in the reign of Charles II., says that "the Constable and Marischal take not place as Officers of the Crown but according to their creation as Earls," and he moreover expresses the opinion that "it seems very strange that these who ride upon the King's right and left hand when he returns from his Parliaments and who guard the Parliament itself, and the Honours, should have no precedency by their offices" (Observations, &c., p. 25, in Guillim's Display of Heraldry, p. 461 seq.; but see also Wood-Douglas, Peerage of Scotland, i. 557).

Both Sir Charles Young and Sir Bernard Burke place " Dukes of the Blood Royal" before dukes, their eldest sons before marquesses, and their younger sons before marquesses' eldest sons. In the "Ancient Tables of Precedence," which we have already cited, dukes of the blood royal am always ranked before other dukes, and in most of them their eldest sons and in some of them their younger sons are placed in a corresponding order of precedence. But in this connexion the words of the act for the placing of the Lords are perfectly plain and unambiguous: "All Dukes not aforementioned," i.e. all except only such as shall happen to be the king's son, the king's brother, the king's uncle, the king's nephew, or the king's brother's or sister's son. "Marquesses, Earls, Viscounts and Barons, not having any of the offices aforesaid. shall sit and be placed after their ancienty as

Eldest sons of peers of any given degree are of the same rank as, but are to be placed immediately after, peers of the first degree under that of their fathers; and the younger sons of peers of any given degree are of the same rank, but are to be placed after peers of the second degree and the eldest sons of peers of the first degree under that of their fathers.

'Secretaries of state, if they are barons, precede all other barons under 31 Hen. VIII. c. 10. But if they are of any higher degree their rank is not influenced by their official position.

Under Will. and Mary, c. 21, being the only commissioners for the execution of any office who have precedence assigned to them.

The officers of the household who, under Henry VIII.'s warrant of 1540, precede the secretaries of state have been for a long time always peers or the sons of peers, with personal rank higher, and usually far higher, than their official rank. The practical result is, seeing also that the great seal is only very rarely indeed in commission, that the secretaries of state, when they are commoners whose personal precedence is below a baron's, have official precedence immediately after the speaker of the House of Commons. The principal secretaries, for so they are all designated, are officially equal to one another in dignity, and are placed among themselves according to seniority of appointment.

During more than two centuries only one commoner has been indebted for his precedence to his election into the order, and that was Sir Robert Walpole, the minister, who at the coronation of George II. in 1727 was placed as a knight of the Garter immediately before privy councillors. The proper precedence of both knights of the Thistle and knights of St Patrick is undecided.

Privy councillors of Great Britain and of Ireland take precedence in common according to priority of admission. The chancellors of the exchequer and of the duchy of Lancaster, the lord chief justice

« PreviousContinue »