Free Speech, The People's Darling Privilege: Struggles for Freedom of Expression in American History
Modern ideas about the protection of free speech in the United States did not originate in twentieth-century Supreme Court cases, as many have thought. Free Speech, “The People’s Darling Privilege” refutes this misconception by examining popular struggles for free speech that stretch back through American history. Michael Kent Curtis focuses on struggles in which ordinary and extraordinary people, men and women, black and white, demanded and fought for freedom of speech during the period from 1791—when the Bill of Rights and its First Amendment bound only the federal government to protect free expression—to 1868, when the Fourteenth Amendment sought to extend this mandate to the states. A review chapter is also included to bring the story up to date.
Curtis analyzes three crucial political struggles: the controversy that surrounded the 1798 Sedition Act, which raised the question of whether criticism of elected officials would be protected speech; the battle against slavery, which raised the question of whether Americans would be free to criticize a great moral, social, and political evil; and the controversy over anti-war speech during the Civil War. Many speech issues raised by these controversies were ultimately decided outside the judicial arena—in Congress, in state legislatures, and, perhaps most importantly, in public discussion and debate. Curtis maintains that modern proposals for changing free speech doctrine can usefully be examined in the light of this often ignored history. This broader history shows the crucial effect that politicians, activists, ordinary citizens—and later the courts—have had on the American understanding of free speech.
Filling a gap in legal history, this enlightening, richly researched historical investigation will be valuable for students and scholars of law, U.S. history, and political science, as well as for general readers interested in civil liberties and free speech.
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
The English and Colonial Background
The Debate over the Sedition Act of 1798
Sedition in the Courts Enforcement and Its Aftermath
Sedition Reflections and Transitions
The Declaration the Constitution Slavery and Abolition
Shall Abolitionists Be Silenced?
Congress Confronts the Abolitionists The Post Office and Petitions
After Lovejoy Transformations
The Free Speech Battle over Helpers Impending Crisis
Daniel Worth The Struggle for Free Speech in North Carolina on the Eve of the Civil War
The Struggle for Free Speech in the Civil War Lincoln and Vallandigham
The Free Speech Tradition Confronts the War Power
A New Birth of Freedom? The Fourteenth Amendment and the First Amendment
Where Are They Now? A Very Quick Review of Suppression Theories in the Twentieth Century
Other editions - View all
abolition abolitionists abridge action Adams advocated American antislavery argued argument arrest attack Bill of Rights blacks Boston called cause charged citizens Civil claim common Cong Congress Constitution Court criticism dangerous debate defense demanded Democrats denied discussion election Emancipator equal expression federal Federalists Fourteenth Amendment Free Press free speech freedom of speech Globe guarantees hereafter House ideas insisted issue James John judges jury Justice legislature Letter Levellers libel liberty limited Lincoln Lovejoy matter meaning meeting ment newspaper North Northern opinion party passed person petition political popular Post president principles privileges prosecutions protection published punish question quoting reason rejected Representative Republicans resolutions rule secured Sedition Act Senator Sess slave slavery Society South Southern suggested suppression supra note Supreme Court theory thought tion tradition trial truth United Vallandigham violation Virginia wrote York