 Was it part of the injured person's employment to hazard, to suffer, or to do that which caused his injury? If yea, the accident arose out of his employment. If nay, it did not, because what it was not part of the employment to hazard, to suffer, or to...  The Scots Law Times - Page 681919Full view - About this book
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1927 - 1244 pages
...arises upon the very words of the statute, and it is generally of some real assistance. It is this: Was it part of the injured person's employment to...hazard, to suffer, or to do that which caused his injury ? If yea, the accident arose out of his ehiployment. If nay, it did not, because what it was not. part... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 1260 pages
...arises upon the very words of the statute, and it is generally of some real assistance. It is this: Was it part of the injured person's employment to hazard, to suffer, or to do that which caused his injury;1 If yea, the accident arose out of his employment. If nay, it did not, because what it was... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 1264 pages
...part of the injured person's employment to hazard, to suffer, or to do that which caused his injury? If yea, the accident arose out of his employment. If nay, it did not, beoause what it was not part of the employment to hazard, to suffer, or to do cannot well be the cause... | |
 | Law - 1917 - 1318 pages
...arises upon the very words of the statute, and it is generally of some real assistance. Jt is this: Was it part of the injured person's employment to...to suffer, or to do that which caused his injury? If yea, the accident arose out his employment. If nay, it did not, because what it was not part of... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 994 pages
...incidental to it." In the case of the Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway v. Highley,3 Lord Stunner (at p. 372) deals with the matter : " Was it part of the injured...to suffer, or to do that which caused his injury? If yea, the accident arose out of his employment. If nay, it did not, because what it was not part... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1919 - 434 pages
...following test, put by Lord Sumner in Lancashire <£ York»hire Ry. v. llighley. [1917] AC 352 at p. 372 : "Was it part of the injured person's employment to...hazard, to suffer or to do that which caused his injury? If yea, the accident arose out of his employment. If nay, it did not, because what it was not part... | |
 | Electronic journals - 1921 - 352 pages
...Sumner, quoted with approval by the Lord Chancellor, observed in an earlier case, is whether it was part of the injured person's employment to hazard, to suffer or to do that which caused his injury. " If yea, the accident arose out of his employment. If nay, it did not, because what it was not part... | |
 | Alured Nathaniel Myddelton Wilshere, John Indermaur, Alured Myddelton Wilshere - History - 1922 - 742 pages
...essential is that the accident should arise "out of the employment"; the first test here is this : "Was it part of the injured person's employment to...to suffer, or to do that which caused his injury?" (Lancashire and Yorkshire Railway Co. v. Highley [1917] AC, at p. 372; 86 LJKB 715; 116 LT 767; 33... | |
 | John Mews - Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 282 pages
...Workman—Accident not Arising Out of Employment.]—In the case of an injury to a workman, if it was part of the injured person's employment to hazard, to suffer, or to do that which caused the injury, the accident arose out of his employment; but it does i:ot arise out of the employment... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1922 - 1356 pages
...generally of some real assist" auce. It is this : Was it part of the injured person's employ" nifnt to hazard, to suffer, or to do that which caused his " injury ? If yea, the accident arose out of his employment ; " if nay, it did not, because what it was not... | |
| |
