Reports of Cases Ruled and Determined at Nisi Prius: In the Court of Common Pleas, and on the Northern Circuit; from the Sittings After Trinity Term, 55 Geo. III. 1815, to the Sittings After Michaelmas Term, 58 Geo. III. 1817, Both Inclusive. To which are Added, Copious Notes Upon the Most Important Subjects of Commercial and General Law, Volume 1 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 99
Page 3
... proved by one of the plaintiff's witnesses . It is strictly equitable ; for where a copyholder is admitted to several ... prove , either that a particular custom did exist to warrant the charges ; or that there was no custom on the sub ...
... proved by one of the plaintiff's witnesses . It is strictly equitable ; for where a copyholder is admitted to several ... prove , either that a particular custom did exist to warrant the charges ; or that there was no custom on the sub ...
Page 4
... proved a cus- tom to controul the plaintiff's charges ; therefore the plaintiff may resort to a quantum meruit . At- tree ... prove a custom , he may , not- withstanding , resort to a quantum meruit . Whether the plaintiff be entitled to ...
... proved a cus- tom to controul the plaintiff's charges ; therefore the plaintiff may resort to a quantum meruit . At- tree ... prove a custom , he may , not- withstanding , resort to a quantum meruit . Whether the plaintiff be entitled to ...
Page 97
... prove that the plain- tiffs acquiesced ; and evidence may be admitted to shew that they were guilty of gross negligence in not examining and rejecting the bacon in time . But the evidence of custom cannot be received to alter the ...
... prove that the plain- tiffs acquiesced ; and evidence may be admitted to shew that they were guilty of gross negligence in not examining and rejecting the bacon in time . But the evidence of custom cannot be received to alter the ...
Page 117
... question was , whether the ship had been seized for this cause only . The defend- ant ought to have been called upon to prove that , in fact , 1815 . FAITH and Others 0 . PEARSON . 1815 MICHAELMAS TERM , 56 GEORGE III . 117.
... question was , whether the ship had been seized for this cause only . The defend- ant ought to have been called upon to prove that , in fact , 1815 . FAITH and Others 0 . PEARSON . 1815 MICHAELMAS TERM , 56 GEORGE III . 117.
Page 139
... prove a con- the defendant as their agent , to purchase 129 an action bales of tobacco of the best quality , for a ... prove that a contract was made ; but it is a dif- certain bales the broker , who made the contract for him , cannot be ...
... prove a con- the defendant as their agent , to purchase 129 an action bales of tobacco of the best quality , for a ... prove that a contract was made ; but it is a dif- certain bales the broker , who made the contract for him , cannot be ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
act of bankruptcy action agent agreement assignees ASSUMPSIT attorney bankrupt bankrupt laws barratry Best bill of exchange bill of lading broker brought Cagliari Campb cargo charge circumstances claim commission common law consignee contended contrà contract counsel Court court of equity covenant creditor damages debt deed defendant defendant's delivered delivery East entitled equity evidence fendant fraud fraudulent freight GIBBS held horse indorsed James Hardman John Hardman Jury Lens liable libel license likewise London Lord Lord Ellenborough Lord Mansfield loss ment neral notice objection officer opinion owner paid party patent payment person plaintiff plea port possession premium principal promise prove question received recover rent Richard Pilkington ruptcy Scarlett scrivener serjeant sheriff shew ship sion Solicitor statute statute of frauds sufficient surety tain Taunt tenant tiff tion trade transitu underwriters usury Vaughan Verdict vessel voyage warrant witness