VII, pp. 64-89. J. Zahlfleisch. Variae Lectiones zur Physik E-Z des Aristoteles bei Simplikios.

VIII, pp. 90-135. L. Gurlitt. zu Ciceros Briefen ad Atticum. enumerated on p. 135.

Exegetisches und Kritisches
Discussion of 23 passages

IX, pp. 136-147. J. Dietze. Zum Märchen von Amor und Psyche. The tale, originally localized in Miletus, was later at the end of the first century B. C. combined with allegory and assumed the style of the love-story of the Hellenistic erotic type. Apuleius is responsible for certain Roman allusions.

Miscellen.-I. pp. 148-151. Fr. Susemihl. Die Aspasia des Antisthenes. Antisthenes seems to have held up the relation of Pericles and Aspasia as a warning against the evil consequences of a too ardent and dominating passion.

2. pp. 151-153. T. Büttner-Wobst. Polybios als Astronom. Although his method (IX 15) would lead to great error, we cannot say that he had "only a superficial knowledge of the subject." His knowledge, such as it was, was the best to be had at that time.

3. pp. 153-154. M. Petschenig. Zu Maximian und Ammian. Three conjectures.

4. Pp. 154-155.

112, 126, 130, 137.

K. Ohlert. Petroniana. Notes on Nos. IOI,

5. pp. 155-158. A. Frederking. Zu Ciceros Briefen. critical notes.

II

6. pp. 158-160. W. Heraeus. Zur Kritik und Erklärung von Porfyrios Horazscholien. Cont'd pp. 317, 477, 630.

7. p. 160. H. Weber. Aristoteles 'Anvaiwv Toλireia VII 4 suggests that ἵππος ἐκ μαρμάρου τυκτή, ὡς would heal the text.

X, pp. 161-185. L. Radermacher. Analecta. (1) The first verse of the couplet cited by Suidas v. evenμía from Aelian is assigned to Ariston the Stoic. (2) On a rhetorical fr. in Cramer IV, Anecdota Oxon. p. 153- a product of the Byz. period consisting of corrupted excerpts and based on Ps. Dionys. p. 24, 15 ff. Us. (3) On the book of Henoch. (4) Achil. Tatius and Dio Chrys. (5) Dion. of H. in de Demosth. cites Dem. from an abbreviated text. The testimony of his readings is to be taken as against S. (Parisinus). In de Thuc. his method of citation is different. Perhaps he quoted brief passages from memory, (6) Dio Cass. XXXVI, 20, 1.

XI, pp. 186-200. K. Lincke. Miscellanea. In Aesch. Prom. 801 reads poíμov. Notes on Herod. I 138, VII 104; Thuc. III

38, 5; IV 23, 2; VII 39, 2; Xen. Anab. I 7, 10-12; Hellen. V 38; Mem. I 1, 2; 6; Plato Phaedr. 251 C; Phaed. 59 A; Crito 53 E; Aristot. poet. c. 11 p. 1452 a 24; Cic. Rosc. 34, 96. Caes. b. G. I 16; 47; IV 33. Sen. de const. sap. 12. 1 and 3. Marc. 4. 10; I 23-27, Origen contra Cels. IV 83; VI 51.

Evang.

XII, pp. 201-205. O. Hoffmann. Zwei neue arkadische Inschriften. No. 21 and 22 of the new Attic imprecatory tablets in the Nat'l Mus. at Athens publ. by Ziebart in Nachr. d. Gött. Gesell. d. Wiss. 1899, p. 105 ff.

XIII, pp. 206-237. M. Groeger. Die Kirke-Dichtung in der Odyssee. Conclusions summarized on p. 237 that in form and content it is later than 2, d, e, ɩ, and the beginning of ; perhaps also later than the epivakin scene of μ. On the other hand the prooemium, 246-255, and the greatest part of μ should be later, as they presuppose a previous divine admonition. The condensed survey 300 ff. is also later, but that does not mean by another writer.

XIV, pp. 238-255. P. Egenolff. Zu Lentz' Herodian. In the καθολικὴ προσῳδία Lentz relied on the MS basis laid by his predecessors, and that was inadequate. Some results of a collation of the Dindorf text with the Vienna MS are given. II. Supplementary notes on things omitted by Lentz, etc.

XV, pp. 256-271. Eb. Nestle. Zur neuen Philo-Ausgabe. Criticism of the method, and notes on the biblical quotations.

XVI, pp. 272–304. W. Sternkopf. Ueber die "Verbesserung" des Clodianischen Gesetzentwurfes de exilio Ciceronis. The correctio consisted in setting the same penalty as Cicero's on any one receiving him inside the limits set. The 500 miles was reckoned from the Italian frontier, not from Rome. The text of ad Att. III 4 should be changed to quingenta to agree with Dio Cass. XXXVIII 17, 7 and Plut. Cic. 32 (p. 304) Clodius' lex provocationis was passed March 20, 58 B. C. About March 25, the tribune promulgated the rogatio de exilio Ciceronis. About April 3, he introduced the proposition in changed form, which was accepted about April 24 (Cf. L. Gurlitt, p. 478 infra.).

XVII, pp. 305-311. J. Ziehen. Archäologisch-Textkritische Bemerkungen zur Salmasianusanthologie. Continuation of an article in the Festschrift für Otto Benndorf S. 49 ff. A contribution towards a much-needed annotated edition of the Salmasian Anthology. 11 Notes.

Miscellen.-8. p. 312. Eb. Nestle. Ein moabitischer Stadtname in den griechischen Wörterbüchern. Kepás in Passow, Pape and others should be Keipádas or better Keip-'Adas (van 7p). Cf. Kapynda Carthago, "New City."

9. pp. 313-315. H. Jurenka. Der Mythus in Pindars erster olympischer Ode und Bakchylides III. While the court-poets would not refer to the death of their patron, and so could not say that after death he would attain to the honors of a hero, still he and the public would surely understand this from the myth.

10. pp. 315-316. O. Cr. Com. adesp. 410 p. 485 Kock. Not a comic fragment at all.

δοκούντων.

11. pp. 316-317. G. Helmreich. Zu Galen Пepì Tv avr BOKOVVTOV. Frag. from cod. Paris. 634 suppl. gr. containing some Byz. scholia quoting the work.

12. pp. 317-320. W. Heraeus. Zur Kritik und Erklärung von Porfyrios Horazscholien; II. Zu den Episteln; III. Zu den Satiren.

P. 320 Fr. Studniczka. Petron. 126, Suppl. to p. 155. The conjecture Dionam (-em) can be found in Bücheler's ed. maj.

XVIII, pp. 321-328. K. Wernicke. Apollon Stroganoff und Apollon vom Belvedere. W. agrees with G. Kieseritzky (Athen. Mitth. XXIV (1899) S. 468 ff.) that the Stroganoff Apollo is of ancient origin; but he holds that as the left arm is an addition from some statue of Mercury it does not help us in the interpretation of the Ap. Belvedere. The latter is to be thought of as in the moment of triumph, having just hit some opponent with an

arrow.

XIX, pp. 329–343. A. Müller. Noch einmal die Sehverhältnisse im Dionysostheater. Continuation of the subject from Philol. Suppl. Bd. VII pp. 108-112 that the later high stage described by Vitruvius was introduced so as to enable some of the spectators more easily to see the actors. To this Doerpfeld (Athen. Mitth. 1899, S. 310 ff. had protested that the assumed difficulty to which certain spectators were liable, did not actually occur. Müller still maintains (p. 342-3) that for many spectators in the third story a high stage would give a better view without seriously encroaching on the occupants of the proedriae.

XX, pp. 344-361. R. Holland. Mythographische Beiträge. 1. Der Typhoeuskampf. H. compares Antonin. Lib. 28 and Nonnus I-II as illustrating Robert's assumption of a poem as the basis of Apollod. I 39 ff. Typhoeus may be regarded as the winter-giant, the going of the gods to the south as the migration of the birds. Other metamorphoses of the gods are given. 2. Hermochares and Ktesylla. The tale (Antonin. Lib. I after Nicand. III) has been put in the background by the similar romance of Akontios and Kydippe, by Kallimachos. The throwing of the apple is necessary to the plot and not borrowed from the latter. 3. The burial of Alkmene. In Anton. Lib. 33 by putting in parenthesis Kov-'Hpakλns and ending the sentence with <ayoutes> topographical difficulties are removed.

XXI, pp. 362-399. H. Steiger. Warum schrieb Euripides seine Troerinnen? Summary on p. 398-399. Eurip. intended to warn his countrymen against undertaking a war against Syracuse for conquest, by showing up the war against Ilion, stripped of all poetic ornament.

XXII, pp. 400-405. R. Foerster. Eine Fälschung in Libanios. The entire close of the speech repì dovdeías is, in the Paris ed. of Morel (1627, Tom. II, p. 659, 19 f.) a forgery. Perhaps the original ending had been lost on the way to the printer's; the beginning he restored by means of his own Latin translation. As this was badly written, and as he took too little time and also knew too little Greek, the attempt was very imperfect. The last part for some reason he failed to complete.

XXIII, pp. 406-415. Fr. Reuss. Zu Valerius Flaccus, Argon. V-VIII. Emendations.

XXIV, pp. 416-440. W. Heraeus. Neue Beiträge zur Kritik des Valerius Maximus und Nepotianus.

XXV, pp. 441-465. M. Rothstein. Nachträgliches zu Properz. A spirited reply to Fr. Leo's review of R.'s Propertius (Gött. G. Anz. 1898, 722-750) which criticized his method of treating the Greek originals.

Miscellen.-13. pp. 466-469. H. Lucas. Die Neunzahl bei Horaz und Verwandtes. Nono mense Sat. I 6, 61 is to be understood as a round-number, a popular expression for 'some months'.

14. pp. 469-471. Fr. Susemihl. Noch einmal die Aspasia des Antisthenes. Continued from p. 148. Though the chief support of his argument falls, as Athen. XIII 589 e is not to be assigned to Antisthenes, still S. does not give up his former view.

15. pp. 471-473. R. Ellis. Ad Ciceronis Epistulas, quae in Tyrrello-Purserianae ed. vol. VI continentur.

16. pp. 474-476. F. Münzer. Eine Pliniusvita von 1496. This life published in the Brescia and Venice edd. of the N. H. in 1496 is really of modern origin, based on Pliny and other writers and a Veronese inscription which has nothing to do with Pliny.

17. pp. 476-477. Eb. Nestle. Zu den griechischen Namen der Buchstaben. A book of 1538 shows that even then the theory that the names of the Greek alphabet came from the Aramaic, as they end in a, had been advocated.

18. pp. 477-480. W. Heraeus. Zur Kritik und Erklärung von Porfyrios Horazscholien.

XXVI, pp. 481-504. F. Skutsch. Zur lateinischen Wortgeschichte und plautinischen Versmessung. Among other things

concludes that em is from eme (emo) p. 498 ff. The ius of the pron. gen. can be one syllable. II. For iurgium in Persa. 797 read iurigium; for audax in Amph. 985 read avidax; for olfactare in Men. 167 read olefactare

XXVII, pp. 505-520. J. Jessen. Zu Juvenal. Critical and exegetical notes.

XXVIII, pp. 521-531. L. Cohn. Zur neuen Philo-Ausgabe. Reply to Nestle (p. 256 ff.). Pp. 532-536 Paul Wendland replies to Nestle's criticism of his share of the joint work.

XXIX, pp. 537-544. Fr. Susemihl. Die Zeit des Historikers Kratippos. He lived between Polemon and Zopyros on the one hand and Dionysios on the other, and is not the peripatetic of Cicero's time.

XXIX, (sic) pp. 545-559. H. Weber. Zu der Schrift Tep διαίτης ὀξέων (MSS. MV.-A).

XXX, pp. 560-573. T. Büttner-Wobst. Studien zu Polybios. (1) Arrangement of some excerpts of Book 21.

XXXI, pp. 574-577. G. Lehnert. Eine rhetorische Quelle für Boetius' Commentare zu Aristoteles Teрì épμnveías. The choice of Ter. Cic. and Verg. and the use to enliven the commentary of citations from these school favorites point to some one original grammatical work, showing peripatetic influence.

XXXII, pp. 578-583. L. Gurlitt. Lex Clodia de exilio Ciceronis. Continues Sternkopf's discussion (Philol. LIX (1900) 272 ff.). G. compares Buning's conclusions (Prg. Cösfeld 1894). G. believes the correctio (1) meant a lightening of Cicero's punishment. (2) In the first form Cic. was banished from the whole Rom. empire. This was afterwards changed to 400 miles. from Italy. As the Rom. wrote D for 500, Sternkopf's emendation CCCC to CCCCC in ad Att. III 4 is wrong.

XXXIII, pp. 584-591. H. Blümner. Neue Fragmente des Edictum Diocletiani. Discussion of the fragments found on the site of ancient Aigeira in Achaia and publ. by Stais in 'Еøŋμ. ἀρχαιολ. 1899, 147 f.

XXXIV, pp. 592-597. L. Radermacher. Griechischer Sprachgebrauch. soudév in Aristoph. Frogs 738 ff. and Ps.-Aristeas $211, p. 58 Wendl. is compared with German 'das ist mir wie Nichts', and is a popular idiom. Notes on aů; táλiv; tís idwv = a man; ovdèv ovdeví (Isaeus XIII 8), also a colloquial idiom and hence rare in literature; πάναλκις for πανάλκης Sophronius Mir. Cyr. et Joannis I 3425 C/D.

XXXV, pp. 598-604. R. Helm. De Prooemio Apuleianae, quae est de deo Socratis orationis. H. thinks that Apuleius being