the connoisseur as excelling in this art which In a finds, and his colour, if not so finished in its as to be That there is something of effort, even of strain, in much of his work is inevitable from the enormous pains bestowed upon it and the which it has been executed, but these are high pressure (mental and intellectual) at defects of noble qualities so rare almost unique. "The greatest effect with the least trouble" is the motto of most painters of to-day; and indifference to beauty and refinement, both of subject and sentiment, is so much in vogue that Mr. Alfred Hunt is somewhat of an anachronism. Only a few names can be mentioned, and those mostly among water-colourists, whose aims in art are at all parallel to Mr. Alfred Hunt's. How many are there besides Mr. North who could paint with such minuteness, and yet with so much breadth and atmosphere, the tender masses of verdant undergrowth which we see in Mr. Trist's "When Summer Days are Fine" (18)? how many besides Mr. Albert Goodwin have the patience and the skill to work out for us the infinite gradations of light and colour on culty of such work is alone enough to make it 'Whitby Cliff at Sunset" (136)? The diffirare; and its rarity is of a kind which deserves to be held in high esteem, for it requires for its production no mere manual dexterity or trained eyesight, but a mind as sensitive and finely strung as that of a lyric poet. 66 covery of an acte de naissance at Haarlem, of de son admiration profonde pour celui qui Tavait devancé et dont il était à même, autant personne, d'apprécier les conquêtes. Il rait dire a ceux qui savaient lire dans une ne noble, 'Anch' io sono pittore !'" But it will not be imagined, because I praise se things, that Mrs. Pattison in an exEaustive and well-studied volume can confine herself to an ingenious generalisation or a magnanimous surmise. THE WORKS OF ALFRED HUNT. The collection is very interesting, as it shows days to the present time. We find from the us the development of the artist from his Oxford first that his imagination was attracted by the stern grandeur of barren mountains, as well as by the splendour of the sunset and the fairylike beauty of stream and dell. The same severe spirit which is seen in the "Styehead Pass" of 1853 animated a fine drawing of the Cuchullin Hills in Skye sent to the Water-Colour Society a year or two ago. The "Styehead Pass" is gray almost to monotony in colour, but its sweep of the solitary pass with great power. design is magnificent, presenting the grand On the other hand, we find in Mr. Budgett's "When the Leaves begin to turn" (101), painted four years later, a study of ferns and stones pre-Raphaelite in minuteness of execution and in unswerving accuracy of form and colour; this and an exquisite "Harlech" (400) of the same date, belonging to Mr. W. Newall, jun., are the prototypes of such later masterpieces as the "Mountain joyous with Leaves and Sheaves (129) of 1873, lent by Mr. Humphrey Roberts, and Mr. Trist's "Loch Maree" (118) of 1871. Such works as the two last-named and the Whitbys (133 and 136), Mr. Kenrick's "Leafy June" (124), and the lovely watercolour "Ullswater (27), belonging to Mr. R. S. Newall, give Mr. Hunt his greatest claim to distinction among landscape artists past and present. They are all scenes in which aimspiritualised by the light of the sun. the aspect of the earth is transfigured and artists have seen and painted the same, or similar, effects, but none has seen or painted them quite in the same way. Mr. Hunt seems throughout to have been urged by a double care-to be faithful at once to the sight of his eyes and the image of his mind. No painter listens more impartially to the rival claims of reality and Colours is one of those few artists whose idea. Other COSMO MONKHOUSE. MR. DUNTHORNE'S GALLERY. North, an eminent living member of the old Water-Colour Society, is represented by some agreeable and truly artistic drawings; but more memorable, of course, is the one exhibited work of Frederick Walker, and less frequently visible are the drawings of Pinwell. Frederick Walker's single piece is that famous example of his art, "The Harbour of Refuge.' That is, it is the finished water-colour. The subject was variously treated by the artist, but in the drawing at Mr. Dunthorne's his delightful fancy reached its most finished expression. By G. Pinwell, an artist who, it will be remembered, was cut off young, like Walker, there are two drawings as to which it has been said already, in another place, that, along with "The Elixir of Love," which is not present, they would have constituted a sufficient representation of Pinwell's art. It may well be that "The Elixir of Love was a more entertaining, but it could hardly have been a more exquisite, drawing than those which are now exhibited. They select as their subjects the two companion incidents in Mr. Browning's "Pied Piper of Hamelin "- -a poem which may be described as the infant's easy introduction to the most subtle of poets. The two scenes depicted by Pinwell are scenes of departure. In the one, it is the rats which gather nimbly at the Pied Piper's feet and prepare to follow the weird wanderer who has them under his charm. In the other, it is the children who, because the people of Hamelin have not kept their promise to the Piper in the matter of recompense, must now needs follow the music and the persistently trudging footsteps as they make for the remote hills. We do not admire everything in Pinwell's technique. It is surely true that his use of body colour was excessive; but his draughtsmanship was at all events significant and dainty, and when he died, only a young man, the sources of his invention were not dried up; on the contrary, he was flowing and fertile. He had a genuine insight into various character, and an appreciation of much in form that was either expressive or lovely. CORRESPONDENCE. AYSGARTH DEFENCE ASSOCIATION. 1 Oppidans Road, N. W.: Feb. 2, 1884. An association is being formed for the defence of Aysgarth from the dangers with which it is threatened, of which the ACADEMY gave a brief account a fortnight ago. The president is Lord Wharncliffe; the hon. secretary Mr. J. H Metcalfe, Leyburn, Wensleydale. Among those who have already joined it are Mr. Ruskin, Messrs. Alma Tadema, E. J. Poynter, Alfred Hunt; Profs. Henry Morley, Gardiner, W. G. Adams, De la Motte, Warr; Messrs. Richard Garnett, Walter Besant, Gosse, Cornelius Walford, C. E. Maurice, &c. All others who sympathise with this defence are invited to send their names either to Mr. Metcalfe or to me. Copies of petitions to the Houses of Parliament may be had on application to Mr. Metcalfe, to whom also subscriptions may be sent. We feel sure that the beauty of Aysgarth cannot lack JOHN W. HALES. the shi able, if not quite good-tempered, review of deciphering Leonardo's MSS. may be counted "This is to be a collection without order, taken int from many papers, which I have copied here, hoping to arrange them later, each in its place, according to the subjects of which they may treat," &c. ISS. of wit labor ha will to I be e By quoting a quaint passage from Leonardo, which had to be translated in all its literal obsoleteness, as my own "General Introduction In my publication I have adopted an arrange to the Book of Painting" (Prolegomena), he at ment of the subjects in their logical sequence.rar once creates the impression in the mind of the In the opinion of my critic, however, the superficial reader that my work is indigest-treatise on painting, as arranged by me, is ible, and, by further putting his Italian "confused by extraneous matter, useless to the dictionary under contribution, he is enabled painter, and puzzling to the general reader." to find the desired mote in another's eye. Otri, As I myself point out (vol. i., p. 242) that the hel he says, according to Baretti's Dictionary, texts which treat of the painter's materials had should be translated as 66 bladders," not "air- been added to the Libro della Pittura to serve sacks." If he will refer to the higher authority as a supplement and an appendix, there is of the Vocabolario della Crusca, or Farfani, he will neither ingenuity nor common fairness on find that I am right. But what would my critic the part of my critic in reproaching me for have said if I had actually gone further, and having made one of the chapters "to consist translated it "the inflated goat-skin," which simply of a list of twenty colours and chemical otro really is, and for which "air-sack" is at ingredients. A painter would see that this least as correct a rendering as "bladder"? was probably merely a note of articles to be What, however, can an impartial reader think ordered from a colour shop." of a critic who avails himself of a possibly doubtful translation of one word to condemn the whole work in which it occurs by coolly asserting "After this specimen, the reader will not require an elaborate examination of the treatise. We As regards my transcripts of Leonardo's MSS., it stands to reason that my critic must wish to depreciate their accuracy, while availing himself of the assistance they afford "in the direction of a knowledge of the contents of the various note-books," as long as he cannot carry out his gigantic plan of producing photographs after the original MSS. in England, numbering about two thousand pages. Not a few of the 1,566 texts published in my work may already be verified by reference to the photographs reproducing some 160 sheets of original MS. at Paris in the two portly volumes edited at the expense of the French Government by M. Ravaisson. The Literary Works appeared, it will be remembered, some months before the French savant brought out his second volume. He gives in it, as an Appendix, several lists of errata, filling nine closely printed folio pages, mostly printer's errors or slips of the pen, of not much consequence even in scientific publications; they are THE PROPOSED REPRODUCTION OF THE MSS. OF perhaps unavoidable. But among his corrections defenders. LEONARDO. London: Jan. 28, 1884. It has of late repeatedly been suggested that Leonardo da Vinci's MSS. in England should be reproduced in facsimile by photography. The promoter of this scheme, which is advocated in several issues of the Times, may not unnaturally have considered it desirable to depreciate my recent publication of The Literary Works of Leonardo da Vinci in order to pave the way for his own. Accordingly, as his lengthy and of serious blunders there are not a few-I may In reply to the further reproach of having made an injudicious_selection of texts, I may simply reply that I have made no selection at all, but that I have conscientiously reproto painting, sculpture, architecture, geography, duced from the autographs everything relating philosophy, &c., duly leaving it to the reader, whether a specialist or no, to skip the chapters in which he may feel no particular interest. An artist's advice in a publication of Leonardo's writings on the fine arts is, perhaps, indispensable; and my readers have no doubt noticed in my Preface that in the preparation of the work I had the advantage of the inde fatigable assistance of a highly distinguished R.A.-a circumstance which somewhat consoles me for not having sought the advice of a specialist in a limited field. I am truly glad that I have not "shocked the artistic sentiment" of my critic by "advancing the charge against Leonardo that he turned Mussulman " (though I am far from denying it) during his stay in Egypt and Syria, not, b it remembered, as a painter, but as an engineer I certainly "maintain that Leonardo took ser vice under the Sultan of Egypt" in that capa city, in which he was succeeded by a Germa 66 66 The matter was well threshed out in Frenc journals," but with a result exactly the co trary of that implied by my critic, as may shown by a quotation from the Gazette des Beau Arts, which certainly does not justify my criti denunciation of me as 39 a writer who, search of discoveries, may arrive at the wild conclusions." M. Ravaisson has thus summ up his discussion of the subject (Gazette Beaux-Arts, 1881, p. 522) :"Pour conclure, tout bien pesé et considéré, textes autographes de Léonard de Vinci prod par M. Richter, comparés à l'ensemble des au textes du grand Italien dont l'authenticité est taine, paraissent prouver, comme il le dit, Léonard aurait réellement visité l'Orient' dant sa jeunesse." Prof. Thaussing, Ribbach, and others since, in their writings on Leonardo, acce as facts what are here styled "the wildest conclusions." In making the above remarks in pure selfdefence against what will now, probably, be thought to have been a scarcely justifiable attack on my book, I do not in the least intend to depreciate the importance of an undertaking which, if successful, would be most welcome to me, because it would furnish a complete answer to the criticism itself, by being a test of the transcripts published in The Literary Works. I can assure my critic of my best wishes for the filfilment of the expectations he appears to pisce in some "systematic search for Leonardo's many volumes of notes still undiscovered." I may, however, tell him that there is no reason to suppose that Leonardo's MSS. had been used to light kitchen fires." I had made it a point to ransack the public and private libraries of this and other countries in search of MSS. of Leonardo, and I must reanain satisfied with the results which many years of such labour have yielded. In any instance, if they have escaped the fate of the Alexandrian Library, through the instrumentality of old ladies or others, I hope that their present owners will now come forward to comunicate them to my critic, so that my feeble rushlight may be extinguished in the blaze of the full light which such results, arrived at in so "scientific" a manner, may throw on Leonardo da Vinci. JEAN PAUL RICHTER. I THE TEUTONIC KINSHIP OF THRACIANS AND Oxford: Feb. 3, 1884. character. I might have added that the names "Comparative philology," to quote Mr. ARTHUR J. EVANS. NOTES ON ART AND ARCHAEOLOGY. February 22, the first of a course of six lectures to ladies, at the British Museum, on "Egyptian Art," illustrated with diagrams, and afterwards by a visit to the Egyptian galleries. The object of the course is to give an outline of Egyptiar: art as introductory to the art of the classical nation. The fee for the course is one guinea. Further information may be obtained from Miss Jenner, 63 Brook Street, or from Mr. R. S. Poole. MR. JOHN BATTY has presented casts of two Anglo-Saxon carved stones in Rothwell parish church, Yorkshire, to the Leeds Philosophical Museum. These stones were minutely described some time ago in the Journal of the Yorkshire Archaeological and Topographical Association (part xxvii.), and were the object of a very interesting letter by Prof. Stephens, of Copenhagen, copied into the Antiquary early in 1882. M. LOUIS LELOIR has lately died in Paris. He was but a middle-aged man, for he had two brothers, both of them devoted to the art scarcely reached fifty. The more prominent of of water-colour, Louis Leloir was almost at the head of the modern French school of watercolour painting. He was a nimble and spirited draughtsman, an audacious colourist, and, to boot, a keen and sympathetic observer of a was never a characteristic of his labours. His wholly mundane existence. Artistic reticence art was very skilful and not a little cheeky. THE STAGE. of THE election of Mr. Colin Hunter to the honours of the Associateship was one of the surprises which, as it would seem, the Royal Academy occasionally prepares for the unimaginative mind. The evening when Mr. Woods was chosen was perhaps the last occasion until MISS ANDERSON'S NEW PART. now when the art public had opportunity for Although nothing that I can write is likely astonishment, though it is true that Mr. Brock's WE think Miss Anderson shows more real to shake Mr. Karl Blind's belief in "Geto- election did not occur at a very appropriate power in "Comedy and Tragedy" than she did Germanic" Thracians and Trojans, I may be moment. Perhaps it may now be held, how-in Mr. Gilbert's mythological piece. The general pardoned a few concluding observations. The ever, that Mr. Woods and Mr. Brock have jus- current of criticism, however, seems to be names "Aspurgion" and "Teutoburgion," on tified the favour of their brethren, and we can setting rather against her, as, on the whole, which Mr. Blind lays so much stress, simply do hope that Mr. Colin Hunter will do the same. her new performance is spoken of with less ot exist anywhere within the old Thracian Still, his election will appear to many to be at approval than was given to her earlier appeararea. The 'Agroupyiavol of Strabo (from whom, the least premature. We do not express this ances. But there is nothing very surprising in suppose, Mr. Blind extracts his form "Aspur- opinion in the interests of any single candidate. this. It is, we think, only the natural reaction zan") inhabited part of the old Sarmatian land The interests of any single candidate are ill- from a temper of eulogy too unmixed. There to the east of the Palus Maeotis, and were served by an attempt to force his election, for was at first a chivalrous disposition to see burdered, therefore, by a race to be carefully dis- the Academicians act, no doubt, with a sense of nothing but good in the most prominent actress tinguished from either Thracians or Getae. That their responsibility, and cannot but resent the who for many years has come to us from across Eray Germanic tribe should have reached the dictation of the too enthusiastic publicists who the Atlantic, and there is a measure of disapouth of the Tanais by Strabo's time is not in- have, if the word may be allowed, their pet pointment in the discovery that the possessor conceivable when we consider the high antiquity protégés. At the same time, the course of events talent and undeniable charm is not the possessor the trade routes between the Euxine and the at the last election is undoubtedly surprising, of the fullest genius. In "Comedy and Tragedy" Baltic: witness the late remarkable gold find and the clever and highly promising young Miss Anderson at least shows that she adds to in East Prussia of Greco-Scythian ornaments Scotchman on whom the choice has fallen may the possession of charm much experience and ating from the sixth century B.C. In any deem that it is by a fortunate accident of serviceable tact. The story of the piece has ase, however, the High-German form of the election that he is numbered already among a been told at length in the daily papers. It is Lame "Aspurgiani" would be fatal to their body from which painters of the figure like briefly that of an honest and home-loving thic origin. Nor is Mr. Blind a whit happier Mr. Albert Moore and Mr. J. D. Linton, actress-a person of blameless conduct, a proth his second example. The name "Teuto-painters of landscape like Mr. Alfred Hunt, ficient in her art-who, being pursued by the gion" first appears in Ptolemy as applied addresses of the Regent of France, plans to a Pannonian town on the Middle Danube, receive him on one occasion in order that he in a region which, so far as we can learn from may fall into the hands of her husband. The cient sources, was never Thracian in any Regent and his friends arrive to supper; he is ase, and where, by the second century of our Germanic colonists may well have fixed in Water-Colours were opened on Monday by a THE Schools of the Royal Institute of Painters detained alone with Clarice, and the husband, by arrangement, breaks in upon them to chalshort address from Mr. J. D. Linton, the Vice- lenge effectually one whom hitherto he had President of the Institute. The teaching is challenged in vain. While the Regent and the husband of Clarice are fighting in the garden, rightly gratuitous; but, with equal justice, a pretty high standard of proficiency is exacted Clarice entertains the guests-who know nothing from those who seek to profit by it. There are of it-with one of those "improvisations" for at present between twenty and thirty students. which she is supposed to be celebrated; and For the present there is no room for ladies; "comedy" is succeeded by "tragedy" when, Both Cech and but this is, perhaps, not so very much to be passing from the scene that has engaged her, regretted, as at the Slade and at Kensington Clarice breaks into anguish at hearing what they are, to say the least, cordially encouraged. she thinks the cry of her husband. The guests scene; but it is in truth The new schools of the Institute are held in take it to be still a Great Ormond Street, in the studies occupied reality-a reality, however, not so unfortunate in the evening by classes of the Working Men's as she had imagined, for her husband rushes in College. Mr. Linton and Mr. Alfred Parsons to her, and it is the Regent who is mortally have been the first Visitors. Each Visitor visits wounded. In the brief time which the piece on alternate days for a fortnight. takes to play, the actress is required to pass through a world of varied emotion. And Miss MISS HELEN BELOE will deliver on Friday, Anderson's own variety is often very consider 1-mselves. " When, again, Mr. Blind professes acquaint- a whole class of well-ascertained Thracian Words, and those wholly un-Germanic in their Mr. John Syer, and Mr. Keeley Halswelle, 66 able, as-to take a small instance-in her reception of the many guests, for each of whom she has not only a new word, but a new manner, of cordiality and welcome. At the close she becomes exciting the situation, we admit, is intense; but, then, she does not show herself unequal to it. Mdme. Sarah Bernhardt or Mrs. Kendal might do still more with it, but what is done by Miss Anderson is enough to strike and interest. In the whole play Clarice is really the only dramatis persona of importance; but the airs of Mr. Alexander as the husband are those of a man brave and in earnest, and Mr. J. H. Barnes makes an effectively egotistical and libertine, if not exactly a seductive, Regent. And Mr. E. F. Edgar gives great gravity and meaning to the few words he has to speak as the old Doctor, who is sorry to think ill of Clarice, but to whom the supper-party is, for the moment, damning evidence. We make two criticisms of detail. One of them has been made before, and it applies to the author. Why did not Mr. Gilbert, who has taken the pains to make his dialogue brilliant and characteristic, take the pains also to violate the truths of history less obviously than by causing the Regent of France to die years before he really died? The other is a question of attitude; we are not quite sure about it, but we fancy that the tenue of the period was somewhat too stately to make it likely that a staircase was used so continually as a seat. Miss Anderson, early in the play, takes up her posi MUSIC. RECENT CONCERTS. AT the last Monday Popular Concert, Miss the tranquillity necessary to obtain contrast. The finale is brilliant, but the least valuable Richard Wagner is not forgotten by his Mr. Leo Frank Schuster commemorated the criticise the performance, but merely to record MACMILLAN & CO.'S LIST. TENNYSON'S WORKS. tion there as if in an accustomed place; and part, admirably played by Miss Zimmermann, THE WORKS OF LORD TENNYSON, later, when Clarice is engaged in improvising, several of the guests dispose themselves likewise on the ample steps. The ease of the thing is very modern. It certainly did not belong to the last generation. Did it belong to the early years of the eighteenth century? STAGE NOTE. POET LAUREATE. A New Collected A NEW NOVEL BY GEORGE FLEMING. Author of "A Nile Novel," "Mirage," "The Head of is very difficult; the style of writing for the instrument is at times very much after the manner of Chopin. At the close there was considerable applause, and Mr. Stanford came forward and bowed acknowledgment from the platform. Another interesting feature of the VESTIGIA: a Novel. By George Fleming, evening was the appearance of the new American tenor, Mr. Winch. His voice is agreeable in quality, and his style excellent. songs by Handel and Purcell, and obtained Regi-well-deserved success with two songs by Raff and RALPH WALDO EMERSON, Jensen, both well accompanied by Sig. Romili. The programme included Mendelssohn's Quartett in D major and Rheinberger's favourite Pianoforte Quartett in E flat. He sang Prof. NOW READY, with INTRODUCTORY ESSAY by LECTED WORKS of. THE COL(Uniform with the Eversley Edition of Charles Kingsley's Novels.) Globe 8vo, 5s. each volume. 1. MISCELLANIES. With an Introductory Essay by JOHN MORLEY.-2. ESSAYS.-3. POEMS.-4. ENGLISH TRAITS: and REPRESENTATIVE MEN.-5. CONDUCT of LIFE: and SOCIETY and SOLITUDE.–6. LETTERS: and SOCIAL AIMS, &c. "Of these editions, Messrs. Macmillan's is probably the MEMNO. BY DAVID S. MARGOLIOUTH, Fellow of The AUTHOR of "JOHN HALIFAX, GENTLEMAN.” WALTER BESANT, Author of "All in a Gardes Fair," &c.-The first part of a New Story, entitled "JULIA," by this Favourite Novelist appears in "The English Illustrated Magazine" for February. MR. HAMILTON's amusing comedy "Our was the solo vocalist. Price SIXPENCE; by post, Eightpence. ENGLISH ILLUSTRATED MAGAZINE CONTENTS FOR FEBRUARY. IV. THE CHARACTER of DOGS. By R. L. STEVENSON. V. THE HUMMING-BIRD'S RELÂTIVES. BY GRANT It is now nearly twenty-seven years since the Philological Society commenced the collection of materials for its great English Dictionary. The number of persons who have shared in the task amount to thirteen hundred, and this great company of labourers have accumulated a body of three millions of quotations, taken from over five thousand different authors. The first instalment of the work for which these unexampled preparations have been made is at length before the world, and it is now possible to judge whether the new Dictionary will be worthy of the enormous labour which has been expended upon it. Happily for the credit of English scholarship, the present specimen affords every reason to hope that the skill of Dr. Murray and his assistants will prove equal to the arduous task which lies before them. It would be wonderful indeed if, in so vast an undertaking, there should not be many things to which criticism might object; but it may be confidently asserted that, if the level of excellence reached this opening part be sustained throughout, the completed work will be an achievement without parallel in the lexicography of any living language. In comparing the Philological Society's English Dictionary with the only works which Can claim to be regarded as its peers the French Dictionary of Littré and the unfinished German Dictionary of Grimm-it must be membered that the scope of the English work is in several respects far larger than that proposed in either of the others. For ne thing, the period of time embraced in the English Dictionary is by several centuries onger than that surveyed by the great French ed German lexicographers. The classic French language of Littré begins no earlier han the seventeenth century, and the New High German treated by Grimm goes back only to the middle of the fifteenth century. But the aim of Dr. Murray and his coadjutors is nothing less ambitious than to catalogue and, so far as the materials suffice, to discuss historically every word which has belonged the standard English vocabulary at any time since the language passed out of the fully affected stage commonly known as Angloton. The epoch of this change is fixed by Ir Murray at the year 1150. The literary tarrenness of the hundred years preceding this date happily obviates much of the inconTence usually attending the assignment of a definite year as the commencement of a linguistic period. The compilers of the English Dictionary have therefore to trace the development of the language through a period of respectively three or five centuries, rich in literary remains, before arriving at the chronological points at which the labours of Grimm and Littré commence. Moreover, the year 1150 is not in the same sense the beginning of Dr. Murray's work as the dates fixed by Grimm and Littré are the beginning of theirs. It is true that both the French and the German writers have drawn largely on the literature of earlier centuries for the philological illustration of the words included in their Dictionaries, but they have not done so with anything like the fullness aimed at in the present work. Although Dr. Murray admits no word which became obsolete before his initial date, yet every word which he does admit is carefully traced from its earliest appearance in "Anglo-Saxon" writings, and the successive variations of sense and form which it underwent in the oldest period are discussed with the same fullness of detail and illustration as those which took place throughout the succeeding ages. Again, while in the French and German Dictionaries there are many words and special senses of words for which no literary authority is adduced, many of the illustrative examples being simply sentences framed for the occasion, Dr. Murray in almost every case furnishes a quotation from an English writer, with minute references to chapter or page. The authorities quoted range in date from the Ruthwell Cross (here assigned to A.D. 700) to the Daily News of July 6, 1883. Another point which has added to the arduousness and the value of Dr. Murray's undertaking is that his standard for the admission of words to dictionary rank is rightly much less rigid than those set up by his predecessors. The Teutonic purism of Grimm led him to reject many words which every German understands, and which are freely used in the literature of his own and earlier times. No doubt many of the swarm of foreign words, and of words clumsily adapted from foreign languages by tacking on the termination -iren, never ought to have become German. But their naturalisation has been in fact recognised by the mass of speakers and writers of the language, and they should find a place in its Dictionary, although they might be branded with an obelus as philologically infamous. Dr. Murray has wisely gone to the extreme of admitting every word which is used by any English writer, provided that the author who employs it himself regarded it as standard English, and not as foreign, dialectal, or technical. One great merit of the new Dictionary is the remarkable manner in which the convenience of readers is consulted in the typographical expedients employed to ensure facility of reference. This advantage is indeed shared to some extent by the other lexicographical publications of the Clarendon Press, and notably by the Etymological Dictionary of Prof. Skeat; but it is here carried to a degree of perfection never before aimed at. The size of the page is identical with that adopted in Littré's Dictionary; but a page of Littré is, typographically, a chaos through which the reader must find his way as best he can, while in the English Dictionary the eye is at once directed to the object of which it is in search. Littré, for instance, prints the illustrative examples in the same type, and continuously with the definitions, the only use of strengthened type being in the Arabic figures prefixed to each definition. In the present work, the standard form of each word is printed in large "Clarendon" type, which stands out boldly from the page, so as to catch the eye at once. The various historical forms are given in "small Clarendon," and the definitions in ordinary type. Under the definition of each sense of a word are arranged the quoted examples in a smaller letter, each quotation being preceded by its date in heavy figures, so that the chronological range over which a word, or a sense of a word, extends may be measured at a glance. In this way the several definitions of a word are spaced off from each other by an intervening paragraph of smaller type. The value of this arrangement in abridging the labour of consulting the Dictionary can scarcely be over-estimated. It can With regard to the definitions, which form the strongest point of Littré's Dictionary, and the weakest point of that of Grimm, the present work may, perhaps, be considered to hold a middle rank between the two. scarcely be charged as a fault that Dr. Murray has not imitated the excessive subdivision of significations into which Littré has frequently run. To give twenty-three numbered senses of the word eau, for instance, is an over-refinement which is rather confusing than helpful. The definitions of previous lexicographers have frequently been accepted by Dr. Murray, in many cases with due acknowledgment of their source. Here and there we notice a definition which seems incorrect or inadequate. The modern sense of ache, for instance, is not exactly "a continuous or abiding pain, in contrast to a sharp or sudden one;" and when it is said that this word is "used of both physical and mental sensation," it should have been noted that the latter use is somewhat forced and rhetorical. We speak quite naturally of a mental pain; but when we use ache in a similar sense we are consciously employing figurative language. Kingsley's phrase, "healthy animalism," is certainly out of place as part of the definition of Animal Spirits; the expression (at least as Kingsley used it) denotes something quite different. The one portion of the Dictionary which may be charged with incompleteness is what may be termed the phraseological department. Here, as in the definitions, Littré often falls into an excess of copiousness which need not be imitated. Still, a dictionary of this character ought to contain every combination of words which has any fair claim to rank as an idiomatic phrase. Thus, under the word Acting we may reasonably look for "acting edition," "acting play; under Agent for "free agent," and other similar expressions; under Able for "able seaman." None of these are formally noted in this Dictionary, though some of them appear in the quotations. Under Alive we miss the familiar phrase" alive and kicking," for which literary authority could probably be found. Under Age the combination "old age "of course occurs in the examples, but its idiomatic |