Page images
PDF
EPUB

The "Scots Digest," a complete digest of reported cases from 1800-1914, with supplements keeping it always up to date, was a natural complement to the foregoing work.

The "Scots Style Book was another legal encyclopædia which Mr Green found was required and which he took in hand to supply, the demand for these works proving how indispensable they were to the profession.

The "Scots Statutes Revised" from 14241918, being a complete series of all the public general statutes affecting Scotland which are still in force, has been brought down to date in 14 volumes.

The "Encyclopædia of Accounting" followed in due course, and as a matter of course, and by reason of its not being confined to Scotland, it has been ordered from all parts of the world.

Agriculture had long been a favourite study of Mr Green's, hence he now produced an "Encyclopædia of Agriculture" which in a very literal sense covered the whole field.

Mr Green began in 1889 the "Juridical Review," a quarterly legal magazine, which is now entering its 32nd year, and in 1893 he started the "Scots Law Times," and in the ordinary course of business he has published a large number of legal and medical treatises, including the "Parliament-House Book," and during war time started a new quarterly, entitled the "Veterinary Review."

It was characteristic of Mr Green not to allow any difficulty to stand in his way when he was carrying out his plans; hence, when it became necessary to have a printing office of his own, he proceeded to organise such an establishment, which having served the purpose for which it was intended was closed last year.

It is, however, in undertaking the publication of a complete re-issue of the "English Reports" that Mr Green has shewn his courage and enterprise; this monumental work, which embraces all the reports from 1400 to 1866, was to extend to about 150 volumes and it is now nearing completion, 163 volumes having now been published.

A short extract from the "Times" with reference to Mr Green's publications may be quoted in conclusion, viz. : "In no other country in the world would so important works as these, which contain in brief yet sufficiently ample space the whole law, have been carried out by private enterprise, but by the State at the public expense."

Mr Green has also written, edited and planned many other works, too varied and numerous to be mentioned here, and he has devoted a considerable portion of his leisure to the study of cancer, with a view to finding the cause of this malign disease.

Mr Green married a daughter of the late John Dalrymple, who survives to mourn his loss, and he will be greatly missed by a large circle

of friends, for he was of a kindly nature and thought no trouble too great if it was undertaken in the service of others. Possessed of great mental power, Mr Green pursued a strenuous career and persistently overworked himself for thirty years, with the result that his health had been seriously undermined, although he remained at business until the end.

The legal profession will be interested to know that arrangements have been made to carry on Mr Green's activities without interruption.

PUNCTUATION IN PROBATIVE WRITINGS.

The attention of the legal profession was pointedly drawn to this matter by a bench of seven judges which recently delivered judgment in the case of M. P. Ewart (Alex. Robertson's Tr.) v. Wishart. That case involved the construction of a will, and it was argued for one of the parties that the punctuation of the will necessarily led to a certain construction. The decision of the House of Lords in the case of Turnbull's Trs. v. The Lord Advocate (1918 S.C. (H.L.) 88; 1918, 1 S.L.T. 112) was founded on. print below the observations of Lord Cullen on Turnbull's Trs. in his leading opinion in M. P. Ewart.

We

"I desire to add an observation apart from the merits of the case. Until recently it had been, I think, the general understanding of the legal profession in Scotland that, in cases of disputed construction, punctuation found occurring in probative writings fell to be ignored in respect of its not sharing the probative quality. For it has not been the practice to use the testing clause of a deed either for the purpose of declaring the deed to be unpunctuated or for declaring in detail any punctuation contained in it; and holograph quality in punctuation is out of the question. I hope, therefore, that the attention of conveyancers will be given to the recent case of Turnbull's Trs. v. Lord Advocate (1918 S.C. (H.L.) 88), where the above view was rejected by the House of Lords and it was held proper to use punctuation found in a probative deed in construing it. In view of the law so laid down it may be for consideration whether, in the making of probative deeds in the future, some provision, so far as possible, should be made for guarding against the unauthorised insertion after execution of punctuation which may materially alter the sense, and the origin of which may wholly elude ascertainment. The difficulty is, of course, more acute in the case of holograph writings without any testing clause."

SLACK PLEADING IN THE SHERIFF COURT.

STRICTURES BY COURT OF SESSION JUDGES.

In a case which was decided by the Second Division on 3rd December 1919 some severe comments were made on a looseness of pleading which was said to be creeping into the practice of the Sheriff Courts. The case related to the poisoning of a cow by eating paint which had been scraped off a fishing-boat in the course of repair. The old paint scraped off the boat was said to have been left lying on the pasture of the pursuer's cow. The defender baldly pleaded that he, though the owner of the boat, had contracted with a man for its repair and was not liable for the loss of the pursuer's cow. No specific de fence was stated by way of denial that the paint in question was the cause of the cow's death, nor was the defence very clearly stated that the defender was not, in law, liable for the acts of the "contractor.' What followed may best be stated in the words of the Lord Justice Clerk:

[ocr errors]

"The proof went on and evidence was led on both of these points with no exception taken. In the first place, I think that if these specific defences had been to be founded on, it was the duty of the defender to state them on record and thereby give notice to the pursuer of the case he had to meet. I think equally it was the duty of the pursuer's agent, if evidence of matters of fact, apposite or which might be apposite to the case, but of which no notice had been given on the record, was tendered, to have objected that no such case was made on record. And it would have been the duty of the Sheriff-Substitute to disallow the evidence until the defence was placed on record.

"In this case nobody carried out what I think was their duty. The defender did not state his case properly; the pursuer did not object to the improper evidence that was led, and the Sheriff just allowed the whole evidence to be taken, with the result, as happens often, that your Lordships were faced with the case on a concluded proof, which had little relation to the pleadings, and we have had to spell the case out of the evidence. In this case we have had a good instance of how unfortunate that method might have been for the pursuer, because, had it not been that the veterinary surgeon, Mr Panton, who visited the pursuer's cow was the same veterinary surgeon who visited the two cows belonging to Mackenzie, which died some five months after the pursuer's cow, the result might have been very different from what it is.

there the grounds of action or of defence, which is not the proper place. And some day some poor litigant will find himself done out of expenses and will lose his case because of such irregularities and the way the procedure has been carried out."

Lord Dundas in the course of his opinion referred to the same topic, thus:

"I should only like to say in conclusion that I very much agree with the remarks made by the Lord Justice Clerk in regard to the procedure followed in this as in many of the cases that come before us. I do most earnestly agree that there is a great and growing necessity for more care and more reasonable vigilance in the Sheriff Courts in framing pleadings and conducting proofs, and I would fain hope that the observations made by my Lord may reach Sheriff Courts for their guidance, and, I hope, attention."

THE LATE SIR HENRY RATTIGAN.-The bench in India has lost a scholarly lawyer by the death of Sir Henry Rattigan, judge in the Chief Court of the Punjab. Sir Henry was born in 1864 and, after graduating at Oxford University, was called to the Bar, Lincoln's Inn, in 1888. He joined the Bar as an Advocate of the Chief Court of the Punjab in the following year. He held the post of Legal Remembrancer to the Punjab Government; and for several periods he officiated as judge of the Chief Court before he was promoted to that office in 1909. He was knighted in 1918. Sir Henry Rattigan made several useful contributions to the study of Indian law. The Digest of the Customary Law of the Punjab under his editorship attained its seventh edition; and he shared in the authorship of an important study on Tribal Law in the Punjab. Under the title of the "Law of Divorce applicable to Christians in India," Sir Henry published a careful commentary on the Indian Divorce Act, 1869, in which he made a comparison between the provisions of that Act and the divorce statutes in England.

MR W. G. NORMAND, advocate, has been appointed Editor of the "Juridical Review." All communications should be addressed to the Editor, c/o W. Green & Son Ltd., St Giles Street, Edinburgh.

WE understand that Tods, Murray & Jamieson, W.S., have assumed Mr J. D. H. Dickson, Mr W. Coventry, and Mr J. C. Scott as partners. Mr Dickson is a nephew of the Lord Justice-Clerk, and Messrs Coventry and Scott were well known as members of the staff to all persons who have done business with Messrs Tods, Murray & Jamieson.

"I make these observations to say that I think there is a laxity growing up as to procedure in the Sheriff Court to which we have over and over again referred. We do not find the case stated on record at all, and only find it MR CUTHBERT PETER LYLE, solicitor, has when we come to read the proof, discovering commenced business on his own account at

65 West Regent Street, Glasgow. He received his legal training in Glasgow, and acted as a procurator with Messrs M'Clure, Naismith, Brodie & Co., prior to and since he returned from four years' military service overseas.

DECISIONS IN THE ENGLISH
COURTS.

Miller v. Dott.

LANDLORD AND TENANT-LEASE-THEATRE

OBLIGATION BY TENANT TO MAINTAIN PRICES OF ADMISSION-TENANT RAISING PRICES.-A lease of a theatre contained a covenant by the lessee in the following terms: "The lessee will at all times during the said term maintain the prices of admission as now charged at the said theatre, and will not reduce the same without the consent in writing of the lessor first obtained." Held that the covenant did not prohibit the charges for admission being raised, but only prohibited them from being reduced without the consent of the lessor.-Chan. Div. (Peterson J.) -24th October 1919.

Davis v. Thomas.

--

MASTER AND SERVANT TERMINATION OF SERVICES ASSOCIATION OF EMPLOYERS FOR PROTECTION OF COMMON TRADE INTERESTS

Sidebottom v. Kershaw, Leese & Co. Ltd.

COMPANY

[ocr errors]

ARTICLES OF ASSOCIATION ALTERATION-SHARES-OBLIGATION TO TRANSFER TO DIRECTORS' NOMINEE-COMPANIES (CONSOLIDATION) ACT 1908 (8 EDW. VII. CAP. 69), SECTION 13.-Held that under section 13 of the Companies (Consolidation) Act 1908 the articles of a company may be altered so as to provide that a shareholder who carries on business in competition with the business of the company may be required to transfer his shares to a nominee of the directors at a price to be certified by the auditors to be their fair value, provided the alteration was made bona fide for the benefit of the company as a whole.-Court of Appeal (Lord Sterndale M.R., Warrington L.J. and Eve J.).-7th November 1919.

Dutton v. Sneyd Bycars Co. Ltd.

WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION-WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT 1906 (6 EDW. VII. CAP. 58), SECTION 8, SCHEDULE III—INDUSTRIAL DISEASE

em

DISEASE NOT SCHEDULED AS INDUSTRIAL DISEASE WEEKLY PAYMENTS BY EMPLOYERS EMPLOYERS RESISTING CLAIM UNDER WORKMEN'S COMPENSATION ACT-ESTOPPEL-AGREEMENT TO TREAT WORKMAN AS ENTITLED TO COMPENSATION UNDER THE ACT.-A workman was ployed by a firm, controlled by the Ministry of Munitions, to manufacture poison gas and conEMPLOYER MEMBER OF ASSOCIATION-ASSOCIA- tracted gas poisoning. The disease was not TION INDUCING EMPLOYER TO DISMISS SERVANT. included in the schedule of industrial diseases -At the request of an association of yeast under the Act (Schedule 3), but the employers dealers, of which he was a member, an employer made weekly payments to him and he was dismissed, on due notice, an employee engaged required to sign certain forms issued by the under a contract terminable on one month's Ministry of Munitions declaring that he was notice. Held in an action by the servant for entitled to compensation under the Act and an injunction to restrain the Association from forms of receipt which bore to be for amounts "interfering with any person. . . . company or due under the Act. On the weekly payments corporation with a view to causing such person being reduced he commenced proceedings under company or corporation to break his or the Act. Held that the employers were not their contract. . . . with the plaintiff. . . . or estopped from denying liability and that there was or to abstain from to cease to employ him . . entering into contracts with him and from in any manner otherwise interfering with the plaintiff in following his calling or obtaining or retaining employment," that as no undue pressure had been brought to bear on the employer the action failed, on the ground that a person who procures another to do an act which is not wrongful so far as that other is concerned can only be made legally responsible for its consequences if he has procured his object by the use of illegal means, and that this holds equally good when the inducers are a combination of persons formed for the purpose of protecting the common trade interests of the combining persons and the act procured is incidental to that purpose.-Chan. Div. (P. O. Lawrence J.).—3rd November 1919.

no evidence of an agreement that the workman was to be treated as entitled to compensation under the Act, and further, that the parties could not, by conduct or agreement, bring within the ambit of the statute a case not covered by its terms.-Court of Appeal (Warrington and Atkin L.JJ., and Eve J.).-10th November 1919.

JAMES WRIGHT FORBES, ESQ., ADVOCATE, good in quality and sufficiently varied in

[blocks in formation]

character to afford him experience which will be invaluable to him in his new sphere. In February 1917 he was appointed as Counsel for the Crown qua ultimus haeres, and during the War he also acted as junior counsel for the Liquor Control Board, for the Minister of Munitions, and in enquiries under The Coal Mines Act 1911. Throughout his career at the Bar Mr Forbes has shown himself assiduous in availing himself of those opportunities which

The "wild wind" which has wafted James Wright Forbes to be Sheriff-Substitute at Lerwick has taken from Parliament House one of its best known and most popular figures. Few men have more friends there, and an enemy reporting and literary work afford of maintain

would be as diffi

cult to find as a

needle in a hay

ing and improving knowledge of the law. Since 1902 he has been a reporter on the staff of the

[graphic]

stack.

Mr Forbes, who is a son of the late Mr Alexander Forbes (for many years Principal Keeper of the Register of Deeds), was born in Edinburgh in 1866. He went to George Watson's College, where he early gave promise of ability and power of work, taking a school bursarythe first of many such-at the early age of nine. Before leaving school he was Greek Medallist and gained one of the school bursaries

tenable at the University. In after life he has shown himself consistently loyal to his old school, being always ready to throw himself devotedly into the support of any scheme which has had for its object the welfare of "George Watson's."

Passing on to Edinburgh University, Mr Forbes in ordinary course graduated in Arts and Law, gathering honours by the way, being a classical medallist, and taking the Spence and Thomson Bursaries. In 1891 he was admitted a member of the Faculty of Advocates.

Mr Forbes soon obtained a considerable junior practice, which, if not so great in volume as his well-wishers could have desired for him, was

[blocks in formation]

with Mr J. E. Graham, K.C., he prepared a Digest of Local Government Board Decisions (1898-1914); he edited the Poor Law Magazine for a number of years, and contributed Legal Notes to the Accountants' Magazine; and acted as Lecturer in the Heriot-Watt College on Commercial Law, being appointed to succeed Mr Condie Sandeman, K.C., in this post.

Mr Forbes' knowledge of law and practice and his competency in affairs obtained for him frequent appointments as Commissioner in important cases. He acted for some time as an Honorary Sheriff-Substitute of Lanarkshire, and as interim Sheriff-Substitute at Falkirk, Stirling, and Perth. And amid his professional activities he found time to take his part in civic duties. He has acted as a Parish Councillor for Edinburgh since 1905, showing a keen interest in Poor Law Administration. And during the War he rendered invaluable service at the Y.M.C.A. Huts at the Mound, where he spent many long night hours in ministering to the needs of our soldiers and sailors.

C

Nor has he failed to cultivate the lighter walks of life. Always an ardent footballer, he played for three years for his old school. At tennis he was also well known. He fishes with enthusiasm and skill. And at golf and curling, he is a man who is a desirable partner.

The good wishes of many friends go with Mr Forbes to his new sphere of work, and with them hopes that at a not too distant date fortune may recall him to some place less remote from his old haunts.

rescind or vary any order which has been so pronounced but not executed prior to the passing of this Act.

The Act is to remain in force until the 1st day of July 1920.

66

It will be noted that in this Act the words or some other ground which may be deemed satisfactory to the Court have been omitted from the provisos which under the former Acts empowered the Court to give an order for recovery of possession. The construction of these words was recently the subject of consideration by a Court of seven judges in the case of Smith v. Barclay (1920, 1 S.L.T. 13).

[ocr errors]

INCREASE OF RENT, ETC. (AMEND- In that case the Court decided that a landlord,

MENT) ACT 1919.

[CONTRIBUTED.]

This Act, which came into force on its receiving the Royal Assent on 23rd December 1919, repeals section 1 (3) of the principal Act, the whole of the earlier 1918 Act, and section 5 (2) of the 1919 Act. These sections contained the provisions against the recovery of possession of dwelling-houses to which the Acts applied and the exceptions or provisos to these provisions.

The new Act re-enacts that no order or judgment for the recovery of possession of a dwelling-house to which the Act applies or for the ejectment of a tenant therefrom shall be made so long as the tenant continues to pay the agreed rent, etc., unless

"(a) the tenant has committed waste or has
been guilty of conduct which is a
nuisance or an annoyance to adjoining
or neighbouring occupiers, and the
court considers it reasonable to make
such an order or give such judg-
ment; or
"(b) the tenant, by subletting the dwelling-
house or any part thereof, or by
taking in lodgers, is making a profit
which, having regard to the rent paid
by the tenant, is unreasonable, and
the court considers it reasonable to
make such an order or give such
judgment; or

"(c) the premises are reasonably required by
the landlord for the occupation of
himself or some other person in his
employ, or in the employ of some
tenant from him, and the court, after
considering all the circumstances of
the case, including especially the
alternative accommodation available
for the tenant, considers it reasonable
to make such an order or give such
judgment."

The Act also contains provisions which empower the Court (1) to stay or suspend execution of any orders it may have made before the passing of this Act for recovery of possession on such conditions as it may deem fit, and (2) to

who had received notice to quit from his tenant and had on the faith of that notice re-let the subjects, was entitled to a warrant of ejection against his tenant who had subsequently refused to remove. The terms of the present Act are such as to preclude a similar decision being pronounced during the period for which the new Act remains in force, unless indeed the landlord could succeed in such a case on the ground that the tenant had contracted himself out of the provisions of the Act. Such a view was canvassed in Smith v. Barclay, and received the adhesion of the Sheriff-Substitute; but the balance of opinion in the Court of Session seemed to be against it.

As from 1st July next landlords will, if no further legislation is forthcoming, again have the privilege of selecting their own tenants. It is difficult to understand why that date should have been chosen for the termination of the Act in so far as it applies to Scotland. It may have been chosen for the purpose of giving undesired tenants a few weeks' free residence prior to their ejection, for there seems no legal hindrance to a landlord refusing to agree to a continuation of a lease after 28th May next, although he would have to wait until 1st July before he could get the assistance of the Court to regain possession of his own house either for himself or a tenant of his choosing.

FACULTY OF ADVOCATES.

The Anniversary Meeting of the Faculty of Advocates was held on 14th January in the Advocates' Library, Dean of Faculty, Mr C. D. Murray, presiding. The Faculty officials for the ensuing year were appointed as follows: Dean of Faculty, Mr C. D. Murray, C.M.G., K.C., M.P.; Vice-Dean, Mr James A. Fleming, K.C.; Treasurer of the Faculty and of the Chalmers Trust, Mr J. Cowan, K.C.; Keeper of the Library and Clerk of Faculty, Mr W. K. Dickson, LL.D.; Auditor, Mr W. H. Cook, C.A.; Mr A. N. Skelton and Mr W. G. Normand were appointed Reporters on Probabilis Causa; and the following Members of Faculty were appointed Counsel for

« PreviousContinue »