No Party Now: Politics in the Civil War NorthDuring the Civil War, Northerners fought each other in elections with almost as much zeal as they fought Southern rebels on the battlefield. Yet politicians and voters alike claimed that partisanship was dangerous in a time of national crisis. In No Party Now, Adam I. P. Smith challenges the prevailing view that political processes in the North somehow helped the Union be more stable and effective in the war. Instead, Smith argues, early efforts to suspend party politics collapsed in the face of divisions over slavery and the purpose of the war. At the same time, new contexts for political mobilization, such as the army and the avowedly non-partisan Union Leagues, undermined conventional partisan practices. The administration's supporters soon used the power of anti-party discourse to their advantage by connecting their own antislavery arguments to a powerful nationalist ideology. By the time of the 1864 election they sought to de-legitimize partisan opposition with slogans like "No Party Now But All For Our Country!" No Party Now offers a reinterpretation of Northern wartime politics that challenges the "party period paradigm" in American political history and reveals the many ways in which the unique circumstances of war altered the political calculations and behavior of politicians and voters alike. As Smith shows, beneath the superficial unity lay profound differences about the implications of the war for the kind of nation that the United States was to become. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 41
Page vii
... wartime experience. Did this unique crisis change the way in which politicians appealed for votes, did it alter the substance and structure of party competition, or the meaning of popular political engagement? Unlike their southern ...
... wartime experience. Did this unique crisis change the way in which politicians appealed for votes, did it alter the substance and structure of party competition, or the meaning of popular political engagement? Unlike their southern ...
Page viii
Politics in the Civil War North Adam I. P. Smith. questions of wartime politics played out. Foremost among these was the fundamental debate about what kind of a nation northerners were going to war to preserve, or to create. And bound up ...
Politics in the Civil War North Adam I. P. Smith. questions of wartime politics played out. Foremost among these was the fundamental debate about what kind of a nation northerners were going to war to preserve, or to create. And bound up ...
Page 4
... wartime became more than ever a battle over who constituted the legitimate nation. Whatever Francis Lieber may have advocated, it was difficult—not to say impossible—for Civil War Northerners to organize politically in anything other ...
... wartime became more than ever a battle over who constituted the legitimate nation. Whatever Francis Lieber may have advocated, it was difficult—not to say impossible—for Civil War Northerners to organize politically in anything other ...
Page 5
... with the royalist cause in England—was a particularly emotive epithet employed liberally by administration supporters to describe partisan opponents.14 This wartime political language arising out of the tension between 5 introduction.
... with the royalist cause in England—was a particularly emotive epithet employed liberally by administration supporters to describe partisan opponents.14 This wartime political language arising out of the tension between 5 introduction.
Page 6
Politics in the Civil War North Adam I. P. Smith. This wartime political language arising out of the tension between “normal” party conflict and the pressure for unity in the face of the enemy provides a lens through which to interpret ...
Politics in the Civil War North Adam I. P. Smith. This wartime political language arising out of the tension between “normal” party conflict and the pressure for unity in the face of the enemy provides a lens through which to interpret ...
Contents
3 | |
9 | |
2 The Patriotic Imperative | 25 |
3 The Emancipation Proclamation and the Party System | 49 |
4 The Union Leagues and the Emergence of Antiparty Nationalism | 67 |
5 The Army Loyalty and Dissent | 85 |
6 Slavery Reconstruction and the Union Party | 101 |
7 Emancipation and Antiparty Nationalism in the 1864 Election Campaign | 124 |
Conclusion | 154 |
Notes | 167 |
Bibliography | 223 |
Index | 259 |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
Abraham Lincoln administration American appeal argued army August battle Boston Brooklyn Daily Eagle called campaign candidate cause Charles Chicago citizens City Civil Civil War claim Club Collection Committee Congressional Connecticut conservative Constitution convention crisis culture Daily Democratic Party Democrats Division draft editor effect efforts election electoral emancipation example explained former George Henry History Illinois issue James John July June leaders leading letter Lincoln Papers Loyal loyalty majority March McClellan means meeting military newspaper nominated North Northern November October Ohio opposed opposition organization partisan partisanship patriotic peace Pennsylvania Philadelphia platform political politicians President presidential quoted radical rebel rebellion reported Representatives republic Republican Party rhetoric September Seward slavery Society soldiers South Southern speech tion Union League Union Party Unionists United University Press victory vote voters warned wartime Whigs wrote York