Fur-seal Arbitration: Oral Argument of James C. Carter ... on Behalf of the United States Before the Tribunal Or Arbitration Convened at Paris Under the Provisions of the Treaty Between the United States of America and Great Britain, Concluded February 29, 1892 |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 77
Page 11
... assert for herself an exclusive right to all the products of that region of the globe ; and it was also of course ... asserted a similar right , and made the practice of pelagic sealing , in Bering Sea , at least perhaps farther , but in ...
... assert for herself an exclusive right to all the products of that region of the globe ; and it was also of course ... asserted a similar right , and made the practice of pelagic sealing , in Bering Sea , at least perhaps farther , but in ...
Page 21
... asserted by the Russian Government . Nor does it appear from the text of the treaty of 1867 that Russia either intended or purported to make any such grant , for by Article I of that instru- ment Russia agreed to cede to the United ...
... asserted by the Russian Government . Nor does it appear from the text of the treaty of 1867 that Russia either intended or purported to make any such grant , for by Article I of that instru- ment Russia agreed to cede to the United ...
Page 22
... asserting its essential rights without taking advantage of localities . That is the explanation given by the Russian Minister . Lord Salisbury continues : On the 30th March Mr Adams replied to the explanations given by the Rus- sian ...
... asserting its essential rights without taking advantage of localities . That is the explanation given by the Russian Minister . Lord Salisbury continues : On the 30th March Mr Adams replied to the explanations given by the Rus- sian ...
Page 23
... asserted by Russia so many years ago , they protested against so vigorously . It will be obser- ved that in this letter of Lord Salisbury , which it is important to consider , he makes no allusion to any supposed question of property ...
... asserted by Russia so many years ago , they protested against so vigorously . It will be obser- ved that in this letter of Lord Salisbury , which it is important to consider , he makes no allusion to any supposed question of property ...
Page 24
... asserted the authority of the United States to repress this practice at once , and continued to assert that au- thority taking all the consequences . It is easy to see what that might have led to . Such a position once taken by the ...
... asserted the authority of the United States to repress this practice at once , and continued to assert that au- thority taking all the consequences . It is easy to see what that might have led to . Such a position once taken by the ...
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
agreed Alaska Aleutian Aleutian Islands American animals argument assertion authority Bayard Behring Sea benefit Bering Sea Blaine breeding Britain British Government Canada carried Carter citizens claim Commander Islands commerce consequence controversy convention course defend destruction draft engaged established exclusive exercise extent extermination fact females fish fur-seal grounds herd high seas industry international law jurisdiction killing latitude law of nature learned Arbitrators learned friend limited Lord Hannen Lord Salisbury Majesty's Government males mankind mare clausum ment miles municipal law nations necessary negotiations North northwest coast Pacific Ocean pelagic sealing Phelps possession preservation President prevent Pribilof Islands prohibited property interest protection purpose question reason reference regulations respect right of property Russia Russian American Company seal fisheries seizure Senator Morgan shore Sir Charles Russell Sir Julian Pauncefote suppose taken territory things tion trade treaty Tribunal Ukase United States Government wild
Popular passages
Page 184 - Sea, and what exclusive rights in the seal fisheries therein, did Russia assert and exercise prior and up to the time of the cession of Alaska to the United States?
Page 184 - Treaty? 5. Has the United States any right, and if so, what right of protection or property in the fur-seals frequenting the islands of the United States in Behring Sea when such seals are found outside the ordinary three-mile limit?
Page 18 - It is agreed, that, in any part of the Great Ocean, commonly called the Pacific Ocean or South Sea, the respective citizens or subjects of the high contracting powers shall be neither disturbed nor restrained either in navigation, or in fishing, or in the power of resorting to the coasts upon points which may not already have been occupied, for the purpose of trading with the natives, saving always the restrictions and conditions determined by the following articles.
Page 225 - God, who hath given the world to men in common, hath also given them reason to make use of it to the best advantage of life, and convenience. The earth, and all that is therein, is given to men for the support and comfort of their being.
Page 184 - Britain ? 3. Was the body of water now known as the Behring Sea included in the phrase " Pacific Ocean," as used in the treaty of 1825 between Great Britain and Russia, and what rights, if any, in the Behring Sea were held and exclusively exercised by Russia after said treaty ? 4.
Page 105 - Commentaries remarks, that this law of Nature being coeval with mankind, and dictated by God himself, is of course superior in obligation to any other. It is binding over all the globe, in all countries and at all times ; no human laws are of any validity if contrary to this, and such of them as are valid, derive all their force, and all their validity, and all their authority, mediately and immediately, from this original...
Page 106 - The true foundation on which the administration of international law must rest is that the rules which are to govern are those which arise from mutual interest and utility, from a sense of the inconveniences which would result from a contrary doctrine, and from a sort of moral necessity to do justice in order that justice may be done to us in return.
Page 351 - If the determination of the foregoing questions as to the exclusive jurisdiction of the United States shall leave the subject in such position that the concurrence of Great Britain is necessary to the establishment of Regulations...
Page 163 - ARTICLE II. With a view of preventing the rights of navigation and of fishing exercised upon the Great Ocean by the citizens and subjects of the high contracting Powers from becoming the pretext for an illicit trade, it is agreed that the citizens of the United States shall not resort to any point where there is a Russian establishment, without the permission of the governor or commander; and that, reciprocally, the subjects of Russia shall not resort, without permission, to any establishment of...
Page 64 - But, with this single exception, no nation has in time of peace any authority to detain the ships of another upon the high seas on any pretext whatever beyond the limits of her territorial jurisdiction.