 He must go further and must say, 'The accident arose because of something I was doing in the course of my employment or because I was exposed by the nature of my employment to some peculiar danger.  The Scots Law Times - Page 2911915Full view - About this book
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1917 - 1226 pages
...that it is not enough for the applicant to say, i 'The accident would not have happened if I had I not been engaged in that employment or if I had not...was exposed by the nature of my employment to some kind is established, the applicant must fail, becnusc the accident is not one arising out of and in... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1918 - 1116 pages
...must go further and must say, 'The accident arose because of something I was doing in the 7 n. R. c. course of my employment or because I was exposed by...nature of my employment to some peculiar danger.' " As regard the second branch, a risk is not incidental to the employment when either it is not due... | |
 | New Zealand. Department of Labour - Labor - 1912 - 1050 pages
...if I had not been engaged in that employment, or if I had not been in that particular place ' : we must go further, and must say, ' The accident arose...nature of my employment to some peculiar danger.' ' In the present case it was not the result of any peculiar danger incidental to the employment, nor... | |
 | Walter Addington Willis - Workers' compensation - 1913 - 476 pages
...(see pp. 10-16, ante), it then becomes necessary to see whether it has arisen out of the employment. " It is not enough for the applicant to say ' the accident...the nature of my employment to some peculiar danger ' " (Craske v. Wigan, [1909] 2 KB 635 ; at p. 638, per COZENS-HARDY, MB ; 2 B WCC 35 ; Warner v. Couchman,... | |
 | Massachusetts. Industrial Accident Board - Employers' liability - 1914 - 946 pages
...and Burn, 3 BWCC 507. Cozens-Hardy, MR, in Craske v. Wigan, 2 BWCC, says that it must be shown that "the accident arose because of something I was doing...nature of my employment, to some peculiar danger." The committee of arbitration had an opportunity to observe the employee, O'Connor, and the customer,... | |
 | Joseph Henry Beale - Liability (Law) - 1915 - 844 pages
...expressed by the Master of the Rolls in the case of Craske v. Wigan, [1909] 2 KB 635, where he says : " It is not enough for the applicant to say 'The accident...nature of my employment to some peculiar danger.'" As regards the second branch, a risk is not incidental to the employment when either it is not due... | |
 | Francis Hermann Bohlen - Torts - 1915 - 858 pages
...by Cozens-Hardy, MR, in the case of Craske v. Wigan (100 LT Rep. 6; [1909] 2 KB 635), where he says, "It is not enough for the applicant to say, 'The accident...nature of my employment to some peculiar danger.' " As regards the second branch, a risk is not incidental to the employment when either it is not due... | |
 | Law reports, digests, etc - 1915 - 1538 pages
...[and] if I bad Lord Dundas. not been in that particular place.' He must go further, and mustsiy, ' the accident arose because of something I was doing...exposed by the nature of my employment to some peculiar danger.1 " It appears to me that the respondent here a able upon the facts to meet the additional test... | |
 | Walter Monteith Glass - Employers' liability - 1916 - 566 pages
...from that which, so far as I am aware, has been the invariable rule of the court of appeal since these acts came into operation, namely, to hold that it...nature of my employment to some peculiar danger.' " Where a workman got harmless dust into his eye, and by rubbing it caused an abrasion, and thereafter... | |
 | Massachusetts. Industrial Accident Board - Employers' liability - 1916 - 870 pages
...Appeal, CozensHardy, MR, quoted his own words used in Craske v. Wigan (1909), 2 KB 625; 2 BWCC 35, — It is not enough for the applicant to say, "The accident...nature of my employment, to some peculiar danger." Then he asks — Can that be said in the present case? I am unable to see that there was any peculiar... | |
| |
