Thorough, whence wretched Trojans their vain missiles (2) Flinging. A tower precipitous that stood, Reared starward on the roof-top, (whence all Troy And camp Achaian,) round with iron, where (m) To the top story insecure the joint, Emprising, from its lofty seat we have uptorn, (e-vado,) go the whole way; pass over the entire space, whether upward, downward, or on the level; whether physically, as in the passage before us, or metaphorically as in Terent. Adelph. iii, 4, 63. Verum nimia illaec licentia Profecto evadet in aliquod magnum malum. Burmann, in his commentary on this passage, and Forcellini, in his dictionary, interpreting evado by ascendo, transfer to this verb a meaning wholly foreign to it, and contained only (incidentally) in the context. 66 () V. 460.. Turrim in praecipiti stantem, &c. In praecipiti stantemh. e. in alto positam; Cf. Juven, i, 149. Omne in praecipiti vitium stetit, i.e. summum gradum assecutum est." Heyne. I entirely dissent from this interpretation, 1st. Because, in praecipiti never means in alto, but always (not only in Virgil, but in all other Latin authors, and even in the very passage of Juvenal which Heyne quotes in support of his gloss,) on the edge of a precipice, or in such a situation that a headlong fall would be easy and probable. 2ndly. Because, if this interpretation be correct, Virgil has committed the double error, (a) of stating twice over that the turret was seated in a high situation, (first, in the words in praecipiti stantem, and then in the immediately succeeding words summisque sub astra Eductam tectis,) and (b) of wholly omitting to state that it was seated, (where it certainly 550 must have been seated, or it could not have fallen headlong on the besiegers,) sciz. on the edge of the roof, perpendicularly over the front wall. In praecipiti stantem being understood to mean on the edge of the roof, the description of the turret becomes simple, clear, and vivid; it was summis tectis, on the top of the roof; eductam sub astra, raised to a great height above it; in praecipiti stantem, standing perpendicularly on the roof edge, above the wall of the palace. not (m) V. 463. Qua summa labantes Juncturas tabulata dabant. Where the turret was connected with, and easily separable from, the highest story of the palace below. Heyne and Wagner understand summa tabulata to mean the highest story of the turret; but, admitting that the turret had a number of stories, the Trojans could have attacked round about with iron the highest story of a turret, eductam sub astra, without ascending the turret ; and having ascended, it seems impossible to comprehend how they could precipitate it on the Greeks, without precipitating themselves along with it; or indeed, how being in, or on, it, they could precipitate it at all. The words convellimus and impulimus are, of themselves, sufficient to show that the Trojans stood on the roof of the palace, while they tore up the turret, sedibus altis, (from its high seat, sciz. on the roof,) and pushed it forward, so as to cause it to fall on the besiegers. Loud ruin, and upon the Danaï bands Falls wide; but others take their place; nor stones Have ceased the while, nor missiles any kind. (n) 'Before the vestibule, and sill immediate, 555 560 On noxious grass fed, (whom cold brume had covered, Swollen, under ground,) now from his cast slough new And youthful-brilliant, with uplifted breast, High to the sun his slippery back convolves, (P) And muzzle-twinkles with his tongues tri-furrow. (n) V. 469.-Vestibulum ante ipsum primoque in limine. Vestibulum ante ipsum expressing only that Pyrrhus was in front of the vestibule, primo in limine is added to explain, that he was not only in front of it, but close to it, at the very threshold. (0) V. 471.-Qualis ubi in lucem coluber. I have preserved, in the transla tion, the break which Virgil has made in the grammatical construction, (in lucem.....ad solem,) and which seems to me to heighten the effect of this fine passage. Tasso, how much assisted by Virgil I will not pretend to say, has a similarly fine description of a serpent: Ma esce, non so donde, e s'attraversa Innalza d'oro squallido squamose Gerusalem. Lib. xv, 47. 48. (p) V. 475.—Linguis micat ore trisulcis. Not twinkles tri-furrow tongues in his mouth, but, by means of his tri 565 furrow tongues, sciz. by their vibrations, (linguis vibrantibus, verse 211,) causes his mouth to twinkle. I beg to re-assure the English reader that the, if he so please, uncouth words which I have used here, and occasionally throughout this translation, are indispensably necessary to the true representation of the original meaning; and that, without them, it is absolutely impossible, (so great is the unparallelism, shall I call it? of the two languages and rhythms,) to express, in English iambic, thoughts expressly adapted by Virgil to the Latin language and hexameter rhythm, and, as there can be no doubt, on many occasions specially selected by him, on account of their peculiar adaptability to that language and that rhythm. I might, indeed, with less trouble than the composition of these lines cost me, have rendered them as English and harmonious, as the most fastidious English taste and ear could desire, had I been able to prevail on myself to substitute my own thoughts for Virgil's, and translate (with Pitt,) lubrica terga (slippery backs,) golden scales; linguis trisulcis (tri-furrow With him huge Periphas, and he that drove Automedon; with him all Scyros' isle Come storming, and the flames fling to the summits : Seizing, the hard door forces, and the plated (9) Posts brazen from the hinge tears; and hath now, (r) The plank excising, hollowed the firm oak Into a huge-yawned window; appears within 570 The house; stand patent the long halls; appears 575 And they see armed men standing in the threshold. 'But the interior dwelling is confounded With groan and miserable hubbub; shrieks Thorough with woman's wailing the house-concave; 580 tongues,) forky sting; and micat ore (twinkles in the mouth,) darts. The following considerations, however, amongst numerous others, prevented me from even so much as inclining to give ear to the dictates of indolence, and translate after such fashion; 1st. That there is no lack of fluent translations of Virgil. 2ndly. That the essence of good writing consists in the clear, manly, correct, instructive sense, (Scribendi rectè, sapere est et principium et fons,) of which the fluent sound is at most but an ornament; a beautiful ornament, indeed, but still no more than an ornament, and for that reason always to be sacrificed, when its sacrifice becomes necessary for the preservation of that which it ornaments. 3rdly, and perhaps not least, that it is not morally correct to palter with an author's meaning, (and conse quently with his dearest of all treasures, his reputation,) for the sake of attracting to self, by means of a meretricious fluency, the but too easily won admiration of the ignorant. See second note, vers. 272. (q) V. 480.-Postesque a cardine vellit. It is sufficiently clear from this description, that the postes of the door of Priam's palace formed part, not of the wall, but of the door itself, and turned, with it, upon the hinges. See also verse 493. (r) V. 486.—At domus interior...... Tum pavidae, &c. Two distinct, successive pictures: one of the confusion in the domus interior, the gynaeceum ; the other, of the wandering of the women (after they have left the gynaeceum,) over the palace at large, tectis ingentibus. The huge house roaming, hold the posts embraced, And print with kisses. Pyrrhus' strength paternal (s) On urges; which nor closures, nor the guards 585 Themselves, endure may: to the frequent ram And wide the places fill with soldiery. 590 (t) Not foamy river, when, with conquering gurge, The twain Atridae; Hecuba have seen And daughters hundred; and, amid the altars, Priam defiling with his blood the fires Himself had sanctified; prostrate those fifty Bedchambers, hope so great of children's children, Where the fire spares, the Danaï obtain. 595 600 And what was Priam's fate? perhaps thou askest. And wrecked his dwelling's entrance, he beheld, And midst the penetrail the foe, in arms Unwonted long, age-palsied shoulders casing In vain, and girt with useless sword, the old man 605 (s) V. 491.-Claustra. See note En. Then David said, God hath broken ii, 259. (t) V. 496. Non sic, aggeribus ruptis, quum spumeus amnis Exiit, &c. in upon mine enemies by mine hand, Into the thick of the foe rushes, to die. Bare axis, a huge altar stood, and, close by, 610 In black storm,) close sat crowded, and the Gods' 615 Images clasping; but, when youthful-armed (u) Girt thee? or whither rushest? Not such aid (u) V. 521.—Non tali auxilio, nec defensoribus istis. The commentators and translators refer these words to Priam; Defensoribus istis, qualis tu es. Forbiger. This is undoubtedly erroneous; for, 1st. It is incredible that the exquisite judgment of Virgil would put into the mouth of Hecuba, on such an occasion, words contemptuous of, and offensive to, the aged king, her husband; Tali auxilio, such help as thine; defensoribus istis; such defenders as thee, forsooth! 2ndly. The passage, so understood, is utterly inconsistent with the subsequent, non, si ipse meus nunc afforet Hector; for the presence of Hector could not render the puny assistance of Priam in the least degree more useful. 3rdly. The contrast between the assistance brought by Priam, and that assistance, which alone Hecuba considered as of any use, viz. the protection of the altar, is not sufficiently striking. I therefore refer tali auxilio....defensoribus istis to telis in the preceding line; so understood the words are, 620 (a) perfectly void of offence towards Priam; (b) harmonise with non, si ipse meus nunc afforet Hector, the meaning being that arms are now useless, even although Hector himself were here to use them; and (c) afford a stronger sense, inasmuch as the protection of arms contrasts, more strongly than the protection of Priam, with the protection afforded by the altar. In confirmation of this view, it will be observed that in the description which Virgil has given of Priam, in the immediately preceding verses, it is not so much the mere imbecility of the old man, which he wishes to place before our eyes, as the more affecting picture of that imbecility clothed in, and attempting to wield, arms :— Arma diu senior desueta trementibus aevo Ipsum....sumptis Priamum juvenilibus armis Ut vidit quae mens tam dira, miserrime conjux, Impulit his cingi telis? Aut quo ruis? inquit, |