Co. is a favorite of the law, and that a claim against him is strictissimi juris does not apply where the bond or undertaking is executed upon a consideration by a corporation organized to make such bonds or undertakings for profit. While such corporations... The Northampton County Reporter - Page 2031921Full view - About this book
| Law - 1920 - 496 pages
...Bank, Ky., 218 S. W 466 70. Principal and Surety — Paid Surety — The !"??«.* aw tnat a surety is a favorite of the law and that a claim against him Is strictisslmi Juris has no application where a. bond is executed by ?. *^.rJL^i f°T f compensation... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1892 - 1150 pages
...the contractor his principal, whose performance of it he has guarantied; that he is in this respect a favorite of the law, and that a claim against him is strlctlssimi juris." Kingsbnry v. Westfall, 61 NY356; Manufacturing Co. v. Kinimel, 87 Ind. 5(!U; Brandt,... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1916 - 1116 pages
...companies whose business It Is to become surety upon bonds for a profit the old doctrine that a surety Is a favorite of the law and that a claim against him Is strict issimi juris has been very greatly minimized. And the business of these corporations Is In all... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1912 - 1164 pages
...where a departure from the contract Is shown to be a material variance. 'The doctrine that a surety Is a favorite of the law, and that a claim against him is strletissimi juris, does not apply where the bond or undertaking Is executed upon a consideration by... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1914 - 1434 pages
...PRINCIPAL AND SURETY (§ 59*)— LIABILITY OF SURETY — CONTRACTS — CONSTRUCTION. The rule that a surety is a favorite of the law, and that a claim against him must be strictly construed in his favor, does not apply to a bond executed for a consideration by a... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1915 - 1282 pages
...the contract of his principal, whose performance of it he has guaranteed, that he is in this respect 'a favorite of the law' and that a claim against him is strictissiml juris. Wright v. Johnson, 8 Wend. 512, 516. If an alteration be made in a contract 'in... | |
| Oregon. Supreme Court, William Wallace Thayer, Joseph Gardner Wilson, Thomas Benton Odeneal, Julius Augustus Stratton, William Henry Holmes, Reuben S. Strahan, George Henry Burnett, Robert Graves Morrow, James W. Crawford, Frank A. Turner, Bellinger, Charles Byron - Law reports, digests, etc - 1892 - 664 pages
...terms of the contract of his principal, whose performance he has guaranteed; that he is in this respect a favorite of the law, and that a claim against him is strictissimi juris. (Kingsbury v. West/all, 61 NY 356.) And in determining the liability of a surety or a guarantor, it... | |
| Abraham Clark Freeman - Law reports, digests, etc - 1893 - 1034 pages
...terms of the contract of his principal, whose performance he has guaranteed; that he is in this respect a favorite of the law, and that a claim against him is strictissimi juris: Kingabury v. Wettfall, 61 NY 356. And in determining the liability of a surety or a guarantor, it must... | |
| Law reports, digests, etc - 1900 - 1164 pages
...the contract of his principal, whose performance of it he has guarantied; that he is in this respect a favorite of the law; and that a claim against him is strictissimi Juris.' " The note of $5,000 executed by R. Ella Matthews was included within the terms of the guaranty, and... | |
| James Barr Ames - Suretyship and guaranty - 1900 - 600 pages
...contract of his principal, whose performance of it he has guaranteed, that he is in this respect " a favorite of the law," and that a claim against him is strictismmi juris. Wright v. Johnson.1 If an alteration be made in a contract '• in a point so material... | |
| |