The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Constitutional Interpretation to Judge-made LawThis major history of judicial review, revised to include the Rehnquist court, shows how modern courts have used their power to create new "rights with fateful political consequences." Originally published by Basic Books. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 47
Page xiii
... extent of judicial power by showing three things . First , the very nature of judicial review has changed . Contem- porary judicial review has assumed a form quite different from that of Marbury v . Madison , though most Americans , and ...
... extent of judicial power by showing three things . First , the very nature of judicial review has changed . Contem- porary judicial review has assumed a form quite different from that of Marbury v . Madison , though most Americans , and ...
Page 10
... extent , in American society as a whole , over how to justify it . One ground of support for an expansive judicial power has been simple satis- faction with its results . The proof of the pudding is in the tasting , sup- porters of the ...
... extent , in American society as a whole , over how to justify it . One ground of support for an expansive judicial power has been simple satis- faction with its results . The proof of the pudding is in the tasting , sup- porters of the ...
Page 14
... extent , defend this early or traditional approach to constitutional interpretation and judicial power . I say " to some extent , " because I seek to show here only that such an approach is possible , against the modern critique that ...
... extent , defend this early or traditional approach to constitutional interpretation and judicial power . I say " to some extent , " because I seek to show here only that such an approach is possible , against the modern critique that ...
Page 22
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 26
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
IV | 17 |
V | 18 |
VI | 20 |
VII | 24 |
VIII | 37 |
IX | 39 |
XI | 41 |
XII | 51 |
LIX | 219 |
LX | 222 |
LXI | 223 |
LXIII | 230 |
LXIV | 239 |
LXV | 241 |
LXVI | 242 |
LXVII | 248 |
XIII | 56 |
XIV | 63 |
XV | 71 |
XVI | 73 |
XVII | 74 |
XVIII | 76 |
XIX | 80 |
XX | 84 |
XXI | 90 |
XXIII | 97 |
XXIV | 101 |
XXV | 116 |
XXVI | 121 |
XXVII | 123 |
XXIX | 127 |
XXX | 131 |
XXXI | 138 |
XXXII | 140 |
XXXIII | 144 |
XXXV | 148 |
XXXVI | 150 |
XXXVII | 153 |
XXXVIII | 156 |
XXXIX | 160 |
XL | 164 |
XLI | 166 |
XLII | 168 |
XLIII | 169 |
XLIV | 170 |
XLV | 172 |
XLVI | 178 |
XLVII | 181 |
XLVIII | 182 |
XLIX | 184 |
L | 188 |
LI | 192 |
LII | 195 |
LIII | 199 |
LIV | 205 |
LVI | 207 |
LVII | 209 |
LVIII | 216 |
LXVIII | 256 |
LXIX | 258 |
LXX | 259 |
LXXI | 262 |
LXXII | 265 |
LXXIII | 268 |
LXXIV | 275 |
LXXV | 277 |
LXXVI | 281 |
LXXVII | 282 |
LXXVIII | 286 |
LXXIX | 289 |
LXXX | 292 |
LXXXI | 294 |
LXXXII | 298 |
LXXXIII | 307 |
LXXXIV | 310 |
LXXXV | 313 |
LXXXVI | 315 |
LXXXVII | 318 |
LXXXVIII | 321 |
LXXXIX | 323 |
XC | 325 |
XCI | 327 |
XCII | 329 |
XCIII | 336 |
XCIV | 343 |
XCV | 352 |
XCVI | 359 |
XCVII | 360 |
XCVIII | 365 |
XCIX | 369 |
C | 377 |
CI | 379 |
CII | 381 |
CIII | 384 |
CIV | 397 |
CV | 403 |
433 | |
441 | |
445 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
American applied approach argued argument basis Bill of Rights broad Burger Court Cardozo Choper clear and present commerce clause Congress consti constitutional interpretation constitutional law constitutional provisions constitutionality context contract clause debate decisions defendants dissent doctrine Dred Scott due process clause economic effect enforce equal protection established establishment clause example exercise fact federal Federalist Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment framers fundamental grounds guarantee Hamilton Holmes Ibid important intent interest interpretation and judicial interpretivism interstate commerce involved issue judges judicial activism judicial power judiciary Justice laissez-faire legislature liberty limits Madison majority Marbury Marshall Marshall's meaning ment Modern Judicial Review nature opinion particular political present danger principles prohibition question reasonable regulation rules of interpretation separation of powers simply standard statute substantive due process Supreme Court theory tion tional traditional tution unconstitutional upheld violated vote Warren Court Wheaton words