The Rise of Modern Judicial Review: From Constitutional Interpretation to Judge-made LawThis major history of judicial review, revised to include the Rehnquist court, shows how modern courts have used their power to create new "rights with fateful political consequences." Originally published by Basic Books. |
From inside the book
Results 1-5 of 81
Page x
... broad judicial activism ) , and new statements of it have emerged recently , as in Edwin Chemerinsky's Interpreting the Constitution , Laurence Tribe and Michael Dorf's On Reading the Constitu- tion , and Harry Wellington's Interpreting ...
... broad judicial activism ) , and new statements of it have emerged recently , as in Edwin Chemerinsky's Interpreting the Constitution , Laurence Tribe and Michael Dorf's On Reading the Constitu- tion , and Harry Wellington's Interpreting ...
Page 7
... broad- ened . The result has been involvement of courts in decisions that would earlier have been thought unfit for adjudication . Judicial activity has extended to welfare administration , prison administration , and mental hospital ...
... broad- ened . The result has been involvement of courts in decisions that would earlier have been thought unfit for adjudication . Judicial activity has extended to welfare administration , prison administration , and mental hospital ...
Page 11
... broad judicial discretion undermines the rule of law , permitting the judges to substitute result - oriented adjudication for the rule of the Constitution . The insulation of the Court from the political process — its antimajoritarian ...
... broad judicial discretion undermines the rule of law , permitting the judges to substitute result - oriented adjudication for the rule of the Constitution . The insulation of the Court from the political process — its antimajoritarian ...
Page 22
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Page 28
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Sorry, this page's content is restricted.
Contents
IV | 17 |
V | 18 |
VI | 20 |
VII | 24 |
VIII | 37 |
IX | 39 |
XI | 41 |
XII | 51 |
LIX | 219 |
LX | 222 |
LXI | 223 |
LXIII | 230 |
LXIV | 239 |
LXV | 241 |
LXVI | 242 |
LXVII | 248 |
XIII | 56 |
XIV | 63 |
XV | 71 |
XVI | 73 |
XVII | 74 |
XVIII | 76 |
XIX | 80 |
XX | 84 |
XXI | 90 |
XXIII | 97 |
XXIV | 101 |
XXV | 116 |
XXVI | 121 |
XXVII | 123 |
XXIX | 127 |
XXX | 131 |
XXXI | 138 |
XXXII | 140 |
XXXIII | 144 |
XXXV | 148 |
XXXVI | 150 |
XXXVII | 153 |
XXXVIII | 156 |
XXXIX | 160 |
XL | 164 |
XLI | 166 |
XLII | 168 |
XLIII | 169 |
XLIV | 170 |
XLV | 172 |
XLVI | 178 |
XLVII | 181 |
XLVIII | 182 |
XLIX | 184 |
L | 188 |
LI | 192 |
LII | 195 |
LIII | 199 |
LIV | 205 |
LVI | 207 |
LVII | 209 |
LVIII | 216 |
LXVIII | 256 |
LXIX | 258 |
LXX | 259 |
LXXI | 262 |
LXXII | 265 |
LXXIII | 268 |
LXXIV | 275 |
LXXV | 277 |
LXXVI | 281 |
LXXVII | 282 |
LXXVIII | 286 |
LXXIX | 289 |
LXXX | 292 |
LXXXI | 294 |
LXXXII | 298 |
LXXXIII | 307 |
LXXXIV | 310 |
LXXXV | 313 |
LXXXVI | 315 |
LXXXVII | 318 |
LXXXVIII | 321 |
LXXXIX | 323 |
XC | 325 |
XCI | 327 |
XCII | 329 |
XCIII | 336 |
XCIV | 343 |
XCV | 352 |
XCVI | 359 |
XCVII | 360 |
XCVIII | 365 |
XCIX | 369 |
C | 377 |
CI | 379 |
CII | 381 |
CIII | 384 |
CIV | 397 |
CV | 403 |
433 | |
441 | |
445 | |
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
American applied approach argued argument basis Bill of Rights broad Burger Court Cardozo Choper clear and present commerce clause Congress consti constitutional interpretation constitutional law constitutional provisions constitutionality context contract clause debate decisions defendants dissent doctrine Dred Scott due process clause economic effect enforce equal protection established establishment clause example exercise fact federal Federalist Fifth Amendment Fourteenth Amendment framers fundamental grounds guarantee Hamilton Holmes Ibid important intent interest interpretation and judicial interpretivism interstate commerce involved issue judges judicial activism judicial power judiciary Justice laissez-faire legislature liberty limits Madison majority Marbury Marshall Marshall's meaning ment Modern Judicial Review nature opinion particular political present danger principles prohibition question reasonable regulation rules of interpretation separation of powers simply standard statute substantive due process Supreme Court theory tion tional traditional tution unconstitutional upheld violated vote Warren Court Wheaton words