...than a subordinate meaning which applies to it. It must show that the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer. This it has not done. The 111 Opinion of the Court. showing which it has made does not entitle...

...that not merely has the mark acquired a subordinate meaning but the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer. 3. SAME — REGISTRABILITY— "CUBE STEAK" APPLIED TO MEAT TENDERIZING MACHINES. The decision...

..."shredded wheat" as a trade name, the claimant must show that the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer. [Italics ours.] [5] The term "trade name" was used in the body of the decision and in the...

...case, to establish a term as a trademark it must be shown that "the primary significance of the terms in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer." The refusal to recognize trademark rights in generic or common, descriptive terms is as...

...buy the same cola beverage he^diank yesterday can ask for "Coke" or "Pepsi" and be confident thtit he will be getting the same thing he bought yesterday....the producer.4 Nabisco ultinopoly, Inc. v. General Milk Fun Group, Inc., 684 F.2d 1316 (9th Cir 1982)(hereinafUr ciUd as Anti-Monopoly III]. The saga...

...Monopoly case, namely, that "the MONOPOLY trademark is valid only if 'the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer.' "" The court went even further and suggested how this rule might be translated into operational...

...than a subordinate meaning which applies to it. It must show that the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer." Thus, courts use the "primary significance" test to determine whether a mark has developed...

...than a subordinate meaning which applies to it. It must show that the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but (he producer." Thus, courts use the "primary significance" test to determine whether a mark has developed...

...those goods. To establish secondary meaning, it must be shown that the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product but the producer (citations omitted). This may be an anonymous producer, since consumers often buy goods without...

...has developed secondary meaning. This requires a showing that the primary significance of the term in the minds of the consuming public is not the product, but the applicant. There are three classes of evidence used to establish acquired distinctiveness: (1) a claim...