« PreviousContinue »
chancellor, or be brought there by his friends, to be inspected and examined. whether idiot or not: and if upon such view and inquiry it appears that he is not so, the verdict of the jury and all the proceedings thereon are utterly void and instantly of no effect.(i)
Another instance in which the trial by inspection may be used is when, upon an appeal of mayhem, the issue joined is whether it be mayhem or no may
this shall be decided by the court upon inspection, for which purpose
they may *call in the assistance of surgeons.(j) And, by analogy to
this, in an action of trespass for mayhem, the court (upon view of such mayhem as the plaintiff has laid in his declaration, or which is certified by the judges who tried the cause to be the same as was given in evidence to the jury) may increase the damages at their own discretion,(k) as may also be the case upon view of an atrocious battery.(I) But then the battery must likewise be alleged so certainly in the declaration that it may appear to be the same with the battery inspected.
Also, to ascertain any circumstances relative to a particular day past, it hath been tried by an inspection of the almanac by the court.
writ of error from an inferior court, that of Lynn, the error assigned was that the judgment was given on a Sunday, it appearing to be on 26 February, 26 Eliz., and upon inspection of the almanacs of that year it was found that the 26th of February in that year actually fell upon a Sunday: this was held to be a sufficient trial, and that a trial by a jury was not necessary, although it was an error in fact; and so the judgment was reversed.(m) But in all these cases the judges, if they conceive a doubt, may order it to be tried by jury.
III. Thé trial by certificate is allowed in such cases where the evidence of the person certifying is the only proper criterion of the point in dispute. For, when the fact in question lies out of the cognizance of the court, the judges must rely on the solemn averment or information of persons in such a station as affords them the most clear and competent knowledge of the truth. As therefore such evidence (if given to a jury) must have been conclusive, the law, to save trouble and circuity, permits the fact to be determined upon such certificate merely. Thus, 1. If the issue be, whether A. was absent with the king in his army out of the realm in time of war; this shall be tried(n) by the
certificate of the mareschal of *the king's host in writing under his
seal, which shall be sent to the justices. 2. If, in order to avoid an outlawry or the like, it was alleged that the defendant was in prison, ultra mare, at Bourdeaux, or in the service of the mayor of Bourdeaux, this should have been tried by the certificate of the mayor; and the like of the captain of Calais.(0) But when this was law(p) those towns were under the dominion of the crown of England. And therefore, by parity of reason, it should now hold that in similar cases arising at Jamaica or Minorca, the trial should be by certificate from the governor of those islands. We also find(9) that the certificate of the queen's messenger, sent to summon home a peeress of the realm, was formerly held a sufficient trial of the contempt in refusing to obey such sum
3. For matters within the realm, the customs of the city of London shall be tried by the certificate of the mayor and aldermen, certified by the mouth of their recorder ;(r) upon a surmise from the party alleging it, that the custom ought to be thus tried : else it must be tried by the country.(s) As, the custom of distributing the effects of freemen deceased, of enrolling, apprentices, or that he who is free of one trade may use another; if any of these or other similar points come in issue. But this rule admits of an exceptior where the corporation of London is party or interested in the suit, as in an action brought for a penalty inflicted by the custom; for there the reason of
() Ibid. 31.
(1) 2 Roll. Abr. 578.
Cro. Eliz. 227.
() 9 Rep. 31.
Co. Litt. 74. 4 Burr, 248.
* All appeals of mayhem are now abolished, 59 Geo. III. c. 46.-STEWART
the law will not endure so partial a trial; but this wiswm shall be determined by a jury, and not by the mayor and aldermen certifying by the mouth of their recorder.(t) 4. In some cases the sheriff of London's certificate shall be the final trial; as, if tho issue be whether the defendant be a citizen of Lon. don cr a foreigner,(u) in case of privilege pleaded to be sued only in the city courts. Of a nature somewhat similar to which is the trial of the privilege of the university, when the chancellor claims cognizance of the cause because one of the parties is a *privileged person. In this case, the charters confirmed by act of parliament direct the trial of the question, whether a
[*335 privileged person or no, to be determined by the certificate and notification of the chancellor under seal, to which it hath also been usual to add an affidavit of the fact; but if the parties be at issue between themselves, whether A. is a member of the university or no, on a plea of privilege, the trial shall be then by jury and not by the chancellor's certificate ;(v) because the charters direct only tħat the privilege be allowed on the chancellor's certificate when the claim of cognizance is made by him, and not where the defendant himself pleads his privilege; so that this must be left to the ordinary course of determination. 5. In matters of ecclesiastical jurisdiction, as marriage, and of course general tastardy; and also excommunications and orders, these and other like matters shall be tried by the bishop's certificate.(w) As, if it be pleaded in abatement that the plaintiff is excommunicated, and issue is joined thereon; or, if a man claims an estate by descent, and the tenant alleges the demandant to be a bas. tard; or, if on a writ of dower the heir pleads no marriage; or, if the issue in a quare impedit be whether or no the church be full by institution; all these, being matters of mere ecclesiastical cognizance, shall be tried by certificate from the ordinary. But, in an action on the case for calling a man bastard, the defendant having pleaded in justification that the plaintiff was really so, this was directed to be tried by a jury :(x) because, whether the plaintiff be found either a general or special bastard, the justification will be good; and no question of special bastardy shall be tried by the bishop's certificate, but by a jury.(y) For a special bastard is one born before marriage of parents who afterwards intermarry; which is bastardy by our law, though not by the ecclesiastical. It would therefore be improper to refer the trial of that ques. tion to the bishop, who, whether the child be born before or after marriage, will be *sure to return or certify bim legitimate.(2) Ability of a clerk presented, (a) admission, institution, and deprivation of a clerk, shall also be [*336 tried by cortificate from the ordinary or metropolitan, because of these he is the most competent judge ;(6) but induction shall be tried by a jury, because it is a matter of public notoriety,(C) and is likewise the corporal investiture of the temporal profits. Resignation of a benefice may be tried in either way;(d) but it seems most properly to fall within the bishop's cognizance. 6. The trial of all castoms and practice of the courts shall be by certificate from the proper officers of those courts respectively; and what return was made on a writ by the sheriff or under-sheriff shall be only tried by his own certificate.(e) And thus much for those several issues or matters of fact which are proper to be tried by certificate.
IV A fourth species of trial is that by witnesses, per testes, without the intervention of a jury. This is the only method of trial known to the civil law in which the judge is left to form in his own breast his sentence upon the credit, of the witnesses examined; but it is very rarely used in our law, which prefers the trial by jury before it in almost every instance.? Save only that when a
(*) Soo Introd. to the Great Chartor, edit. Oxon, s anno
(*, Hob. 85.
Co. Litt. 74.
Co. Litt. 74. 2 Lev. 250.
Hob. 179. (v) Dyer, 79.
(*) See book i. ch. 11.
* By numerous local acts for the recovery of small debts, the claim of a creditor may be sustainod by his own oath without the intervention of a jury.-Cutty.
widow brings a writ of dower, and the tenant pleads that the husband is not dead; this, being looked upon as a dilatory plea, is in favour of the widow, and for greater expedition allowed to be tried by witnesses examined before the judges; and so, saith Finch,(f) shall no other case in our law. But Sir Edward Coke(g) mentions some others; as to try whether the tenant in a real action was duly summoned, or the validity of a challenge to a juror: so that Fioch's observation must be confined to the trial of direct and not collateral issues. And in every case Sir Edward Coke lays it down that the affirmative must be proved by two witnesses at the least. *337]
*V. The next species of trial 18 of great antiquity, but much dis.
used; though still in force if the parties choose to abide by it: I mean the trial by wager of battle. This seems to have owed its original to the military spirit of our ancestors, joined to a superstitious frame of mind; it being in the nature of an appeal to Providence under an apprehension and hope (however presumptuous and unwarrantable) that Heaven would give the victory to him who had the right. The decision of suits by this appeal to the God of battles is by some said to have been invented by the Burgundi, one of the northern or German clans that planted themselves in Gaul. And it is true that the first written injunction of judiciary combats that we meet with is in the laws of Gundebald, A.D. 501, which are preserved in the Burgundian code. Yet it does not seem to have been merely a local custom of this or that particular tribe, but to have been the common usage of all those warlike people from the earliest times.(h) And it may also seem, from a passage in Velleius Paterculus,(i) that the Germans, when first they became known to the Romans, were wont to decide all contests of right by the sword; for when Quintilius Varus endeavored to introduce among them the Roman laws and method of trial, it was looked upon (says the historian) as a "novitas incognitoe disciplinæ, ut solita armis decerni jure terminarentur." And among the antient Goths in Sweden we find the practice of judiciary duels established upon
mucb the same footing as they formerly were in our own country:(j)
This trial was introduced into England, among other Norman customs, by William the Conqueror ; but was only used in three cases, one military, one criminal, and the third civil. The first in the court martial, or court of chivalry and honour;(k) the second in appeals of felony,(1) of which we shall speak in *338]
the next book; and the third upon issue joined in a *writ of right,
the last and most solemn decision of real property. For in writs of right the jus proprietatis, which is frequently a matter of difficulty, is in question; but other real actions being merely questions of the jus possessionis, which are usually more plain and obvious, our ancestors did not in them appeal to the decision of Providence. Another pretext for allowing it upon these final writs of right was also for the sake of such claimants as might have the true right, but yet, by the death of witnesses, or other defect of evidence, be unablo o prove it to a jury. But the most curious reason of all is given in the Mirror,(m) that it is allowable upon warrant of the combat between David for the people of Israel of the one party, and Goliath for the Philistines of the other party; a reason which pope Nicholas I. very seriously decides to be inconcluAive.(n) Of battle, therefore, on a writ of right,(0) we are now to speak; and although the writ of right itself, and of course this trial thereof, be at present much disused, yet, as it is law at this day, it may be matter of curiosity, at
(*) Co. Litt. 261.
2 Hawk. P. C. 45.
• In courts of law in general, it suffices to prove a fact by one witness. In courts of equity it is sometimes otherwise, and two witnesses are required. Vide post, ch. 27 and note.-Cutty.
• Now abolished, hy 59 Geo. III. c. 46, passed in consequence of a defendant having waged his battle in Ashford vs. Thornton 1 B. & Ald. 405.-STEWART.
least to inquire into che forms of this proceeding as we may gataer them from antient authors.(P)
The last trial by battle that was waged in the court of common pleas at Westminster (though there was afterwards(9) one in the court of chivalry in 1631, and another in the county palatine of Durham(r) in 1638) was in the thirteenth year of queen Elizabeth, A.D. 1571, as reported by Sir James Dyer,(8) and was held in Tothill fields, Westminster, "non sine magna juris consultorum perturbatione,” saith Sir Henry Spelman,(t) who was himself a witness of the ceremony. The form, as appears from the authors before cited, is as follows:
When the tenant in a writ of right pleads the general issue, viz., that he hath more right to hold than the *demandant hath to recover, and offers to prove it by the body of his champion, which tender is accepted by the
[*339 demandant; the tenant in the first place must produce his champion, who by throwing down his glove as a gage or pledge thus wages or stipulates battle with the champion of the demandant; who, by taking up the gage or glove, stipulates on his part to accept the challenge. The reason why it is waged by champions and not by the parties themselves in civil actions is, because if any party to the suit dies, the suit must abate and be at an end for the present, and Therefore no judgment could be given for the lands in question if either of the parties were slain in battle:(u) and also that no person might claim an exemption from this trial, as was allowed in criminal cases where the battle was waged in person
A piece of ground is then in due time set out of sixty feet square, enclosed with lists, and on one side a court erected for the judges of the court of coni. mon pleas, who attend there in their scarlet robes; and also a bar is prepared for the learned sergeants-at-law. When the court sits, which ought to be by sunrising, proclamation is made for the parties and their champions, who are introduced by two knights and are dressed in a coat of armour, with red sandals, bare-legged from the knee downwards, bare-headed, and with bare arms to the elbows. The weapons allowed them are only batons or staves of an ell long, and a four-cornered leathern target; so that death very seldom ensued this civil combat. In the court military, indeed, they fought with sword and lance, according to Spelman and Rushworth; as likewise in France only villeins fought with the buckler and baton, gentlemen armed at all points. And upon this and other circumstances, the president Montesquieu(v) hath with great ingenuity not only deduced the impious custom of private duels upon imaginary points of honour, but hath also traced the heroic madness of knight errantry from the same original of judicial combats. But to proceed.
*When the champions thus armed with batons arrive within the lists or place of combat, the champion of the tenant then takes his adver
[*310 sary by the hand and makes oath that the tenements in dispute are not the right of the demandant; and the champion of the demandant then, taking the other by the hand, swears in the same manner that they are; so that each champion is, or ought to be, thoroughly persuaded of the truth of the cause he fights for. Next, an oath against sorcery and enchantment is to be taken by both the champions, in this or similar form :-"Hear this, ye justices, that I have this day neither eat, drank, nor have upon me, neither bone, stone, no grass, nor any enchantment, sorcery, or witchcraft, whereby the law of God Joay be abased or the law of the devil exalted. So help me God and his saints."
The battle is thus begun, and the combatants are bound to fight till the stars appear in the evening; and if the champion of the tenant can defend himself till the stars appear, the tenant shall prevail in his cause; for it is sufficient for him to maintain his ground and make it a drawn battle, he being already in possession; but if victory declares itself for either party, for him is judgment finally
() Glanvil. 1. 2, c. 3. vd Not. Brev. fol. 2. Nov. Nar. tit. Droit, patent, fol. 221, (edit. 1534,) Year-book. 29 Edw. III. .. 12. Finch, L. 421. Dyer, 301. 2 Inst. 247. (6) Rushw. Coll. vol. 2, part 2, fol. 112. 19 Rym. 322.
Cro. Car. 512
() Dyer, 801.
Co. Litt. 294. Dyversyte des courtes, 304 (Sp. L. b. 28, C. 20, 22.
given. This victory may arise from the death of either of the champions; which, indeed, hath rarely happened; the whole ceremony, to say the truth, bearing & near resemblance to certain rude athletic diversions, which are probably derived from this original. Or, victory is obtained if either champion proves recreant, that is, yields, and pronounces the horrible word of craven ; a word of disgrace and obloquy rather than of any determinate meaningBut a horrible word it indeed is to the vanquished champion; since, as a punishment to him for forfeiting the land of his principal by pronouncing that shameful word, he is condemned as a recreant amittere liberam legem, that is, to become infamous, and not to be accounted liber et legalis homo ; being supposed by the event to be proved forsworn, and therefore never to be put upon a jury or admitted as a witness in any cause. *341]
*This is the form of a trial by battle; a trial which the tenant or
defendant in a writ of right has it in his election at this day to demand, and which was the only decision of such writ of right after the Conquest, till Henry the Second by consent of parliament introduced the grand assize,(w) a peculiar species of trial by jury in concurrence therewith, giving the tenant bis choice of either the one or the other. Which example of discountenancing these judicial combats was imitated about a century afterwards in France, by an edict of Louis the Pious, A.D. 1260, and soon after by the rest of Europe. The establishment of this alternative, Glanvil, chief justice to Henry the Second, and probably his adviser herein, considers as a most noble improvement, as in fact it was, of the law.(x)
VI. A sixth species of trial is by wager of law, vadiatio legis, as the foregoing is called wager of battle, vadiatio duelli ; because, as in the former case, the defendant gave a pledge, gage, or vadium, to try the cause by battle; so here he was to put in sureties or vadios that at such a day he will make his law, that is, take the benefit which the law has allowed him.(y) For our ancestors considered that there were many cases where an innocent man of good credit might be overborne by a multitude of false witnesses, and therefore established this species of trial, by the oath of the defendant himself; for if he will absolutely swear himself not chargeable, and appears to be a person of reputation, he shall go free and forever acquitted of the debt or other cause of action. *342]
*This method of trial is not only to be found in the codes of almost
all the northern nations that broke in upon the Roman empire and esta blished petty kingdoms upon its ruins ;(2) but its original may also be traced as far back as the Mosaical law. “ If a man deliver unto his neighbour an ass, (*) Append. No. I. 26.
illius infesti et inrerecundi verbi, quod in ore ridi turpilet (*) Est autem magna assisa regale quoddam beneficium, sonat, consecutirum. Er aquitate item marima prodita est clementia principis, de concilio procerum, p«pulis indultum; legalis ista institutio. Jus enim, quod post multas et longas quo vitæ hominum, et status integritati tam salubriter con- dilationes vix evincitur per duellum, per beneficium istius sulitur, ut, retinendo quod quis possidet in libero tenemento constitutionis commodius et acceleratius expeditur. L. 2, c. 7 soli, duelli casum declinare possint homines ambiguum. Ac per hoc contingit, insperatx et præmaturæ mortis ultimum (*Sp. L. b. 28, c. 13. Stiernh. de jure Sueon. L. 1, c. 9 svadere supplicium, vel saltem perennis infamiæ opprobrium Feud. 1. 1, t. 4, 10, 28.
6 The word "craven” has an obvious and intelligible meaning from the occasion on which it is employed. It is of Anglo-Saxon derivation, (crafian,) and means to crave, to beg, or to implore,—which to do of an adversary in combat was held to be cowardly and dishonourable, however hopeless the conflict, in the age of chivalry. See Kendall's Argument on Trial by Battle, 143, n.--Chitty.
•The right to wage law in an action of debt on simple contract still exists. See Barry vs. Robinson, 1 Bos. & Pul. New Rep. 297. In the case of King vs. Williams, (2 B. & C. 538,) the defendant having waged his law, and the master assigned a day for him to come in and perfect it, he applied, by his counsel, to the court to assign the number of compurgators with whom he should come to perfect it, on the ground that, the number being uncertain, it was the duty of the court to say how many were necessary; but the court, being disinclined to assist the revival of this obsolete mode of trial, refused the application, and left the defendant to bring such number as he should be advised were sufficient; and observed, that if the plaintiff were not satisfied with the number brought, the objection would be open to him, and then the court would hear both sides. The defendant afterwards prepared to bring eleven compurgators; but the plaintiff aban loned the action. 2 B. & C. 538. 4 Dow) & Ryl. 3.–CATTY.
Abolished by 3 & 4W. IV. c. 42, ;. 13 - STEWART.
(v) Co. Litt. 295.