tacarpal bones, ii. 927; application of the
tourniquet, ii. 927; amputation through
the metatarsal bone of the great toe, ii.
927; mode of operating when the flap is
formed from the sole, ii. 927; when the
flap is made from the inner side of the
metatarsal bone, ii. 928; the bone best
sawn through obliquely from within out-
wards, ii. 929; mode of operating when
the flap is made from the dorsal surface
of the metatarsal bone, ii. 929; South on
the consequences of amputation through
the metatarsal bone of the great toe, ii.
929; amputation through the interme-
diate metatarsal bones, ii. 929; mode of
operating, ii. 929; amputation through
the metacarpal bones, ii. 930; amputa-
tion through the metacarpal bone of the
thumb, ii. 930; South and Liston on
amputation through the metacarpal bones,
ii. 930; amputation through the fingers
and toes, ii. 930; amputation through
the phalanges of the fingers, ii. 930;
mode of operating, ii. 930; cutting off
the finger with a chisel, ii. 931; Mayor
on the amputation of the phalanges with
the tachy tome, ii. 931; exarticulation or
amputation through the joints, ii. 931;
cases in which exarticulation is required,
ii. 931; Scoutetten's mode of operating,
ii. 931; general directions, ii. 932: con-
dition of the parts around the joint, ii.
932; exarticulation of the thigh at the
hip, ii. 932; danger and statistics of the
operation, ii. 932; Jaeger, Krimer,
and South on the operation, ii. 933;
cases requiring the operation, ii. 933;
La Croix d'Orléans, Perrault, and H.
Thomson's cases, ii. 933; the modes of
operating, ii. 933; by the circular cut, ii.
934: Abernethy, Veitch, Cole, Jaeger,
Kerr, and Graefe's modes of operating,
ii. 934; by the flap-cut with a single flap,
ii. 935; Puthod, Hunczorsky, Bryce,
L'Alouette, Langenbeck, Delpech, Le-
noir, Plantade, and Manec's modes of
operating, ii. 935; with two flaps, ii. 937;
Blaudin, Larrey, Mott, Dupuytren, Lis-
franc, von Walther, Vohler, Bell, Bé-
clard, Liston, Begin, and Sanson's modes
of operating, ii. 937; the oval cut, ii.
940; Sanson, Guthrie, Scoutetten, and
Cornuau's modes of operating, ii. 940;
the preference given to Larrey's opera-
tion, ii. 940; after dressing, ii. 942; exar-
ticulation of the leg at the knee, ii. 942;
opinions respecting the propriety of the
operation, ii. 943; Jaeger's statistics of
the operation, ii. 943; modes of operating,
ii. 943; amputation with the flap-cut, ii.
943; Blandin, Rossi, Maingault, and
Kern's operations, ii. 943; the circular
cut, ii. 944; Velpeau, Cornuau, and Bau-
dens' operations, ii. 944; the operation

when the knee-cap is diseased, ii. 944;
exarticulation at the ancle-joint an infe-
rior operation to amputation through the
leg, ii. 944; exarticulation of the foot at
the ancle, ii. 944; Velpeau, Baudens,
Syme, and Handyside's modes of operat
ing, ii. 944; Syme on the advantages of
this operation, ii. 946; exarticulation of
the tarsal bones, ii. 946; the operation re-
stricted to the removal of the astragalus
and navicular bones, ii. 946; Hammond's
case of exarticulation of the astragalus, ii.
946; Green's case, ii. 946; general di-
rections for the operation, ii. 946; am-
putation of the foot between the astragalus
and navicular bones, and the heel and
cuboid bones, ii. 947; Chopart's operation,
ii. 947; cases requiring the operation, ii.
947; mode of operating, ii. 947; when
an under flap only is formed, ii. 947;
when an under and upper flap are formed,
ii. 948; Maingault's operation, ii. 948;
Langenbeck, Klein, and Richerand's ob-
jections to the upper flap, ii. 948; Wal-
ther's operation preferred, ii. 948; Scou-
tetten's oval cut, ii. 949; Blasius' oblique
cut, ii. 949; exarticulation of the meta-
tarsal bones, ii. 949; advantages and dis-
advantages of the operation, ii. 949; Hey,
Scoutetten, Lisfranc, and Münzenthaler's
modes of operating, ii. 949; exarticulation
of single metatarsal bones, ii. 951; pre-
servation of the great toe important, ii.
952; mode of operating, ii. 952; exarti-
culation of the metatarsal bone of the great
toe, ii. 952; mode of operating, ii. 952;
Langenbeck and Scoutetten's operations,
ii. 952; exarticulation of the metatarsal
bone of the little toe, ii. 953; of the middle
metatarsal bones, ii. 953; consentaneous
removal of the diseased tarsal bones, ii.
953; Key, Dieffenbach, and Ruyer's
cases, ii. 953; exarticulation of the toes,
ii. 953; mode of operating with an under
flap, ii. 953; with a flap on the dorsal
surface, ii. 953; with an outer or inner
flap, ii. 953; exarticulation of the second
from the first phalanx, ii. 954; of all the
toes at once, ii. 954; Scoutetten's opera-
tion, ii. 954; exarticulation of the arm at
the shoulder, ii. 954; various modes of
operating, ii. 955; compression of the
subclavian artery by an assistant safer
than with an instrument, ii. 955; Wal-
ther's operation by an upper and an under
flap. ii. 955; dressing the wound, ii.
956; Le Dran, Garengeot, Dupuytren,
Onsenoort, Lisfranc, and Champesme's
modes of operating, ii. 956; the operation
on the left arm, ii. 956; Astley Cooper's
amputation at the shoulder-joint with a
single flap, ii. 956; Hesselbach, Desault,
Larrey, Langenbeck, and Dupuytren's
modes of operating. ii. 957; exarticula-

tion with the circular cut. ii. 958; Mo-
rand, Sharp, Nannoni, Bertrandi, Alan-
son, Graefe, Cornuau, Sanson, and B.
Bell's operations, ii. 958; Scoutetten's
operation with the oval cut, ii. 958; Du-
puytren, Béclard, Bonfils, and Blasius'
operations, ii. 959; circumstances which
guide the choice of either of these
methods, ii. 959; removal of the injured
acromion or glenoid cavity, ii. 960; prac-
tised by Brown, ii. 960; recommended
by Robinson and Fraser, ii. 960; Lis-
franc's modification of the operation when
performed prior to the age of fifteen, ii.
960; gun-shot wounds of the head of the
humerus, ii. 960; excision of the head of
the bone, or removal of the broken pieces
requisite, ii. 960; Larrey's operation for
the excision of the head of the humerus
in such cases, ii. 960; Guthrie on gun-
shot wounds causing fracture of the hu-
merus beneath and exterior to the cap-
sular ligament, ii. 960; South on the
excision of the acromion, glenoid cavity,
or coracoid process in amputation at the
shoulder-joint, ii. 961; Liston, South,
and Astley Cooper's cases, ii. 961; exar-
ticulation of the fore arm at the elbow, ii.
961; mode of operating according to
Textor, ii. 961; Brasdor, Jaeger, Hager,
Rodgers, Dupuytren, Velpeau, Cornuau,
Textor, and Baudens' modes of operating,
ii. 962; erarticulation of the hand at the
wrist, ii. 963; modes of operating. ii.
963; Lisfranc's mode, ii. 963; South on
the precautions to be taken in the flap-
amputation at the wrist, ii. 963; exarti-
culation of the metacarpal bones at their
junction with the carpus, ii. 963; mode of
operating in exarticulating the metacar-
pal bone of the thumb, ii. 964; formation
of the upper or under flap, ii. 964; exar-
ticulation of the metacarpal bones of the
ring and middle fingers, ii. 964; Langen-
beck and Scoutetten's modes of operating,
ii. 964; Scoutetten's oval cut in exarti-
culation of the middle metacarpal bone,
ii. 964; mode of operating, ii. 964; in
the exarticulation of both middle meta-
carpal bones, ii. 964; von Walther and
Astley Cooper's modes of operating, ii.
965: Riadore, Guthrie, von Graefe, von
Walther, Jaeger, Astley Cooper, Larrey,
Tyrrell, and Bennaben's cases of excision
of part of the hand, ii. 965; mode of ope-
rating in exarticulation of the four meta-
carpal bones, ii. 965; Troccon's mode of
operating, ii. 965; when one metacarpal
or metatarsal bone is diseased alone, it
should be alone removed, ii. 965; exci-
sion of the first metacarpal bone, ii. 965;
of the other metacarpal bones, ii. 965; of
the first metatarsal bone, ii. 966; of the
other metatarsal bones, ii. 966; exarticu-

lation of the fingers, ut their junction with
the metacarpal bones, and at their own
joints, ii. 966; Dupuytren and Lisfranc
on exarticulation of the middle and ring
fingers, ii. 966; Barthelemy on the sec-
tion of the palmar aponeurosis after exar-
ticulation of the fingers from the meta-
carpal bones, ii. 966; mode of operating
in exarticulation of the joints of the fiu-
gers from each other, ii. 966; with two
flaps, ii. 966; Lisfranc's flap operation,
ii. 966; statistics of amputations, ii. 967;
IMMEDIATE AMPUTATION, ii. 967; im-
portance of the question, ii. 967; South
on the comparative danger of primary
and secondary amputation in severe in-
juries of the thigh, ii. 967; South's con-
clusion in favour of primary amputation,
ii. 967; South on the minor danger in
injuries of the leg or upper extremities,
and the consequent propriety of imme-
diate amputation, ii. 967; John Hunter's
preference of secondary amputation, ii.
967; John Hunter's objections to primary
amputation in severe injuries of the ex-
tremities, ii. 967; Astley Cooper's opinion
in favour of immediate amputation in
such cases, the constitution then having
but one shock to sustain, ii. 967; Ruther-
ford Alcock on the difference of the shock
to the constitution in such cases, when
occurring in civil life, and on the field
of battle, ii. 967; excision of the joints,
ii. 968; first performed on the knee-
joint, ii. 968; afterwards extended to the
other joints, ii. 968; Filkin, Vigaroux,
David, White, Bent, Orred, Park, Mo-
reau, Graefe, aud Davie's cases, ii. 968;
Sabatier, Percy, Roux, Moreau, Larrey,
Guthrie, Syme, Textor, and Jaeger on
the excision of joints, ii. 969; Wachter,
Vermandois, Kohler, and Chaussier's ex-
periments, ii. 969; objections to this
operation as compared with amputation,
ii. 969; advantages of the operation
principally referable to the joints of the
upper extremities, ii. 969; not so great
in operations on the other joints, ii. 969;
statistics of Jaeger, Syme, and Moreau's
cases, ii. 970; Crampton on the ex-
cision of joints, ii. 970; cases in which
excision of the ends of bones is pre-
ferable to amputation, ii. 970; contra-
indications to the operation, ii. 971; mode
of operating, ii. 971; direction and extent
of the incision in the skin, ii. 971; ex-
cision of the diseased bone, ii. 971; ex-
tent of bone required to be removed, ii.
972; instruments for excising the ends of
bones, ii. 972; arrest of the subsequent
hæmorrhage, ii. 972; dressing the wound,
ii. 972; after-treatment, ii. 972; untoward
occurrences during the after-treatment, ii.
973; after-bleeding, ii. 973; abscesses, ii,

973; fistulous passages, ii. 973; necrosis
of rare occurrence after this operation, ii.
973; after-treatment of the sawn ends of
the bone, ii. 973; excision at the shoulder-
joint, ii. 974; mode of operating in ex-
cision of the head of the humerus, ii. 974.
C. White, Orred, Bent, Sabatier, Moreau,
and Syme's modes of operating, ii. 974;
motions of the arm subsequent to the ope-
ration, ii. 974; excision of the elbow-joint,
ii. 975; Moreau's mode of operating, ii.
975; Dupuytren and Syme's modes of
operating, ii. 975; Moreau on the division
of the ulnar nerve in this operation, ii.
975; Dupuytren, Crampton, Jaeger, and
Syme recommend its preservation, ii.
975; Jaeger's mode of operating, ii. 976;
condition of the arm after excision of the
elbow joint, ii. 976; Crampton and Syme's
cases, ii. 976; excision of the wrist-joint,
ii. 976; Roux and Jaeger's modes of ope-
rating in excision of the lower ends of
the radius and ulna, ii. 976; dressing the
wound and after-treatment, ii. 977; Du-
bled and Velpeau's operations, ii. 977;
Butt's case of excision of part of the ne-
crosed ulna, ii. 977; excision of the hip-
joint, ii. 977; mode of operating, ii. 977;
by a simple longitudinal cut, ii. 977; by
the formation of a flap, ii. 977; by Tex-
tor's oval cut, ii. 978; dressing the wound,
ii. 978; White, Carmichael, Oppenheim,
Hewson, Seutin, and Textor's cases, ii.
978; C. White on excision of the head of
the femur, ii. 979; A. White and Fer-
gusson's cases of excision of the head of
the femur, ii. 979; excision of the knee-
joint, ii. 981; Moreau, Park, Mülder,
Sanson, Bégin, Jaeger, and Syme's modes
of operating, ii. 981; Jaeger's operation
preferred, ii. 981; Moreau, Park, and
Jaeger on the mode of union after the
operation, ii. 982; Syme on the treatment
after the operation, ii. 982; A. White's
case of compound dislocation of the femur
behind the leg, ii. 982; excision of the
ancle-joint, ii. 983; Moreau, Jaeger,
Mülder, and Kerst's modes of operating,
ii. 983; South on excision of the ancle-
joint, ii. 984; dressing the wound, and
after-treatment, ii. 985; excision of the
joints of the metacarpus and metatarsus,
ii. 985; mode of operating, ii. 985; after-
treatment, ii. 985; Textor, Kramer,
Roux, and Fricke's cases, ii. 985; excision
of the lower jaw, ii. 986; cases requiring
the operation, ii. 986; circumstances
admitting a favourable result, ii. 986;
priority of claim as originator of the
operation, ii. 986; Tyrrell's case of
necrosis of the lower jaw, ii. 986; exci-
sion of the middle of the lower jaw, ii. 987;
mode of operating, ii. 987; retraction of
the tongue, ii. 987; Dupuytren, Graefe,

and Astley Cooper's cases, ii. 987; re-
moving a portion of the side of the lower
jaw without the condyle, ii. 988; mode of
operating, ii. 988; Deadrick, Mott and
Wardrop's cases, ii. 988; excision of the
lower jaw with its condyles, ii. 989; Mott,
Schindler, von Graefe, Syme, Jaeger, and
Cusack's modes of operating, ii. 989;
Mott, von Graefe, Dzondi, Jaeger, and
Schindler on the previous ligature of the
carotid artery, ii. 990; White's case of
excision of the lower jaw, ii. 991; Graefe
and Mott's cases of exarticulation of one
side of the lower jaw, ii. 992; Cusack on
the non-necessity of tying the carotid
artery prior to the operation, ii. 993;
Cusack's cases of exarticulation of the
lower jaw, ii. 993; Liston's mode of ope-
rating, ii. 993; Perry's case of necrosis of
the lower jaw, ii. 994; resection of the
upper jaw, ii. 994; cases in which the
operation is indicated, ii. 994; Dupuy-
tren's cases of extirpation of the upper
jaw doubted by Gensoul, ii. 994; Ako-
luthus' case, ii. 994; Dr. T. White's case of
almost complete extirpation of the upper
jaw, ii. 994; mode of operating, ii. 995;
section of the skin and muscles, ac-
cording to Gensoul and Dieffenbach, ii.
995; Lizars the first to recommend the
entire removal of the upper jaw, ii. 996;
his description of the proposed operation,
ii. 996; Lizars' cases in which he at-
tempted to perform the operation, but
failed on account of the hæmorrhage, ii.
996; Lizars' cases in which he performed
the operation, ii. 996; Gensoul's case of
extirpation of the superior maxillary
bone, ii. 997; cutting away the diseased
jaw, ii. 997; Heyfelder's operation for the
resection of both jaws, ii. 998; Syme,
Liston, and Fergusson's modes of ope-
rating, ii. 998; O'Shaugnessy's case of
removal of the upper jaw, ii. 999; Het-
ling's case of osteosarcoma of the jaws, in
which he removed part of the upper, and
part of the lower jaw, ii. 1000; Liston
on the prospect of ultimate success in this
operation in cases of malignant disease,
ii. 1001; dressing the wound, and after-
treatment, ii. 1001; dangerous symptoms
which may occur after the operation, ii.
1001; recurrence of the disease, ii. 1001;
resection of the scapula (blade-bone), ii.
1002; von Walther's mode of operating,
ii. 1002; Haymann's operation, ii. 1002;
Liston, Janson, Luke, Syme, and Travers'
cases, in which resection of the scapula was
performed, ii, 1002; James' case of tear-
ing away the arm and scapula by ma-
chinery, ii. 1003; resection of clavicle
(collar-bone), ii. 1003; cases requiring the
operation, ii. 1003; mode of operating, ii,
1003; Cuming. Meyer, Roux, Warren,

Mott, Travers, and Chaumet's cases in
which resection of the clavicle was per-
formed, ii. 1003; resection of the scapula
and clavicle together, ii. 1004; Mussey,
M-Clellan, Gilbert, and Fergusson's cases
ii. 1004; Fergusson's mode of operating,
ii. 1005; Gaetani Bey's case of resection
of the scapula, and of the acromial end of
the clavicle, ii. 1005; resection of the ribs,
ii. 1005; mode of operating, ii. 1006;
in compound comminuted fracture, ii.
1006; Textor and Warren's cases of re-
section of a rib, ii. 1006; Dixon's resec-
tion of the cartilage of a rib, ii. 1006;
Roux' case of resection of rib on account
of necrosis. ii. 1006; resection of the
fibula, ii. 1007; Seutin and Malgaigne's
eases, ii. 1007; resection of other bones,
ii. 1007.

SUTCLIFFE's performance of the Taliacotian
operation, ii. 831.

SUTTON'S, Dr. case of a foreign body re-
maining a long while in the windpipe, ii.
396; case of ovarian dropsy, with dis-
charge of hair by the wound made in tap-
ping. ii. 492.

SWAN'S case of fracture of the neck of the
femur within the capsule united by bone,
i. 567; case of division of the peroneal
nerve, ii. 887.

SWEDIAUR proposes the word blenorrhagia
in lieu of gonorrhea, i. 155; objections to
the use of corrosive sublimate in cases of
syphilis in infants, i. 674.

Synovial membrane, inflammation of. See
Inflammation of the Joints.

SIME on inversion of the foot in fracture of
the neck of the femur, i. 565; distinguish-
ing character of caries, i. 682; characters of
caries, i, 684; treatment of caries, i. 686;
case of destruction of the bones of the face,
i. 699; salivary calculi, i. 715; prolapsus
ani, ii. 130; characters of prolapsus ani,
ii. 131; diagnosis between prolapsed rec-
tum, and hæmorrhoids and intus-suscep-
tion, ii. 131; case of wry-neck, ii. 153 ;
distorted position of the head caused
by caries between the occiput and atlas
liable to be mistaken for wry-neck from
muscular contraction, ii. 153; wry-neck
a cause of lateral curvature, ii. 161; sec-
tion of muscles in spinal curvature, ii.
169; carotid aneurism, ii. 232; removal
of internal piles by ligature, ii. 302; seat
of stricture in the rectum, ii. 336; case of
subcutaneous section for foreign bodies in
joints, ii. 710; prefers Liston's flap-opera-
tion for the thigh, ii. 909; objects to am-
putation through the shaft of the femur,
and recommends amputation through
the condyles, or trochanters, ii. 910;
formation of conical stumps in flap-amputa-
tions of the thigh; ii. 914; amputation
through the epiphyses of the femur, ii.

VOL. I.

915; mode of amputating at the ankle-
joint, ii. 945; advantages of this opera-
tion, ii. 946; excision of joints, ii. 969;
statistics of cases, ii. 970; mode of ope-
rating in excision of the head of the hu-
merus, ii. 974; in excision of the elbow-
joint, ii. 975; recommends the non-divi-
sion of the ulnar nerve in that operation,
ii. 975; cases of excision of the elbow-
joint, ii. 976; mode of operating in ex-
cision of the knee-joint, ii, 981; treat-
ment after the operation, ii. 982; mode of
operating in excision of the lower jaw
with the condyles, ii. 989; in resection of
the upper jaw, ii. 998; case of resection
of the scapula, ii. 1003.

SYMOND's, Dr. case of removal of the in-
verted womb by ligature, ii. 121.
Symphysiotomy, ii. 445.
SYPHILIS;-question of its identity with go-
norrhea, i. 162; observations and experi-
ments of Hernandez and Ricord, i. 162;
Hunter on the identity of the two poisons,
i. 163; accounts for the different effects
of the same poison by the gonorrhea pro-
ceeding from a secreting surface, and the
chancre being formed on a non-secreting
surface, i. 163; South on the frequency of
the co-occurrence of chancre and gonor-
rhea, i. 164; Benjamin Bell denies the
identity of gonorrhea and syphilis, i.
164; Hernandez' experiments on the
subject, i. 164; ulcers produced by in-
oculating with gonorrheal virus not
syphilitic, i. 165; Ricord's observations
and experiments, i. 165; Ricord's in-
ferences from the results of the inocula-
lation with gonorrheal matter, i. 165;
venereal ulcers, i. 640; distinguished as
primary and secondary, i. 641; causes, i.
641; South on the inappropriate use of the
terms "venereal ulcer" and "chancre"
as synonymous, i. 641; John Hunter on
the two modes in which the venereal
poison affects the system, i. 641; Law-
rence on the progress of syphilis from one
part of the body to another, i. 642; the ope-
ration of the venereal contagion requires a
peculiar delicate structure of the part af-
fected, or a deprivation of its cuticle, i. 642;
symptoms of chancre, i. 642; characters of
the pus secreted by venereal ulcers, i. 642;
John Hunter and Ricord on the period at
which chancres appear after infection, i.
642; John Hunter on the symptoms of
chancre, i. 642; Lawrence on the pro-
gress of ulceration in a syphilitic sore,
i. 643; Lawrence on the five kinds of
syphilitic sores, i. 643; the pus of the
ulcer the special vehicle of the venereal
contagion, i. 644; Hunter's experiments
by inoculating with the matter of gonor-
rhea and chancre, i. 644; Ricord on
inoculation for the purpose of distin-

u

guishing syphilitic sores, whether pri-
mary or secondary, i. 644; buboes the
first symptoms of general syphilis, i.
645; may be idiopathic, or sympathetic,
i. 645; symptoms, progress, and termina-
tions, i. 645; John Hunter on the true
venereal buboes, i. 645; Ricord on the
seven kinds of buboes, i. 645; Hunter
and Ricord on the existence of syphilitic
buboes, without primary sore, i. 646,
647; general syphilis attacks specially
either the skin, mucous membranes, or
bones, i. 647; John Hunter on the con-
tinuance of the constitutional irritation
from lues, independent of continued ab-
sorption i. 647; inflammation of the mu-
cous membrane of the throat, i. 647;
symptoms, appearances, and results, i.
i. 647; venereal eruptions, i. 648; symp-
toms, i. 648; Lawrence on the four
kinds of syphilitic eruptions, i. 648; her-
petic eruptions, rhagades, verrucæ, and
condylomata, i. 649; John Hunter and
Ricord on the non-infectious character of
the pus from a secondary syphilitic sore,
649; symptoms and results of syphilis
in the bones, i. 650; modifications of the
symptoms of syphilis, i. 650; primary
syphilitic ulcers no decided external
character, i. 651; Abernethy on pseudo-
syphilis, i. 651; Abernethy on the means
of distinguishing between true and false
syphilis, i. 651; Carmichael's objections
to the terms syphilis, syphiloidal, and
pseudo-syphilis, i. 652; Carmichael bases
his arrangement of venereal complaints
on the character of the eruption, i. 652;
Ricord on the causes of the varied ap-
pearances of chancre or primary syphi-
litic sore, i. 653; differences in secon-
dary syphilis, i. 654; prognosis, i. 654;
John Hunter on the relative rapidity of
cure of gonorrhea, chancre, and lues ve-
nerea, i. 654; Abernethy on the occa-
sional spontaneous healing of chancre,
i. 655; John Hunter on the relapse
of ulcers after chancres have cicatrized,
i. 655; treatment of syphilis with mercury,
i. 655; in treating chancre, an especial
indication to prevent general syphilis, i.
655; local treatment, i. 655; Ricord on
the destruction of the ulcer by the nitrate
of silver i. 655; internal exhibition of
mercury, i. 655; Lawrence on the exhi-
bition of mercury in cases of chancre,
and on the rarity of the occurrence of
secondary symptoms when mercury has
been used, i. 656; Lawrence on the ex-
tent to which the use of mercury may be
pushed, i. 656; Green on the use of mer-
cury in syphilis, and on the forms in
which it should be employed, i. 656; cir-
cumstances requiring the local exhibition
of corrosive sublimate, i. 658; Delpech

on frictions with the ung. hyd. cin. in
primary syphilis, i. 658; South on the
treatment of sloughing chancre, i. 658;
mercury not to be used either internally
or externally under such circumstances,
i. 658; mercury should be exhibited for
some time in smaller doses after the
chancre has cicatrized, i. 659; treatment
of buboes, i. 659; tendency of idiopathic
buboes to suppurate, i. 659; treatment of
the remaining ulcer, i. 659; treatment of
the indurated bubo i. 659; mode of open-
ing suppurating buboes, i. 659; Fer-
guson, Fricke, Reynaud, and Ricord on
the treatment of buboes, i. 659; South on
the treatment of suppurating bubo, and of
the subsequent ulcer, i. 659; treatment of
general syphilis by mercury, i. 660; ex-
ternal employment of mercury, when re-
quired, i. 660; sublimate baths, i. 660;
the internal exhibition of mercury pre-
ferable in ordinary syphilis, i. 660; local
symptoms require special treatment, i.
660; Rust's treatment of syphilitic ulce-
ration of the throat and palate, i. 660;
treatment of syphilitic eruptions, i. 660;
treatment of the granulations by caustic
or the knife, i. 661; of syphilitic diseases
of the bones, i. 661; mercurial fumiga-
tion in syphilitic ulceration of the tonsils
and pharynx, i. 661; South on secon-
dary syphilitic sores and their treat-
ment, i. 661; South on the treatment of
nodes, i. 662; necessary to vary the mer-
curial preparations in use according to
constitution and other circumstances, i.
662; Starke on the phosphor. hydrarg.
von Graefe on the iodide and bromide of
mercury, and Mendaga and Parent on
the hydrarg. cyan., i. 662; salivation not
necessary for the cure of the venereal
disease, i. 662; treatment of salivation,
i. 663; treatment of old cases of vene-
real disease, i. 663; Louvrier and Rust
on the friction-cure, i. 663; cases in which
the friction-cure is indicated, i. 663;
cases in which it is contra-indicated, i. 663;
South on the friction-cure, i. 664; mode
of employing it, i. 664; Wedemeyer, Rust,
and South on the number of times the
frictions may require to be practised, i.
664; the order in which the rubbings-in
are to be conducted, i. 665; symptoms
which occur during this treatment, i.
665; the Montpellier modification of the
friction-cure condemned, i. 666; treat-
ment to be adopted, if the salivation or
critical sweating be suddenly suspended,
i. 666; occurrence of spasmodic or ner-
vous symptoms, i. 666; subsequent treat-
ment, i. 666; Weinhold's mercurial cure,
i. 666; mode of employing it, i. 666;
Zittmann's decoction, i. 667; mode of
exhibiting it, i. 667; formula for Zitt-