Page images
PDF
EPUB

J.

7

Page.

ton

256

K.

245

390

[ocr errors]

Page.
Horsefall o. Mather
Hucks and Others v. Thorn Jackson v. Stacey

455 30

Jones o. Davison
Harman o. Gandolphi and

Others
Houston and Others, Exe-

cutors of Houston, o. Ro Kemble and Others v. At-
bertson

kins and Another 427 Horsefall 0. Davy Hindle v. Bell and Ano

L. , ther Hastings and Others v. Wil.

Lewis o. Smith, Esq. son and Others 290 Levy v. Costerton Hart o. Biggs

Levi and Others, ExecuHart d. White

376

tors of Angelo Levi, v. Harman o. Lasbrey

Barnes Headlam o. Hedley

463

Litt and Another o. CowHedley v. La Page

ley and Others

938 Head and Another 0. Lord Mayor of London v. Sewell

363

Joseph Israel Brandon 438 Hedbergh and Another v.

Lee v. Munn

569 Pearson

349

Lovelock v. Cheveley 552 Houstman o. Thornton

Lowden and Another o. Hill o. Leigh and Reay,

Hierons Sheriff of Middlesex 217 Harding o. Greening 531 Hutchinson o. Gascoigne 507 May and Others o. Christie 67 Hughes d. Morley

Marsh v. Pedder

72 Humble o. Hunt

Morris v. Stacey

153 Hay and Another o. Monk Milne o. Prest

house and Another 609 Mitchell and Others v. La. Hartley v. Harriman : 617 page

253 Hodgson v. Scarlett, Esq. 621 M^Cloughan o. Clayton and Hurd o. Brydges 654 Riding

478 Hardman v. Clegg

657 | Mills v. Spencer Vol. I.

647

M.

181

538

W.

Page. Page. Wakefield v. Gall 526 Withers and Others v. Lys and Another

18 Wood and Another o. Zimmer and Others

Yeates and Another v. Pim
Westwood v. Bell

122
and Another

95 · Warner and Another v. Barber

175

2. Weyland o. Elkins Wright o. Horton

458 Zwinger and Another v. Wyatt o. Gore 299 | Samuda

995

227

[blocks in formation]

SSUMPSIT by the steward of the manors of In an action
Ewell and Cuddington, in the county of Sur- of a manor for

by the steward rey, against the defendant, for fees claimed to be a particular

rate of fees due for his admission to six separate copyhold claimed to be

due to him estates, under the will of his father. -Plea the gene- from a tenant

on his admisral issue, and 201. paid into Court.

sion to six several copyhold

estates, if he The plaintiff had been charged with distinct and fail to establi

a custom for entire fees for his admission to the several copyhold his charges,

he may, notestates. Six admissions had been entered upon withstanding,

resort to a the Court rolls, copies of which had been made quantum meruit.

Held afterward by the Court, that where a person is admitted to several distinct copyhold tenements, the steward of the manor is not entitled, without proving a custom, to full fees on each admission, separately; but he may stand on his quantum meruit.

Vol. I.

« PreviousContinue »