Page images
PDF
EPUB

Just ready, 8vo., pp. 530,

THE VALIDITY OF THE HOLY ORDERS

OF THE CHURCH OF ENGLAND MAINTAINED AND VINDICATED BOTH THEOLOGICALLY AND HISTORICALLY, WITH FOOT-NOTES, TABLES OF CONSECRATIONS AND APPENDICES.

By the Rev. FREDERICK GEORGE LEE, D.C.L., F.S.A., Vicar of All Saints', Lambeth.

Contents: Preface-List of Books quoted or referred to. CHAPTER I.-Introductory: Statement of the Author's object. II. The Preface to the Ordinal of 1549. III. Form for the Ordination of Deacons, 1549. IV. Form for the Ordination of Priests, 1549. V. Form for the Consecration of Bishops, 1549. VI. The Edwardine Ordinal. VII. The Ordinal of King Edward VI.Objections. VIII. Ordinal of King Edward VI. in substantial harmony with the most ancient forms. IX. Some other ancient forms for Ordination. X. Medieval forms for Consecration and Ordination in the West. XI. The same subject continued. XII Eastern forms of Ordination. XIII. Forms of Ordination in use amongst the separated communities of the East. Christians of St. Thomas. XIV. The Nestorians. XV. Archbishop Matthew Parker. XVI. The Consecration of William Barlow. XVII. The Consecrations of Hodgk'ns, Scory, and Coverdale. XVIII. The Consecration of Archbishop Parker. XIX. The Nag's Head Fable. XX The Case of Bishop Bonner versus Bishop Horne. XXI. The Sacrament of Baptism. XXII. The Office of Consecrator and Assistant-Consecrator. XXIII The Doctrine of Intention XXIV. and XXV. Roman Catholic Testimonies to the Validity of Anglican Orders. XXVI. The Cases of Certain Anglican Clergy who have joined the Church of Rome. XXVII. Changes made in the English Ordinal in 1662. XXVIII. Concluding Remarks and Summary of the Author's argument.

ADDITIONAL NOTES.

Tables of Consecration: I. Archbishop Parker.
II. Archbishop Laud. III. Archbishop Juxon.
APPENDICES.-I. Authoritative statements regarding
Ordination officially published in 1537 and 1543.
II. An Act concerning the Consecration of a Bishop
made in 25th year of Henry VIII. Cap. xx. sec. 5.
III. Statutes relating to the Consecration of Bishops
under Edward VI.

IV. Act 3 Edward VI. to draw up a New Ordinal.
V. Act to annex the Ordinal to the Prayer Book.
VI. Act 1 of Mary to repeal the preceding Acts.
VII. Act 1 of Elizabeth to re-establish the Book of

Common Prayer.

VIII. Act declaring the legality of the Ordinations. XI. The Thirty-Nine Articles on Ordination.

X. Documents relating to the Consecration of Barlow and Hodgkins.

XI. Documents relating to Scory and Coverdale.
XII. Documents relating to the Consecration of
Parker.

XIII. Parker's Book, De Antiquitate Britannica
Ecclesiæ.

XIV. Henry Machyn's Diary, with testimonies regarding the same.

XV. Breve of Pope Julius III. to Cardinal Pole.
XVI. Dr. Lingard on Parker's Consecration.
XVII. Documents relating to the Consecration of
Horn

XVIII. The Nonjuring Consecrations. Bishop Hickes'
Records.

XIX. Documents concerning the Case of Bishop Gordon of Galloway.

XX. Dr. Newman's Letters on Anglican Orders and replies to the same.

XXI. Certain Comments on Roman Catholic statements. The Charges of Forgery.

XXII. Letters of Orders of various Communions. General Index.

London: J. T. HAYES, Lyall-place, Eaton-square.

THE

JUST PUBLISHED,

SARUM HYMNAL:

WITH PROPER TUNES. Cloth boards, red edges, gilt lettering, 5s.; by post 5s. 6d. The Music Edited by THEODORE EDWARD AYLWARD. Dedicated by permission to

THE RIGHT REV. WALTER KERR, Lord Bishop of Salisbury, and Precentor of the Province of Canterbury.

Parts I., II, and III., price 1s. each, per post 18. 2d each.

Part IV., 28.; per post, 2s. 3d. each.
A Large Type Edition with the Treble only, for
Choirs, &c. Price 28.

THE SARUM HY M NA L,
Square 32mo., Cloth Limp, 6d., Cloth Boards, 8d.
Fine Toned Paper Edition, cloth gilt, red
edges, 18.; roan, 1s. 3d.

A Large Type Edition, Square 16mo., cloth, 1s. 2d. cloth boards, 18. 8d.

Clergymen sending Post-office Order to Brown and Co. can bave 100 copies of Sixpenny Edition at the rate of 4d. per copy; and the Large Type Edition one dozen for 11s. and 148. respectively.

Salisbury: BROWN & CO., and W. P. AYLWARD. London: SIMPKIN, MARSHALL & Co., & METZLER & Co.

IMPORTANT BOOK ON LONDON ASYLUMS, CHARITIES, &c.

In preparation, crown 8vo., price 7s. 6d. (Uniform with "The Seven Curses of London," by "The Amateur Casual.")

A

NEW WORK BY MR. ARCHER, Author of "Strange Work," "The Pauper, the Thief, and the Convict," &c.; giving an Account of Personal Visits to Asylums, Charitable Institutions, and Friendly Agencies for the Relief of Distress in the Metropolis, with inquiries into their Organisation and Intention, their failures and Successes, their Fallacies and Realities. London: STANLEY RIVERS and CO., Publishers, 8, Palsgrave-place, Strand.

NEW WORK

BY THE REV. PREBENDARY JACKSON.

URIOSITIES of the PULPIT and

PULPIT LITERATURE: Memorabilia, Anecdotes, &c., of Celebrated Preachers, from the Fourth Century of the Christian Era to the Present Time. By THOMAS JACKSON, M.A., Prebendary of St. Paul's Cathedral, and Rector of Stoke Newington, London. Price 58, in the new black and gold binding, gilt top.

DAILY NEWS.-"One of those agreeable books of gossip and literary information which every body reads, and must read with pleasure."

IRISH ECCLESIASTICAL GAZETTE.—“ To the preacher, as well as the hearer, of sermons, few books, can prove more amusing and instructive. We recommend this work to our readers, who will find in it an ple food for thought and reflection, with many useful and practical examples from popular preachers as to the best method of catching and retaining the attention of a congregation."

OBSERVER." There is a great deal of interesting matter in this volume.'

OXFORD UNIVERSITY HERALD.-" This is a very valuable work, containing an immense amount of information, conveyed in the most attractive form. We can recommend it as being both instructive and interesting, and also as being a very desirable addition to the ecclesiastical literature of the present day." OXFORD TIMES." It is a very interesting work, and one likely to prove specially useful to the preachers of We are glad to see that the writer proposes to publish a second series, should the present volume be favourably received by the public-of which there can be but little doubt."

sermons. .

LONDON SOCIETY.-"One of the most interesting books of the kind we have ever seen. Clerics may read it, and it is to be hoped they will, for it is calculated to do them much good; but the general reader will find it a delightful book, useful to take up at an odd halfhour, useful also for constant reference."

GARDENER'S CHRONICLE." It will be understood that an erudite Clergyman, deeply interested in preach

TONY STRATFORD.-ST. PAUL'S ing, as one of the principal labours of his own life,

STONY

SCHOOL.

Visitor.-The LORD BISHOP of OXFORD.
Warden.-Rev. W. T. SANKEY, Vicar.

With Graduate Masters. The terms at this school are inclusive, and there are Exhibitions tenable at School and College. Apply to the Rev. Warden, Vicarage; or the Secretary, St. Paul's School.

would, in a large treatment of this subject, produce an interesting book. Assuredly Mr. Jackson has done so." DAILY TELEGRAPII.-"For the general reader, the pace and the information acquired are just about what he likes."

ILLUSTRATED TIMES.-"We can only say that if the Rev. Prebendary Jackson's sermons at Stoke Newington, where he is Rector, are as broad and sensible as

ONDON FREE and OPEN CHURCH his book, his parishioners must be as fortunate people

[ocr errors]

ASSOCIATION.

OFFICE:-25, NORFOLK STREET, STRAND, W.C. President:-The Right Honourable Lord Wharncliffe. Treasurer:-Octavius L. Hills, Esq., 4, Douro Place, Kensington, W. (To whom all Cheques and Post-office Orders should be made payable.) Resident Secretary:-R. Townshend Mayer, Esq.. F.R S.L, 25, Norfolk-street, Strand, W.C. (To whom all communications should be addressed). Bankers:-Union Bank of London, 95, Chancery-lane, W.C. EXECUTIVE COUNCIL.

Rev. J. G. H. Hall, M.A.
R. H. Major, Esq., F.SA.,
F.R S.L.

Rev. Jordan Palmer, M.A.,
F.S.A.
Major-General Chase Parr.
Geo. Edmund Street, Esq.,

A.R.A.

Robert Alderson Turner, Esq.

Edward J. Athawes, Esq.
Rev. George Barnes, M.A.
Alan C. Bellamy, Esq.
Professor Bentley, F.S.L.
H. Trelawny Boodle, Esq.
S. Bishop Blunt, Esq.
Mr. Samuel Brighty.
George H. Brooks, Esq.
Alfred Buckley, Esq.
Donald M. Dewar, Esq.
Captain M Drake, R.E.
C. J. Eyre, Esq.
Henry J. Fielding, Esq.
Mr. James Golding.
Henry G. Hayter, Esq.
Alfred Heales, Esq., F.S.A.
Persons desirous of abolishing the Pew System, and
its attendant evils, are earnestly requested to support
this Association.

Rev. W. Wallace, M.A. Dr. Martindale Ward. Rev. G. Crosby White, M.A. Wm. White, Esq., F.S.A. Henry Wood, Esq.

Tracts are published by the Council, and may be obtained at a nominal cost. It is earnestly requested that friends of this Missionary work will provide themselves with an assortment of these Tracts for distribution among the Clergy and Laity.

FUNDS ARE URGENTY REQUIRED.

[blocks in formation]

as his readers. Curiosities of the Pulpit is at once good and amusing. Most honestly is this book to be recommended."

NEWS OF THE WORLD.-"Collections of personal and characteristic anecdotes are always interesting: and the volume before us will, in that respect, engage as much attention as any work of its class. But the author has a higher purpose than that of affording amusement. . and has accomplished it with good

taste and judgment." MORNING ADVERTISER.-"A volume of much interest to thoughtful readers. The Curiosities of Pulpit Literature are learnedly, as well as amusingly, illustrated."

[ocr errors]

CAMBRIDGE CHRONICLE AND UNIVERSITY JOURNAL. "This is a charming book; very amusing, and full of suggestive thoughts. We heartily wish Mr. Jackson the success which he here deserves. The book is well got up: handsomely bound, and well printed, with a good index."

ATHENEUM.-"A goodly collection of anecdotes, which illustrate Church and Church-goers, including chapel, conventicle, people, and preachers; interspersed with samples of sermons, from which many a young hand may take an idea."

BLACKWOOD'S MAGAZINE.-"A readable book." YORKSHIRE GAZETEE." One of the most interesting publications that has recently fallen under our notice. The book affords a fund of amusement and instruction." LEICESTER JOURNAL.-"This is a work by a profound and meditative thinker. In an introductory chapter, written in a clear, vigorous style, we have some admirable remarks upon the true influence of the pulpit. It will suit the taste of those who fly to reading as a recreation as well as those who make books their study, in search of originality of thought, and earnest, practical spirit."

EDDOWES'S SHREWSBURY JOURNAL.-" The author displays marvellous tact and taste. His range of reading is simply astonishing; and its fruits are here presented in a most readable, interesting, and instructive form."

BANBURY ADVERTISER.-"This is a work which must command success: for truly, pre-eminently does it deserve it. We know of no other volume where, in the same compass, a like amount of interesting information connected with pulpit anecdotes, pulpit eloquence, and pulpit literature, is given in so pleasing and instructive a form."

London: JAMES HOGG and SON, York-street Covent-garden, W.C.

London: Published by JOHN HOGG, 14, York Street, Covent Garden, and Printed by JOHN HIGGS BATTY, 6, Red Lion Cour Fleet Stree

The

Church Herald.

No. 5.—Vol. I.

REGISTERED FOR TRANSMISSION ABROAD.

WEDNESDAY, Nov. 17, 1869.

DR. TEMPLE ELECTED.

THE prophecies of the newspaper-prophets have signally come to nothing. Only six men-may God bless them, and may the faithful have their names long in remembrance as good men and true! only six men were found to stand up in defence of the truths of Christianity in opposition to the principle of Essays and Reviews. The projector and Editor of that volume, which has been solemnly condemned by Convocation, is now Bishop-elect of Exeter. He is so by the power of the Crown, by the grace and good-will of Mr. Gladstone, and by the formal and solemn election by a large majority of the Exeter Chapter. Let it not be said henceforth that the State made him Bishop. State authorities nominated him, but Churchmen-to their deep shame and disgrace-elected him, and, therefore, we do earnestly trust that both now and in the future the saddle may be put on the right horse. Those Clergy, who are so ready to sacrifice all principle are ever abusing and maligning the State, in order to mislead public opinion from contemplating their own obvious shortcomings. They loudly blame the State when they ought to blame other people.

Had the timid and abject creatures who absented themselves from the Chapter meeting last Thursday-poor tools with weak consciences and feeble bodily health-gone and done their duty, in face of the World, the Devil and the Liberals, the moral effect of the opposition would have been much greater than it has been. As it is the principles of Essays and Reviews is now an influential part of the Anglican tradition. The Westminster Review accurately wrote that the teaching of that volume is now as much a portion of the doctrine of the Church of England as Mr. Liddon's doctrine or Mr. Carter's. In fact, more so; for we question whether any Anglican Bishop would stand sponsor to all that Mr. Liddon and Mr. Carter have written, whereas we know that the Lord Bishop-elect of Exeter is the patron, defender and coadjutor of the Anti-Christian Essayists.

This state of affairs is brought about by the blessed and benificent action of Mr. Gladstone-who thus punishes the Clergy for having so properly kicked him out of Oxford-and by the Liberal and Whig Parsons of the Exeter Chapter. Poor Dr. Pusey, the Vice-President of the E.C.U., and hitherto the political agent of Mr. Gladstone in the University of Oxford, is a little shocked and uses strong language; but he has been shocked so often, and has used strong language so frequently, that men have come to see that it is all froth and noise, or as Shakespeare has it, "full of sound and fury signifying nothing." He has cried "Wolf!" so often that now nobody attends to him.

Of the conduct of the E.C.U. we have already expressed our opinion. That opinion, we rejoice to learn, has not been thrown away upon many of its members. We have received a large pile of letters thanking us for our advocacy of principle in preference to party. And we learn that the policy which that organization has been induced to adopt in the Temple case, by a small but resolute clique-in the teeth of an opposition (well represented on the Council, and backed up by the

Price 2d.

strongest expostulations from more than forty Branches)-may not improbably be the cause of a disruption of the whole body. Even the blowers of the penny trumpets of Ritualism admit that 600 members have recently retired, and in this number are not reckoned those who have paid their subscriptions to the end of the year and remain nominal members only until that period. So that we may heartily congratulate our readers on the fact that some men of principle still energize, who refuse to be pinned to the coat and cassock tails of Mr. Gladstone's clever allies in Burleigh-street, in order mechanically to register their wills and obsequiously do their bidding. What may further happen in re Dr. Temple we cannot at present set forth. That his Confirmation, Consecration, and Installation will each be met by vigorous protests from men of position and principle is quite determined on. For no truehearted member of the Church of England can contemplate the fact of his wielding the Bishop's staff in the West of England without sorrow, alarm and dismay. Still further, the filling up of Pastoral vacancies by Ritualistic sceptics and Broad Church prigs of the Arnold and Jowett school-which is certain to be his policy-is not a pleasant picture for men. to contemplate who heartily believe in the dogma of the Incarnation, and who detest with a cordial detestation the bumptious pride and patronizing condescension of cold-blooded Infidels very thinly varnished with a coating of mere Christian sentiment.

[ocr errors]

DIOCESAN ORGANIZATION.

Ar last, however reluctantly, the majority of Churchmen appear to be convinced by recent events that critical times are in store for the Church and State of England. Seldom indeed have more startlingly ominous shadows been cast before. The long apathy which succeeded the abnormal excitement of the Reformation and Rebellion periods, has in its turn been followed in the present century by a reaction of energy; and some of the bitterest fruits of that energy we have still to taste. It was pleasanter, and consequently more popular, till of late, to paint the prospect before us with an imaginary couleur de rose; Convocation was revived, and the Church, it was said, was secure in the affections of the people;" the innate Conservatism of the nation so averse to rapid change would at any rate postpone any disagreeable revolution till after our time; not a few secretly cared little if then should come the deluge. But men's eyes are now considerably opened, and a very general feeling of discomfort has arisen, not unmixed with bewildered alarm. Twelve months have sufficed to abolish half of the Church Establishment, and not only so, but very effectually to rob her. The statesman who was to fill the Episcopal bench with High Churchmen, and whom the Guardian and its followers have not unsuccessfully laboured to encircle with a halo of Anglo-Catholic sanctity, has not only accomplished this predatory feat, but in the exercise of his patronage has applied to a very unexpected and unsavoury quarter.

To such a pass indeed have events come, that we have very nearly witnessed the fulfilment of the prophecy that the lion and the lamb should lie down together; Dr. Pusey and Lord

Shaftesbury have almost fraternized; Archdeacon Denison and this great meeting, though professedly of small account, is not Dean Close have narrowly escaped an embrace. Little, how-confined to the country in which it will take place, nor to the ever, would it matter that men realized the inevitable future, religious community for whose special edification it is conif they were only prepared to shape their actions accordingly vened, but extends in a greater or less degree to all the Great -forearmed as well as forewarned. But the false peace in Powers of Europe, and especially to those which, as nations, which we have so long indulged has rusted our weapons and still profess and cherish the Roman Catholic faith. deadened our energies. We stand before an inferior enemy, disorganized, without a leader, panic-stricken, unready.

The time before us is evidently short; but it is enough if God's good Providence should grant decision and resolution to those who value their inheritance and love their country. The obvious course to take in order first to oppose an at all effective resistance to the destructives, and secondly, should that fail, to prevent an utter collapse and dissolution of the Church, is to unite. The obvious way to promote union in our own ranks is to utilize and extend the existing machinery of our system; and foremost in that machinery most thoughtful men agree in placing the Diocesan scheme with its capitular and parochial ramifications.

If Church Conferences have done no other good, they have at least indisputably shown the advantage of bringing men of opposed sentiments and different schools together; they have shown that there are most important matters on which it is possible to produce almost unanimity: that prominent men on one side are not necessarily so black as the other was wont to paint them; that Clergymen are not all narrow-minded, nor Laymen unecclesiastical. The indirect impulse which has thus been given to regular synodical action is invaluable. For too long a time a tendency to isolation has prevailed; each country parish would be an imperium in imperio; each Priest his own Bishop; and the Laity left out in the cold. Such a state of things if continued must rapidly extinguish sympathy, and eventually life itself.

Many Dioceses, however, have set an example well-deserving of imitation: Ely, Gloucester, Oxford, Lichfield, and others are bestirring themselves to do the Church's work in the Church's ways; and it is this that we would urge upon the attention of all who seriously regard the eventful future.

As was well pointed out recently by a contemporary, the interest of the Laity, that is the people, must be at once engaged and directed. At present it is too generally undefined and often captious; freely welcomed to a share in the work which is for their benefit, taught for what aims they must contend, their co-operation will freely be given, and the common strength proportionately augmented. Where no steps have yet been taken in this direction it should be an immediate object to revive in each Parish, each Deanery, each Diocese, duly organized assemblies to represent in their respective stations all members of the ecclesiastical body. Experience proves it to be the natural remedy for existing weakness, and History teaches that it is the right one. Common deliberation supplies a necessary outlet for unfounded jealousies and real grievances, and sows the seed of much wanted charity, and common work involves united power.

THE COMING ROMAN COUNCIL.
[COMMUNICATED.]

THE 8th of December, 1869, will be not only a day of universal excitement and interest to the four continents of the world, but a mark for future historians who will look back, generations hence, to this date in writing the history of the nineteenth century. On that day the Pope will gather round him a vast assembly of Bishops and theologians with whom in solemn conclave he will proceed to discuss the present position of affairs in the Roman Catholic Church, and possibly to promulgate some novel dogma henceforth to be regarded among themselves and throughout their own Communion as de fide. The political importance of

In confirmation of this it is striking to remark at the outset with what extreme caution, if not coldness, the coming Council is contemplated by the Government of those countries which may be supposed to have interest at stake. It has already been announced in certain quarters that, "while not opposing the meeting of the Council, full liberty will be reserved to take such steps as shall be desirable after its deliberations are over; in other words Pius IX. is politely informed that, however grand and imposing a spectacle he may create in the Cathedral of the Great Apostle, however many mitred heads he may congregate within the walls of the Eternal City, the scheme of European re-construction must go on notwithstanding, and individual States must not be lectured, or thwarted in the execution of their pet political projects. In olden days, in those happy times when Rome ruled the roost and had it all her own way, and when sweet harmony between Church and State was the rule and not the exception in Catholic countries, Princes of the blood-royal, Kings, Emperors and small Sovereigns lent the dignity of their presence, and the weight of their influence to these Great Councils of the Roman Church but circumstances have changed all this, and not a crowned head, save he of the triple crown, the Sovereign Pontiff himself, will grace the proceedings of the eventful 8th of December. inclined to think that the present position of affairs in Europe fully justifies this witholding of their persons on the part of those who might otherwise with propriety attend. Austria, Italy, and Spain, not to mention many "lesser lights," are not at present excessively cordial in their political relations with the Court of Rome, and although this is not to be a political Conference, the well-known propensity of that small kingdom to convey practical hints under the cover of every ecclesiastical Latin might render unpleasant, not to say undignified, the official attendance of any of these Powers in the person of their respective rulers.

We are

But it is in their religious aspect that the doings of the Roman Council of 1869 will command the attention of English-speaking people throughout the world. Whatever statistics may prove as to the lax morality of the United Kingdom, Englishmen are undoubtedly a religious people to this extent, that religious questions kindle in them an interest far more keen, an enthusiasm infinitely more genuine than any political or social questions, be they never so important. We have just passed through a period of this kind of excitement, and in such a manner as to prove abundantly, were proof wanting, this trait in our national character. The most sacred feelings of loyal Churchmen have been grossly insulted, their tempers sorely tried, by the temporary triumph of Radical violence, and the consequent dismemberment of a portion of our Established Church; we are, therefore, in a peculiarly fit position to sympathize with any fellow-Christians who are in danger of suffering from despotic rule, and none the less so if that despotism threatens to take the form of enthralling the conscience by enforcing the belief of new superstitious fables.

It must be known to most of our readers-and we take this opportunity of informing the ignorant-that the avowed object of this Council is to make a "matter of faith," that is, to be believed under pain of damnation, the Ultramontane doctrine of Papal Infallibility, a doctrine hitherto confined to over-zealous 'verts and super-ignorant rustic Priests. The former class will be ably represented by Dr. Manning, the R.C. Archbishop of Westminster, whose powerful eloquence and insinuating rhetoric will alike be devoted to overcoming

the tender scruples of his brother Bishops, few of whom it is expected will have sufficient courage of their opinions to oppose the polished Latin orations of one of the most finished classical scholars now living. The success or failure of the attempt will, however, greatly depend on the amount of Liberty of Speech permitted to the representatives of the several parties in the Church. If such men as Dollinger, Kettler, and the Archbishop of Paris, are to be muzzled or gagged, then the utterances of the Council, howsoever pleasing to the Ultramontanes, will carry no weight whatever with men of impartial mind, gifted with ordinary reasoning-faculties and an honest love of fair play. For it must be distinctly remembered that this Council is in no sense Ecumenical like the generally-accepted General Councils of the Church, and therefore is deprived of that authority and respect which, as such, it might fairly claim. In surmising how much freedom of deliberation will be allowed to moderate men, we are not much gratified when we read in Le Monde, the Parisian Ultramontane organ, that "The Philosophical Sects are always seeking truth: the Church declares it, and does not put it in discussion." Exactly so! Gallileo 'sought and found truth in the starry firmament," and "the Church" infallibly pronounced him a sorcerer, and denied his truth. But further, if the Roman Church, rejoicing in its universal knowledge of truth, is above seeking or discussing it, it does seem somewhat superfluous to summon many hundred Bishops from all parts of the world simply to "declare" what is as old as the Church itself, that which, according to this lofty argument, must have been known and accepted as true by every Catholic Bishop from the days of St. Peter till now. That is one horn of the dilemma; the other remains, and it is this-If the personal infallibility of the Pope has not been hitherto known and received, how have the Roman Catholics discovered it without "seeking," and how will they be able to enforce it on the enlightened members of their body, who know it to have been born in ambition and nurtured in superstition, without "discussing" it? Bacon says that "the enquiry of truth is the sovereign good of human nature,' and many who sit in the Council will agree with him: but that great Philosopher addressed himself to ordinary mortals striving after truth, and not to Saints perfected who simply declare it; so that in the present instance his words will probably not carry much weight. But this point of personal infallibility, though the most important, is only one among many which will test the power and influence of that great school of moderate men within the Church of Rome who are now beginning to see, what Englishmen and others saw three hundred years ago, that their Church is not everything which she ought to be, not immaculate, not infallible. Men such as Hyacinthe and Ffoulkes are honest men, who, seeing error in the bosom of their own fold, are not ashamed or frightened to point it out. They are not isolated individuals, but representatives of an extensive party; and their appearance on the horizon at the present moment is the healthy sign of a new era which is dawning slowly but surely, when superstition shall give way to the onward march of civilization, and Roman intolerance shall be a thing of the past. These will die hard, but they will die none the less.

Reviews of Books.

[ocr errors]

Pulpit Literature: Memorabilia, Anecdotes, etc., of Celebrated Preachers, from the Fourth Century of the Christian Era to the Present Time, (James Hogg and Son)-is nearly all that is necessary to a description of its contents; and of the manner of presenting them it may be said that it is judicious, practical, earnest, and in good taste. The volume is handsomely put forth by the publishers, and an elaborate engraving of the new pulpit in the author's Church of St. Mary, Stoke Newington, adorns the title-page. As to the object of the volume, beside the interest and improvement of the general reader, it is to present to the preachers of to-day examples from the whole range of pulpit literature, both of failures and successes, which may serve respectively as representative evils to be avoided and excellencies to be imitated. Biographical sketches of various preachers from the fourth century to the nineteenth are made to alternate with frequent extracts from their Sermons. The peculiarities of the ancient preachers-the vivid illustrations of current life that marked St. Chrysostom; the soft and delicious eloquence of St. Basil; and the terse and argumentative style of St. Augustine, are either noted or illustrated. Afterwards, and in greater detail, the author proceeds to describe and to exemplify the quaintness, the directness, and the vividness of the mediaval preachers, who, in the words of Mr. Baring-Gould, "did not make long extracts, but with one light sweep brushed up a whole bright string of sparkling Scripture instances." Then follow anecdotes and reminiscences of celebrated French, Spanish, German, and other foreign preachers since the era of the Reformation, with specimens of their piquancy, tact, faithfulness, zeal, grotesqueness, and impertinence. The great French preachers of the 17th and 18th centuries are in possession of an exclusive chapter, and examples of the style of Bourdaloue, Bossuet, and Massillon are placed before the reader, whilst to move them half-a-dozen of smaller reputation, short biographies are accorded. Nor are the grand masters of the British pulpit forgotten. The devices of American back-woods Evangelists, in order to arrest the attention of their uncouth audiences, form a most striking and amusing portion of "The Curiosities of the Pulpit.' The remarks of the author throughout the volume are made with tact, good-feeling, and discrimination, and give all along a conviction that he is speaking of what he knows and understands; and they add much to the charm of a volume which is as pleasant and engrossing as it is full and suggestive.

Dr. Lee, true to his well-known sound principle that Conservatism and Catholicity should go hand in hand, publishes his Sermon preached on the Twelfth Anniversary of the A.P.U.C. He entitles it The "Sour Grapes" of Disunion, (Hayes) and embodies in it an expression of the principle in question in the following practical passage. All Reunionists should obtain and preserve this Sermon:

No one can doubt that, as regards the restoration of visible unity, there are many obvious dangers to be met and overcome. To contemplate the work apart from prayer might appal the most sanguine. For ourselves, members of the school of thought mainly labouring by co-operation for too, the present difficulties are neither few nor small. Even amongst the blessed result in question, there are dangerous divisions, the hurtful activity of local cliques, and an unattractive and unblessed isolation. As regards our Association itself, there has been of late, strange to say, an unaccountable want of interest in its object, and an inexplicable apathy on the part of some of its members-all the more strange when the evils of an open rupture between Church and State in England, if not imminent, are in the minds of thousands. For such a rupture would bring In the face of the widespread and unflagging interest mani- certain perplexity and complicate existing confusion. An order and fested in the kind of literature which is conversant about state of things which has been from the days of St. Austin, England's own Apostle, could not be evidently changed without momentous danger. preachers and pulpit characteristics, it would be hard indeed Many, for example, believe that the three parties into which the National to believe that the influence of the pulpit is on the wane; and Church is more or less divided would speedily separate, either from the we are glad to find that a parochial Clergyman of Prebendary other, when such a change took place. How long the principle of conJackson's authority and experience takes up so strong a posi-union amongst those who are constantly learning by experience that tinually affirming ecclesiastical negations would suffice for a bond of tion against the theory that the art of preaching has declined. Protestantism is but undeveloped infidelity, could hardly be predicated. The title of his work before us- -Curiosities of the Pulpit and Again, what religion, if any, that school would adopt, which with pro

fuse professions of breadth and liberality is notoriously quite as illiberal as the Protestant section, no chastened imagination could conceive. Here, then, are dangers dark and multiform. If such a separation came, in some probability many would be compelled to act singly, and without co-operation. I am free to confess that present difficulties, augmented by such future complications, would, in my humble judgment, tend more than anything else to advance the policy of individual secession to other parts of Christ's family rather than that less selfish one of a corporate reunion amongst its separated parts. For these, and other reasons, I pray daily that Church and State may not be rent in twain.

I have been a subscriber to those successive ventures in the weekly newspaper press, which have started with a greater or less perception of the unquestionable truth that the Tory in politics and High Churchman in religion build upon the same identical foundation, and that the only hope for either of them lies in their mutual acknowledgment of the fact. There was the old Union, tolerably true to this principle from the beginning to the end, and which died of the usual policy of High Churchmen, of finding all possible fault with those who support them from without, with the more or less conscious notion of making capital among their enemies by so doing. That paper was thrown over as a tub to the whale. Then there was the Church and State Review, a most excellent paper in all respects, which, however, vanished all at once in a We confess ourselves much disappointed with Dr. Weninger's manner characteristic of its original editor, announcing that its printreatise just published On the Apostolical and Infallible ciples could no longer be defended, and then the Church News, a paper Authority of the Pope (New York: Sadleir). Neither in its with much deeper comprehension of the true principle than the Union, historical, philosophical, nor theological aspect has the subject with a more ignominious fate. It was purchased by its enemies, and as but which came to grief from the same cause as that paper, and met been treated with any originality or ability. The same hack- it is paraded on the walls as still a Tory newspaper it is to be presumed that quotations from Scripture and the Fathers, the same exagge- some one is enacting the same part which Defoe is now said to have perrated commentary on certain passages from early conciliar formed in the newspaper press of his day. But I doubt whether either of decisions, are given here as are to be found in almost every such bold, outspoken frankness in facing all the results of the position as them, to say nothing of others, which might be mentioned, ever showed treatise on the subject which has been written since the dis- yourself. I can only say I wish you very heartily success. If I mistake cussion on the Four Articles. Moreover, every historical diffi- not, you take a line more favourable to Ritualism in the abstract than culty which stands in the way of the well known Ultramontane our old friend the John Bull, and I hope you do. Ritualism is the theory is either wholly ignored or cleverly slurred over. No proper and characteristic language of the objective truth for which you contend, and there is no Ritualism in any London Church which is at all man in his senses, with the page of history outspread before in excess of what is good for the souls of men; but you are quite right him, could maintain for a moment that the personal Infalli- also in exposing the weaknesses of the Ritualistic party, who are in bility of the Pope has been a dogma even of the Roman Catholic danger unless they meet with some plain-spoken correctives from their Church; much less of the Church Universal. The Jesuits friends of dwindling into as feeble and helpless a combination as ever were borne upon the revolutionary tide, screaming their cries of victory have cleverly ventilated this subject, and have obtained theoas they pass down the rapids to destruction. We can by no means spare logical partizans on behalf of their pet theories in many parts them, Sir. The Church is the salt of the objective party, and they with of the world-in Revolutionary America as well as in old- all their activity and all their goodness, are the salt of the Church, but fashioned England: but these theories can never hold water. something must be done to warn them of the fatal consequences of that alliance with Revolutionists which they seem to court, or we shall all They cannot stand. They are not true. They will not work. sink together. I am, Sir, yours faithfully, A mere handful of converts from the Church of England, who Cuckfield Vicarage. T. ASTLEY MABERLEY. promise well to make the communion of their adoption ridiculous in the eyes of the learned, are moving heaven and earth to get their follies authorized and approved by authority. But they will fail. The proposition of Dr. Weninger is opposed to Scripture, to the Fathers, to Catholic tradition, to the decrees of the Councils, and to the general belief of the faithful everywhere, and at all times. Therefore we reject it.

66

[ocr errors]

The Monthly Packet (Mozley) for November contains the usual amount of entertaining matter. The somewhat prosy Musings over the Christian Year and Lyra Innocentium,' are followed by a spirited "Cameo from English History," treating of the Wars of the Houses of York and Lancaster. Three interesting tales progress satisfactorily. There is a good account of the opening of Inverness Cathedral, and the usual Correspondence, and Hints on Reading. The original piece of poetry-" All Saints' Day"-though evincing a tender and religious spirit, lacks vigour and poetic ring.

We can strongly recommend The Liturgy of the Church of England; with Devotions for those who Assist thereat, whether as Hearers or Communicants (Hayes), which is thoroughly Catholic in tone, and contains excellent devotions, well and simply arranged. It is convenient in size, and from the largeness of its print will be found an admirable book for the use of unlettered or aged people.

Correspondence.

OUR PRINCIPLES AND POLICY. SIR,-Allow me to thank you much for your paper. Your words are rough but they are true, and if they were not somewhat rougher than a pure taste might desire they would simply not be read. It is no doubt a great pity that quiet, peaceful exposition of principles is out of the case in newspapers, and that through newspapers that the vast majority of people, educated or uneducated, are reached. Yet since so it is, wise men will acquiesce in the inevitable avowed complaint and endure as best they may the conditions under which alone principles can be made to penetrate the masses.

THE ENGLISH CHURCH UNION.
SIR, Mr. Murray himself gives us the best proof that only perse-
verance is required for Conservatives to carry out their objects in the
take action directly opposed to Mr. Gladstone in the University Tests
E.C.U., when he admits that we succeeded in compelling that body to
Bill. It certainly requires persistence and determination on our part, but
we generally succeed in the end, while Radicals have never yet brought it
into direct collision with the Tory party. I am glad to say that in the
Temple business we have another case in point. In common with
many others I have sent an indignant protest against the former resolu-
tion of the Council, and I find that it has now been determined at a
Council meeting last Friday to memorialize the Archbishop against Dr.
Temple's Consecration, and to call on all Chairmen of Branches to
summon meetings to authorize them to sign this memorial on the part
of their Branches. I can well imagine the chorus of indignation with
which Dr. Littledale and other Radical members will receive this news,
but it is a great victory, for all who uphold the liberty of the Church
E.C.U. being Mr. Gladstone's most obedient servant. I only regret that
and purity of faith. After this I trust we shall hear no more of the

so many sound Churchmen seceded from it-as I cannot but think-
with undue hastiness.
Yours faithfully,
Bovey Tracey, Nov. 13th.

EDWARD W. URQUHART.

regard to the E.C.U.:-The English Church Union defended the
SIR, A certain Mr. Pixell recently made the following statement with
doctrine and discipline of the Church of England, in points essential and
points less essential. If either the doctrine or the Ritual of the Church
was attacked, then the Union was up in defence. The time had come
when the pure Catholic doctrines of the Church must be maintained,
and the charge brought against the Union of merely defending Ritualism
could not be sustained against its members. He had heard it said that
they were a political society-first a Radical and then a Tory society. He
would leave it to those who so accused the Society to fight it out amongst
them. The Society was neither the one nor the other. If any measure
was introduced into Parliament by whatever party, if it seemed a
measure likely to benefit the Church, why the Society defended it to the
best in their power; but if, on the contrary, it appeared to be a measure
calculated to injure the Church, why they opposed it at every stage. The
Union was neither a Tory nor a Radical society, but simply a true
Church society. All people, whether Tory or Radical, who were good
Churchmen and communicants, could join the Union."

Anything more unblushing in the character of his remarks and fictions
I never read. With the Temple case before us, I am at a loss to com-
prehend how a Clergyman can dare to make such statements.
Yours obediently,
M. P. C.
Chippenham, November 14th, 1869.

« PreviousContinue »