Reports of Cases Determined in the Supreme Court of the State of CaliforniaBancroft-Whitney, 1969 - Law reports, digests, etc |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 76
Page 162
... question ? " The Witness : Do you want me to explain what my theory was ? " Mr. Zaitzow : Just a moment— " The Court : Read the question . ( Record read . ) " Mr. Zaitzow : It was- " The Court : The question hadn't been concluded . It ...
... question ? " The Witness : Do you want me to explain what my theory was ? " Mr. Zaitzow : Just a moment— " The Court : Read the question . ( Record read . ) " Mr. Zaitzow : It was- " The Court : The question hadn't been concluded . It ...
Page 670
... question [ penalty ] reaches you ? A. Yes . " Juror Allis . " Q. Any feeling , if that question of penalty is submitted to you , any feeling that one is to be preferred over the other ? A. ( Juror indicates negatively . ) Q. One is more ...
... question [ penalty ] reaches you ? A. Yes . " Juror Allis . " Q. Any feeling , if that question of penalty is submitted to you , any feeling that one is to be preferred over the other ? A. ( Juror indicates negatively . ) Q. One is more ...
Page 671
... question of penalty is ever submitted to you , that one penalty is more appropriate than the other ? A. No , sir . " Juror Hall . " Q. Do you have any particular feelings , if the question of penalty is ultimately submitted to you , as ...
... question of penalty is ever submitted to you , that one penalty is more appropriate than the other ? A. No , sir . " Juror Hall . " Q. Do you have any particular feelings , if the question of penalty is ultimately submitted to you , as ...
Contents
McDonnell Douglas Corp v Franchise Tax Board 506 | 14 |
Pacific Gas Electric Co v G W Thomas Drayage | 33 |
Baker | 44 |
Copyright | |
17 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
70 Cal.Rptr action admission agreement alleged Amendment Angeles appeal application arrest Attorney Attorneys at Law Bernstein Board Cal.App California cause charged City Code section committed Compensation Appeals Board concluded constitutional contract conviction counsel County crime Criminal Law damages death penalty decedent decision defendant defendant's determine discretion effect Emeryville employee Estate exemption extrinsic evidence fact federal filed funds Industrial Acc injury instruction interest involved issue Italics added judgment jurisdiction jurors jury L.Ed Labor lease legislative Legislature liability Loretta Young marijuana ment motion negligence offense offer of proof officers opinion ordinance parties payment Penal Code pension person petitioner plaintiff Portland prior prison procedure proceedings prosecution provides purpose question real property reasonable Respondent robbery rule S.Ct sentence standards statute subd Superior Court supra Supreme Court testified testimony tion trial court trial judge trier of fact United USLC verdict witness Workmen's Compensation Youngblood