What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Other editions - View all
affray afterwards appear asked assault attack attempt attended August Austin authorities believe blood blow called cane caſe cause Change charge circumstances common conduct consequence considered conversation counsel Court crime danger death deceased defendant Dexter discharged duty evidence excusable expected fact father feel felony fired further gentlemen give given Gore ground guilty hand happened head heard homicide honor indictment injury intent judge Jury justice justifiable killing malice manner manslaughter means meet mentioned mind murder nature necessary necessity never observed occasion opinion Parker party passed person pistol present principles prove provocation quarrel question reason received recollect relate rule Selfridge Selfridge's side society standing street struck sudden suppose testimony thing told took trial true turned unlawful violent walk weapon whole wish witnesses wound young
Page 28 - England, that no man is to be brought into jeopardy of his life more than once for the same offence.
Page 2 - Co. of the said district, have deposited in this office the title of a book, the right whereof they claim as proprietors, in the words following, to wit : " Tadeuskund, the Last King of the Lenape. An Historical Tale." In conformity to the Act of the Congress of the United States...
Page 121 - ... for it may be so fierce as not to allow him to yield a step, without manifest danger of his life, or enormous bodily harm ; and then in his defence he may kill his assailant instantly. And this is the doctrine of universal justice, as well as of the municipal law.
Page 143 - Also in many cases where no malice is expressed, the law will imply it : as where a man wilfully poisons another, in such a deliberate act the law presumes malice, though no particular enmity can be proved. And if a man kills another suddenly, without any, or without a considerable provocation, the law implies malice ; for no person, unless of an abandoned heart, would be guilty of such an act upon a slight or no apparent cause.
Page 110 - Thus, if one shoots at A and misses him, but kills B, this is murder, because of the previous felonious intent, which the law transfers from one to the other.
Page 7 - Then the indictment was read, which set forth that the prisoner "not having the fear of God before his eyes, but being moved and seduced by the instigation of the devil...
Page 143 - But if the person so provoked had unfortunately killed the other by beating him in such a manner as showed only an intent to chastise and not to kill him, the law so far considers the provocation of contumelious behaviour as to adjudge it only manslaughter, and not murder.
Page 143 - ... malice. And, if two or more come together to do an unlawful act against the king's peace, of which the probable consequence might be bloodshed, as to beat a man, to commit a riot, or to rob a park : and one of them kills a man ; it is murder in them all, because of the unlawful act, the malitia prcecogitata or evil intended before-hand.
Page 113 - ... exhort him to overcome his prejudices, is like telling a blind man to see. He may be disposed to overcome them, and yet be unable because they are unknown to himself. When prejudice is once known, it is no longer prejudice, it becomes corruption ; but so long as it is not known, the possessor cherishes it without guilt ; he feels indignation for vice, and pays homage to virtue ; and yet does injustice. It is the apprehension that you may thus mistake, that you may call your prejudices principles,...