Page images
PDF
EPUB

fications in detail have been introduced, | promoting the system to a greater extent and various alterations made in the minor than they have hitherto done. Of late I arrangements of the Board, and even in have not had much time to read the newssome matters which may be considered as papers; and I hope my right hon. and of primary importance. I have not of late learned Friend the Attorney General for entered minutely into the details of the Ireland, if he becomes acquainted with education given in these schools; but I what is taking place here now, will not understand that that which was in the first imagine that I treat him with any disreinstance rendered compulsory-namely, spect if I frankly avow that I have not the use of Scripture lessons in all the read that speech of his to which the noble schools-has since from various causes Marquess has alluded; but this I know, been left a good deal to the discretion of because I have had communication with the managers of the different schools, and him on this subject-I know his straightthat, consequently, in many of them where forward and candid disposition and charScripture lessons are not used, there is less acter too well not to be quite sure that he Scripture education given in those schools would not make any statement on my part, than was contemplated by the plan at the in which he was not entirely borne out by original foundation of the Board. I do the language I had held to him. I see on not mean to say, that, where these lessons the opposite side of the House the noble are not used, there is not now given to the Earl the late Lord Lieutenant of Ireland, great bulk of the Roman Catholic popula- and I think he can bear me witness that tion a far more enlightened and a far more some two years ago I expressed to him my scriptural education than they were re- opinion that the time would come when it ceiving, or were likely to receive, if this would be most expedient that a Parliasystem had not been adopted. But va- mentary Committee should be appointed rious modifications have taken place from for the purpose of examining into the time to time; and your Lordships are aware practical working of the system of nathat some time ago considerable objections tional education in Ireland, and that I were raised on religious grounds, on the thought such an investigation, calmly, depart of the Presbyterian body, who held liberately, and fairly conducted, would tend aloof from the system of education in those to remove much of the misapprehension schools with quite as much perseverance and misconception on both sides, and might and determination as, I am sorry to say, a lead to such modifications as would obtain great proportion-though not the whole for the system a more united support. I of the clergy of the United Church of Eng- stated at the same time also, that I was land and Ireland do at the present mo- strongly disposed to submit that question ment. Now, my Lords, the absence of to your Lordships' consideration, and to this co-operation I feel to be a great evil. move for a Committee to inquire into the I feel that it is a great misfortune that the working of this system. And there is national system of education was not from one point which it is exceedingly desirable the first taken up by the clergy of the Es- should be cleared up, and upon which the tablished Church; for sure I am that if it noble Marquess has laid considerable stress had been so taken up, they would by this namely, how far this system, as it at time have obtained throughout Ireland a present exists, is practically a system of great and important—and not an unworthy combined education. It is a great object -influence over the education of the people, now to bring up the youth of Ireland in and over the minds, not only of the Protes- constant and familiar intercourse with those tant but of the Roman Catholic population of different religious persuasions to themof that country. But whilst I regret that selves, and rather to teach them how much the Protestant clergy of the Church of Eng- of common truth there is in which they land have thus stood aloof, I hesitate not might all agree, than to inculcate upon to say that I consider it a matter of the their minds those peculiar points upon greatest importance that we should ascer- which they may happen to differ from one tain whether or not, without departing another. But how far the national system from the original system, it may be pos- is a system of combined education-how sible to introduce into that system, as has far it includes within the limits of its already been done with regard to the Pres-operation Protestants of the Established byterian Church, such modifications as may, perhaps, remove the objections of the clergy, and induce the clergy to co-operate in

Church, Presbyterians, and Roman Catholics, and is yet in its details a system which in each particular school is an ex

clusive system, not of necessity by the rule, | conscientious scruples of those who lead but practically according to the results how far Presbyterian schools, acting on their own principles, and complying with the rules of the Board, are yet practically and exclusively confined to Presbyterians and how far, in the south and west of Ireland, where the great bulk of the population are Roman Catholics, the vast majority of the schools are essentially, and all but exclusively, Roman Catholic, under the management of Roman Catholic patrons and Roman Catholic schoolmasters-and if they are, the great majority of the pupils being Roman Catholics, I do not complain; on the contrary, I think it is quite right that these schools should be under the management of Roman Catholic schoolmasters. I complain of none of those things; but, when we want to look at the working of the system, and the possibility of effecting modifications, I think it is important that we should know, by the inquiries of a Committee, how far the system in all these respects deserves to be called that which it was intended to be, and which it is certainly desirable that it should be, a system practically of combined and united education. These questions are, I think, worthy of inquiry by a Committee, and for that purpose I am of opinion it is very desirable that a Committee should be appointed. I think also that, as a part of their labour, that Committee might fairly and properly enter upon an investigation of any possible modifications of the existing rules, which might remove any portion of the objections which are now raised against the system. And if the result of their inquiries should be, that we found that in the great majority of the schools that which was intended to be a combined system, is practically and in reality an exclusive system-if there be Presbyterian schools here, and Roman Catholic schools there; and if the rules of the Board are such as to render it impossible for a portion of the community to attend those schools, and, in fact, practically to exclude them, I hope it will not be regarded as a thing which would derogate from or diminish the influence of the existing system if we enter upon a calm inquiry how far, under the superintendence of the Board, assistance might not in a certain degree be given even to schools which do not strictly come within the letter of the law laid down by the Board. I do not shrink from the consequence to which the noble Marquess has adverted, that schools which, through the

the population, are now excluded from the advantage of coming under the direct superintendence and control of the Board, would then be admitted to the advantages which are undoubtedly to be derived from the assistance of the Board, without sacrificing their principles, I say, my Lords, I do not see that we should in the slightest respect be violating the principles upon which that Board was originally founded, if, adopting an example which was set us in this country in the first instance, we consented to afford some, perhaps a minor, degree of assistance to schools, be they Protestant or Roman Catholic, which may not come under the strict rules of the Board. And I do not dissent from the conclusion adverted to by the noble Marquess, that if we render assistance to an exclusively Protestant school, for instance, we cannot withhold it from an exclusively Roman Catholic school. In the years 1831 and 1832, when this system was first originated, there existed a different feeling from that which prevails now, which would have rendered any assistance on the part of Government to a school exclusively Roman Catholic a matter of absolute imposibility. I have reason to believe that that feeling is materially weakened in the present day. I believe that the scruples which were then entertained with regard to educating Roman Catholics, as Roman Catholics, have not now the same weight and power over the minds of the people that they had at that time. I believe that the affording Government assistance to a school composed exclusively of Roman Catholics would not now meet with the opposition and with the objections which it would have met with in 1831 and 1832. But I readily admit that if you introduce the principle of affording assistance to a school exclusively Protestant in Ireland, you cannot escape from the other alternative of affording assistance also, under the same rule, to a school exclusively Roman Catholic. Whether it may be possible to combine with the independence of these schools as to their internal management-be they Protestant or Roman Catholic-aid from the national funds, and superintendence by national inspectors, is a matter upon which at this moment I do not desire to pronounce any positive opinion. If you ascertain, on the report of a Committee, that, combined education being the rule, practically exclusive education is the system, then I think it would deserve attention whether you should

not extend the principle still further, and without intending in the slightest degree to withdraw the support given, or the influence exercised by the present Board, extend the benefits of a good education, assisted by the Government, supplied with the best books, and controlled and superintended by the inspection of the Government, to those, whether on one side or on the other, whose feelings, principles, or, if you will, prejudices, prevent them from receiving these advantages under the present system. I say, then, that the Attorney General for Ireland was perfectly justified in stating that I desire, if possible, to overcome the objections of the Protestant clergy to the system at present pursued; that I desire that an investigation should take place into the practical working of that system; into the modifications which from time to time may have been found necessary or judged expedient to make in the regulations of the Board in the course of the last twenty years; and into the still further modifications which, without departing from the principle, might yet be adopted; and he was justified also in saying that I desired, if possible, to obtain the co-operation of the clergy to the present system; and before and above all things that I desired to have the means in Ireland, as far as practicable, of extending to Roman Catholics and to Protestants, under the superintendence of the Board, and by the assistance of the Government and the public, the advantages of a sound moral, literary, and religious education. Further than that, however-further than the expression of an opinion that the appointment of a Committee, fairly chosen, and entering impartially on their task, might tend to remove difficulties and facilitate the advancement of education—neither am I as an individual, nor is the Government of which I am a Member, in the slightest degree pledged; but I am of opinion that an investigation by a Parliamentary Committee is desirable for the purpose of seeing how far modifications may be introduced in the existing system, which may have a tendency, not to diminish the influence of the Board, but to carry out more extensively and more beneficially those great objects which to a considerable extent have already been accomplished, and which it is my wish and earnest desire to see thoroughly and effectually carried out in Ireland.

The MARQUESS of LANSDOWNE said, he would willingly give full credit to the noble Earl for the part which, at a former

part of his career, he had taken in the establishment of the present system of national education in Ireland; and of the working of that system he could speak in terms of the fullest approbation. At that time the difficulties which opposed themselves to the working of any such scheme were almost insuperable; and he had no hesitation in saying that those difficulties would have proved too powerful for it, had it not been for the fortunate occurrence which placed at the head of that system prelates of the two Churches equally distinguished for their enlightened character, their profound knowledge, and their liberality to all men. By them that system had been kept alive; all the rocks and shoals had been successfully avoided; and the great mass of the people of Ireland had been made acquainted with the blessings of an enlightened, instead of, if he might use the word, the ignorant education to which before they had been accustomed. He felt that that system had met, perhaps, not with all the success, but certainly much more success than had ever been anticipated; and the inference he drew was, that the system ought not to be touched, he would not say not at all, but certainly not without the greatest care. They ought not to go into a Committee with any view that the essential foundation of that system ought to be departed from; for in that case he had no hesitation in saying, that their Lordships would find that all their grants, all the efforts which they had made, would be found to have been in vain, and that instead of uniting the whole people under the blessings of a system of common education, they had ended by establishing a system of exclusive education, and alienating each class more and more from the other. He protested against any inquiry being gone into as to the working of the system in any case where the Protestant and Roman Catholic clergymen had not co-operated together in supporting the system. It had been well remarked, that the great success which had attended the system, had resulted, to a great extent, from the efforts of the eminent persons set at its head. Unfortunately, at this moment it had to deplore the loss of one of these most distinguished prelates (the Rev. Dr. Murray) whose life had done honour to that Church with which he had been connected; who, so far as his influence was concerned, opposed the evil influence of others; and who maintained a state of

religious peace and harmony in the country | could not be too strongly urged, seeing the where he was called upon to exercise his end which was desired to be attained was beneficial influence. Much might depend the giving to the poorer classes an educaupon the choice of the person to act in his tion both for time and eternity. Their place, as to how far the same benefits Lordships might recollect that when this might be derived from the same system. subject was brought forward in 1832, he That, therefore, was an additional reason felt it his duty to oppose the introduction for not hastily announcing a disturbance of of the measure, on the ground that he a system which, up to the present moment, thought that no measure ought to be introhe held to be perfectly successful, but duced under a Protestant Government, which might be made more successful; and under a Protestant constitution, for and, at the same time, so far as he was the instruction of the people, that had not concerned, for not drawing from the high for its foundation the teaching of the Scripauthority of the noble Earl any indication tures among the children admitted to its of an intention to substitute, for general schools. He was told at the time that if and common, a separate and independent that course was to be pursued, it would ensystem of education. tirely exclude the Roman Catholic children from those schools; but he knew well that at that period Roman Catholic children, to a large amount, were attending schools conducted upon that system, and he had since learned that Roman Catholic children in large numbers were gladly and anxiously attending them and receiving therein a scriptural education. He could not agree with the noble Earl in the statement he had made as to the success of the national system. He (the Earl of Roden) admitted their books were good, and that some of their schools in the country were good; but he said the great majority of the schools were established on a system of giving an exclusively Roman Catholic education to the people. Would not the noble Marquess allow the large body of the Protestant Church in Ireland to have some conscience on this subject? It was his (the Earl of Roden's) privilege to be acquainted with many of the clergy of Ireland, and to meet them from time to time, and to hear their opinions on this subject, and he was certain their opposition to those schools was dictated by the most conscientious motives. He could not doubt that it would come out in evidence before the Committee to which the noble Earl (the Earl of Derby) had referred, that among the Roman Catholic people of Ireland there was the greatest anxiety to be instructed, and to have their children instructed, in the Scriptures, and that they were only kept from that instruction by the tyranny of the priests. He (the Earl of Roden) himself had been a witness within the last few months of what the feelings of the people in the west of Ireland were on this subject. They evinced the greatest anxiety to be instructed in the Scriptures. He had seen a large population, to the amount of upwards of 10,000, brought out of the Church of Rome, and

The EARL of DESART regretted that the Protestant clergy in Ireland had acted with so great a want of judgment at the first establishment of the system. Their system then was a total withdrawal of themselves from connexion with it; the consequence of which was, that the administration had fallen into the hands of the opposite party. He spoke strongly of this systematic withdrawal, because, from his admiration of the national system, he put a school of his own under it. At first, both the Protestant and Roman Catholic clergymen visited it; but the Protestant clergyman by and by absented himself, and, after a time, the Protestant parents complained that they could not allow their children to attend, on account of the annoyances they were subjected to by the Roman Catholic children. He reminded their Lordships that they disposed of a sum of the public money upon principles which had the effect of excluding a great part of the people of the Church of England from participating in the advantages. He, on that account, did not wonder to find some of the clergy of that Church were of opinion that the people to whom they ministered were hardly used.

The EARL of RODEN said, he might, perhaps, stand alone in the opinion he felt it his duty to give in respect to the subject now under their Lordships' consideration; but he felt that he had a duty to perform, and, whether he stood alone in his opinion or not in the discharge of that duty, he would have the consciousness of doing that which he owed to his country, to himself, and, above all, to the great cause involved in this question. He agreed with the noble Marquess (the Marquess of Clanricarde) that the subject was one of paramount importance. Its importance, indeed,

united to the Church of England. And where had that taken place? It had taken place in the diocese of Dr. M'Hale, an eminent man, possessing great talents, and holding sincere ultramontane opinions. He (the Earl of Roden) trusted the effect of the Committee would be, that in future the Protestant Church would have a share in the public grant; for, was it not monstrous to give a large sum of money to educate Roman Catholics exclusively in the Roman Catholic religion, and to refuse to bestow funds for the exclusive teaching in the schools of children connected with the Protestant Church? The people of England expected that the present Government would uphold the Protestant Church, and he trusted they would not have their feelings disappointed.

LORD MONTEAGLE said, if a Committee was to be appointed on this subject, which he considered might be a prudent course if the Committee were rightly guided, his noble Friend at the head of the Government and the noble Earl who had just sat down would enter upon that inquiry upon principles entirely opposite and irreconcileable. It was satisfactory to him (Lord Monteagle) that the noble Earl at the head of the Government had announced his adhesion to the established system; and it was also another ground of satisfaction to him to remember that one of the best and most conclusive speeches which had been made in defence of this system of education was made in the other House of Parliament by a very near relative of the noble Lord at the head of the Government who had a hereditary claim to defend the national schools of Ireland.

On the other hand, what was the object of the system proposed to be established by the noble Earl who last addressed the House (the Earl of Roden)? It was a strictly scriptural system of education which he recommended, leading, as the noble Earl himself had sought to prove, to an extensive amount of proselytism. It was the very system which the noble Earl (the Earl of Derby) when Secretary for Ireland had condemned. He (Lord Monteagle) thought it was a fit subject for Parliamentary inquiry, whether the principles which had been adopted as the foundation of the system, had been adhered to; and if it had been altered in any respect, what were the effects of the alterations introduced. But he would remind the House, that in every year in which any alteration had taken place in the system, that alteration had

been specifically brought under their Lordships' notice in the annual reports; and up to this time there had never been any sufficient objection raised against it. The subject was, no doubt, encompassed with difficulty. His noble Friend (the Earl of Derby) and himself, when Members of the other House of Parliament, were joint members of a Committee which inquired fully into these schools; many of the matters which had been adverted to in the course of the present discussion were made the subject of investigation at that time. Two heavy folio volumes, containing in the evidence given before that Committee much dull theological rubbish, were printed; but the inquiry had led to no other result whatever. Let it not be supposed that he (Lord Monteagle) was not as anxious as the noble Earl (the Earl of Roden) for the diffusion of the Scriptures to those who were willing to receive them; but he said Parliament had no right, if they professed to give a common education, to interpose at the very threshold objections the result of which must be to prevent the principle of a common education being carried into practical operation. Whatever might be the modifications of which this system of education was susceptible, he prayed their Lordships not to attempt to enforce the doctrines of religion in violation of the principles of charity. The great inducement, which in many cases had led to the withdrawal of the Protestant children from the schools, had been, first, the absence of the Protestant clergyman who disapproved of the schools, or would not extend his countenance to them; and, next, the desire which those very clergymen had of seeing schools established in which the education of Protestants might be conducted separately. If they endeavoured to combine in the same system of instruction schools exclusively Catholic, and others exclusively Protestant, the system of national schools for combined instruction would inevitably fail. If they established schools exclusively Protestant, then, on the showing of his noble Friend opposite (the Earl of Derby) they laid down a principle by which they were bound to establish schools exclusively Catholic. He (Lord Monteagle) would say, frankly and unreservedly, that he would never be a consenting party to placing the general education of the Irish youth exclusively under the dominion of the Irish clergy or of the Irish priesthood: such a course would be an entire violation of all the principles on which this system

« PreviousContinue »