The Questions of Law for the opinion of the Court were : " 1. Was the evidence of one credible witness sufficient to prove the sale libelled in the complaint? "2. On the evidence led, was I entitled to acquit the respondent? The Scots Law Times - Page 1241921Full view - About this book
![](https://books.google.ie/books/content?id=4aYDAAAAQAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=5&edge=curl) | Law reports, digests, etc - 1881 - 740 pages
...requires the complaint to be made before a Justice within six months after the commission of the offence. The questions of law for the opinion of the Court were — 1. Whether the Gasworks Clauses Act, 1871, applies to the appellants' company so as to require them to... | |
![](https://books.google.ie/books/content?id=X5ouAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=5&edge=curl) | Law reports, digests, etc - 1892 - 1432 pages
...the High Court upon a case stated by the Sheriffsubstitute, from which the above narrative is taken. The questions of law for the opinion of the Court were, — " (1) Is it competent for a School Board, in a complaint under the Education (Scotland) Acts, 1872 to 1883,... | |
![](https://books.google.ie/books/content?id=T5kuAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=5&edge=curl) | Law reports, digests, etc - 1898 - 1540 pages
...sustained the objections, found the complaint irrelevant, jr.d dismissed the respondent from the bar." The questions of law for the opinion of the Court were — " (1) Is intent to defraud of the essence of the statutory crime and offence charged in •hi; complaint... | |
![](https://books.google.ie/books/content?id=_Y80AAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=5&edge=curl) | Edward William Cox - Criminal law - 1899 - 856 pages
...that they intended, at the time to catch salmon by means thereof ; and they convicted the appellants. The questions of law for the opinion of the Court were : (1) Whether a " net " is such an instrument as is contemplated by sect. 8 of the Salmon Fishery Act, 1861,... | |
![](https://books.google.ie/books/content?id=9z0QAAAAYAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=5&edge=curl) | Judges - 1899 - 318 pages
...adjudged the appellants to be entitled to deduct one month's wages only from the respondent's claim. The questions of law for the opinion of the Court were : 1. Were the Justices correct in their interpretation of section 140, sub-section 1, as applicable to the... | |
![](https://books.google.ie/books/content?id=hUw0AAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=5&edge=curl) | Great Britain. Magistrates' cases - Justices of the peace - 1911 - 732 pages
...salesmen, and drovers, or to dairymen nsing dogs merely for taking cattle to and from grazing lands. The questions of law for the opinion of the court were : (1) Whether a petty sessional court in England is bound under the Customs and Inland Revenue Act 1878,... | |
![](https://books.google.ie/books/content?id=SVIvAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=5&edge=curl) | Law - 1913 - 550 pages
...necessary and competent, although in Ħi general way evidence on this subject was clearly incompetent. The Questions of Law for the opinion of the Court were : 1. Was I right in allowing parties a proof of their respective averments, and to the claimant a conjunct probation1?... | |
![](https://books.google.ie/books/content?id=UVIvAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=5&edge=curl) | Law reports, digests, etc - 1913 - 1066 pages
...necessary and competent, although in a general way evidence on this subject was clearly incompetent." The questions of law for the opinion of the Court were — " 1. Was I right in allowing parties a proof of their respective averments, and to the claimant a conjunct probation.... | |
![](https://books.google.ie/books/content?id=_FovAAAAIAAJ&printsec=frontcover&img=1&zoom=5&edge=curl) | Law reports, digests, etc - 1896 - 912 pages
...said omnibus did not impede or obstruct the traffic on it, nor endanger or inconvenience any person." The questions of law for the opinion of the Court were — "(1) Is the complaint competent or relevant? (2) Do the facts proved warrant the conviction ? " Argued for... | |
| |