« PreviousContinue »
SAMUEL C. LOVELAND,
PREACHER OF THE DOCTRINE OF UNIVERSAL SALVATION,
REV. JOSEPH LABEREE, PASTOR OF THE CONGREGATIONAL CH UNCH AND SOCIETY
IN JERICO, VERMONT.
Come now, let us reason together, saith the Lord; Though your sins be as scarlet, they shall be as white as snow; though they be red like crimson, they shall be as wool.
WINDSOR, VT. PRINTED FOR THE PUILISHER:
PREFACE BY THE PUBLISHER,
The Letters that fill the following pages, were intended to contain an investigation of the doctrine of endless misery, compared with that of the salvation of the whole human family. The advocates for each belief, engaged to make the sacred scriptures the criterion of judging, the ground of examination, and the impartial decision of the subject. But in the pursuance of our labors, do concessions have been gained on either side. It is, therefore, submitted to the judgment of the candid reader, which side the scripture appears the most to favor, and which appears the most agreeable to reason and christian experieuce, from the arguments and scriptures offered, as the advocates for each sentiment have judged for themselves. The subject is thought to be a serious and important one, embracing the interests of every individual. Our views of the character of our glorious and benevolent Creator, inust have an influence on our moral conduct, and tend to swert. en or embitter life, according as they approxiinale to the light of divine truth, or are foreign from this benignant and salutary principle. Hence the spirit of impartialily and free enquiry should ever be cherished in the human breast. The seat of prepossession and the influence of popular religious tenets, evidently form no sinall barrier to the progress of truth. From a view of past ages, we see they are as likely to be against the truth as in its favor.
In making these remarks, the publisher would not so much as intimate, that the authors of these letters were al. together free from similar embarrassments; for undoubtedly they are as strongly attached to their respective sentiments, as multitudes that have gone before them. And it would not be a matter of surprise, if the believers of each doctrine, aster reading these letters, should have a very unfavourable opinion of the one, who advocated the faith opposite his own. Every sentiment, ineasured by the opision of an opponent, to him appears an exaggeration, and un
candid, while to one of a similar sentiment it looks fair and reasonable. From this consideration, let it be suggested, that, when improprieties appear on either side, every excuse be made, which charity can find, or humanity approve.
Though I have endeavoured to be dictated by that christiap candor and impartiality that well becomes my profession, Mr. Laberee thinks one of my letters so little to the purpose, that, “in justice," I have no claims to an answer from him. He, therefore, gave me to understand particu. larly, that his letter was granted “as a matter of favour,'** and not of justice; for he said, “In justice, you have no claim to any answer from me.” In this letter which was granted me as a matter of favour, or pure grace, without the least colour of justice," that I had merited, or could claim from him, he accuses me of “low criticism, scurrility, play, upon words, and whining about a challenge.” Now what appears the most remarkable in this place, is, that as my opponent thought I had no claim to an answer, and of course: would vot claim any thing in his answer, that the only time he undertook to rouse his benevolence, his favour could not produce things more precious.
I deem it unnecessary to give the reader any more information, concerning what he may expect in the following lelters; as he undoubtedly will choose to make his own conclusions, rather than to learn them from one engaged in the controversy. To the candid and generous reader, the following pages are therefore submitted, with the humble hope, that they may be a mean of enlightening and con: firming many who are in doubt which way to walk.
SAMUEL C. LOVELAND.
To Rey. JOSEPH LABERER.
I now sit down, according to promise, to introduce a friendly correspondence, on the subject of the extensivepess of salvation by Jesus Christ. As professed ministers of his gospel, it appears that we have fallen into considerable difference of sentiment, in relation to the final state of the whole human family. While you openly proclaim, that he who remains a sinner during this mortal existence, must endlessly remain a sufferer during au immortal exist. ence, I preach that all sinners will experience the salvation by Christ, to be universal and free. An attempt to compare these ideas with the standard of divine truth, must, confessedly be conducted with candour and deliberation, to promote our interests in the discovery and belief of the truth. With such a disposition of mind, I hope to be dictated in every sentence, submitted to the candid and fair criticism of an ingenuous opponent.
In pursuing this correspondence, I make, and shall en. deavour to maintain by the scriptures, the following stateinents:
Ist. The design of God is to raise the whole human family, from their defectible state, ultimately, to a state of felicity and true happiness.
2d. The justice of God requires the fulfilmert of this design,