GH First, let GB be equal to E: HD shall be equal to F. Make CK equal to F: and because AG is the same multiple of E +, that CH is of F, and that GB is equal + Hyp. AK to E, and CK to F, therefore AB is the same multiple of E, that Kh is of F: but AB, by C the hypothesis, is the same multiple of E, that CD is of F; therefore KH is the same multiple BD E F of F, that CD is of F; wherefore KH is equal 1 Ax, 5. to CD: take away the common magnitude Ch, then the remainder KC is equal to the remainder HD : but KC is equal + + Constr. to F; therefore HD is equal to F. Next, let GB be a multiple of E: HD shall be the same multiple of F. Make CK the same multiple of F, that GB is of E: and because AG is the same K multiple of Et, that ch is of F, and GB the A * Нур. same multiple of E, that CK is of F, therefore AB is the same multiple of E*, that KH is of F: but AB is the same multiple of Et, that CD is + Hyp. of F; therefore Kh is the same multiple of F, B D E F that cd is of F; wherefore KH is equal * to * 1 Ax. 5. CD: take away CH from both; therefore the remainder KC is equal to the remainder HD: and because GB is the same multiple of E +, that KC is of F, and that KC is equal to HD; + Constr. therefore HD is the same multiple of F, that GB is of E. If, therefore, two magnitudes, &c. Q. E, D. 1 G H . 2. 5. PROPOSITION A. TheoR.-If the first of four magnitudes has the same See N. ratio to the second which the third has lo the fourth, then, if the first be greater than the second, the third is also greater than the fourth; and if equal, equal; if less, less. Take any equimultiples of each of them, as the doubles of each: then, by Def. 5th of this Book, if the double of the first be greater than the double of the second, the double of the third is greater than the double of the fourth : but if the first be greater than the second, the double of the first is greater than the double of the second ; wherefore also the double of the third is greater than the double of the fourth ; therefore the third is greater than the fourth : in like manner, if the first be equal to the second, or less than it, the third can be proved to be equal to the fourth, or less than it. Therefore, if the first, &c. Q. E, D. PROPOSITION B. See N. Theor.-If four magnitudes are proportionals, they are pro portionals also when taken inversely. Let A be to B, as C is to D: then also inversely B shall be to A, as D to C. Take of B and D, any equimultiples whatever E and F; and of A and C, any equimultiples whatever G and H. First, let E be greater than G, then G is less than E: and + Hyp because t A is to B as C is to D, and of A and c the first and third, G and H are equimultiples; GABE * 5 Def. 5. fore H is * less than F; that is, F is greater than ICDF H; if, therefore, E be greater than G, F is greater be shewn to be equal to H; and if less, less; but E, + Constr. F are any equimultiples + whatever of B and D, and G, H any * 5 Def. 5. whatever of A and C; therefore + as B is to A, so is D to C. Therefore, if four magnitudes, &c. Q. E. D. PROPOSITION C. See N. THEOR.-If the first be the same multiple of the second, or the same part of it, that the third is of the fourth, the first is to the second, as the third is to the fourth. Let the first A be the same multiple of the second B, that the third c is of the fourth D: A shall be to B as C is to D. Take of A and C, any equimultiples whatever A B C D E and F; and of B and D, any equimultiples ĘG FII whatever G and H: then, because A is the same + multiple of B that C is of D, and that E is the same t multiple of A that F is of C, therefore E is the same multiple of B * that F is of D; that is, E and F are equimultiples of B and D: but G and H are equimultiples t of B and D; therefore, if E be a greater multiple of B, than G is of B, F is a greater multiple of D, than H is of D; that is, if E be greater than G, F is greater than H: in like manner, if E be equal to G, or less than it, F may be shewn to be equal to H, or less than it: but E, F are equimultiples t, any whatever, of A, C; and G, + Constr. H any equimultiples whatever of B, D; therefore + A is to B, + 5 Def. 5. as C is to D. + Hyp + Constr. * 3. 5. + Constr. Next, let the first A be the same part of the second B, that For since A is the same part of B that C is of * B. 5. B, as C is to D. Therefore, if the first be the same multiple, &c. Q. E. D. PROPOSITION D. Theor.-If the first be to the second as the third to the See N. fourth, and if the first be a multiple, or a part of the second; the third is the same multiple, or the same part of the fourth. Let A be to B as C is to D; and first, let A be a multiple of B: C shall be the same multiple of D. Take E equal to A; and whatever multiple A or E is of B, make F the same multiple of D: then, because + A is to B, as C is to D; and of B + Hyp: the second, and D the fourth, equimultiples have A B C D been taken, E and F*; therefore A is to E, as c E * Cor. 4. 5. to F: but A is equal to E, therefore C is equal + Constr. to F: and F is the same f multiple of D, that A + Constr. is of B: therefore c is the same multiple of D See the last that A is of B. figure. Next let A be a part of B: C shall be the same part of D. Because + A is to B, as C is to D; then inversely, B is to † Hyp. A, as D to C: but A is a part + of B, that is, B is a multiple * B. 5. | Hyp. of A; therefore, by the preceding case, D is the same multiple of C; that is, C is the same part of D, that A is of B. Therefore, if the first, &c. Q. E. D. F # A. 5. PROPOSITION VII. magnitude: and the same has the same ratio lo equal mag- Let A and B be equal magnitudes, and C any other: A and B shall each of them have the same ratio to C: and C shall have the same ratio to each of the magnitudes A and B. Take of A and B, any equimultiples whatever D and E; and of c, any multiple whatever F: then, because D is the Constr. same + multiple of A, that E is of B, and that A † Hyp. is equalf to B, therefore D is * equal to E: there* 1 Ax. 5. fore, if d be greater than F, E is greater than F; and if equal, equal ; if less, less ; but D, E + Constr. are any equimultiples of A, B+, and F is any mul- DÁ E B • 5 Def. 5. tiple of C; therefore*, as A is to C, so is B to C. CF Likewise C shall have the same ratio to A, that it has to B. For, having made the same construction, D may, in like manner, be shewn to be equal to E: therefore, if F be greater than D, it is likewise greater than E; and if equal, equal; if less, less : but F is any multiple whatever of C, and D, E are any equimulti* 3 Def. 5. ples whatever of A, B; therefore *, c is to A as C is to B. Therefore, equal magnitudes, &c. Q. E, D. See N. PROPOSITION VIII. greater ratio to any other magnitude than the less has: and Let AB, BC be two unequal magnitudes, of which AB is Ei L K HD Fig. 3. the cases, take H the double of D, K its triple, and so on, till the multiple of d be that which first becomes greater than FG: let L be that multiple of D which is first greater than FG, and K the multiple of D, which is next less than L. Then, because L is the multiple of D which is the first that becomes greater than FG, the next preceding multiple K is not greater than FG; that is, FG is not less than K: and since EF is the same Fig. 2. multiple of Act, that FG is of CB, EU E + Constr. therefore FG is the same multiple of F CB*, that EG is of AB; that is, EG and #1. 5. FG are equimultiples of AB and CB: F A and since it was shewn, that FG is not GB CH less than K, and, by the construction, LKHD GB EF is greater than D, therefore the L K D whole EG is greater than K and D together: but K together with D is equal † to L; therefore EG is greater + Constr, than L: but FG is not greater † than + Constr. L: and EG, FG were proved to be equimultiples of AB, BC; and L is at multiple of D; therefore * AB has to D a greater + Constr. ratio, than BC has to D. 7 Def. 5. Also, D shall have to BC a greater ratio than it has to AB. For having made the same construction, it may be shewn, in like manner, that L is greater than FG, but that it is not greater than EG: and L is a + multiple of D; and FG, EG + Constr. were proved to be equimultiples of CB, AB; therefore D has to CB a greater ratio * than it has to AB. Wherefore, of two 7 Def. 5. unequal magnitudes, &c. Q. E, D, ! PROPOSITION IX. THEOR.—Magnitudes which have the same ratio to the same See N. magnitude, are equal to one another : and those to which the same magnitude has the same ratio, are equal to one another. Let A, B have each of them the same ratio to C: A shall be equal to B. For, if they are not equal, one of them must be greater than the other ; let A be the greater: then, by what was shewn in the preceding proposition, there are some equi. multiples of A and B, and some multiple of C, such, that the I |