Page images
PDF
EPUB
[ocr errors]

I can and will punish you without inquiry. I admit, that if his will is the law, he may take the charge before punishment, or the punishment before the charge, or he may punish without making any charge. If his will is the law, all I have been saying amounts to nothing. But I have endeavoured to let your Lordships see, that in no country upon the earth is the will of a despot, law. It may produce wicked, flagitious, tyrannical acts, but in no country is it law.

The duty of a sovereign in cases of rebellion, as laid down in the Hedaia, agrees with the general practice in India. It was usual, except in cases of notorious injustice and oppression, whenever a rebellion or a suspicion of a rebellion existed, to admonish the rebellious party and persuade him to return to his duty. Causes of complaint were removed and misunderstandings explained, and, to save the effusion of blood, severe measures were not adopted until they were rendered indispensable. This wise and provident law is or ought to be the law in all countries; it was in fact, the law in that country, but Mr. Hastings did not attend to it. His unfortunate victim was goaded to revolt and driven from his subjects, although he endeavoured by message after message to reconcile this cruel tyrant to him. He is told in-reply, You have shed the blood of Englishmen, and

[blocks in formation]

I will never be reconciled to you. Your Lordships will observe, that the reason he gives for such an infernal determination (for it cannot be justly qualified by any other word) is of a nature to make tyranny the very foundation of our government. I do not say here upon what occasion people may or may not resist: but surely, if ever there was an occasion on which people, from love to their sovereign and regard to their country, might take up arms, it was this. They saw a tyrant violent in his demands, and weak in his power. They saw their prince imprisoned and insulted, after he had made every offer of submission, and had laid his turban three times in the lap of his oppressor. They saw him, instead of availing himself of the means he possessed of cutting off his adversary, (for the life of Mr. Hastings was entirely in his power,) betaking himself to flight. They then thronged round him, took up arms in his defence, and shed the blood of some of his insulters. Is this resistance so excited, so provoked, a plea for irreconcileable vengeance?

I must beg pardon for having omitted to lay before your Lordships, in its proper place, a most extraordinary paper, which will shew you in what manner judicial inquiries are conducted, upon what grounds charges are made, by what sort of evidence they are supported, and, in short,

to

to what perils the lives and fortunes of men are subjected in that country. This paper is in the printed minutes, page 1608. It was given in agreeably to the retrograde order which they have established in their judicial proceedings. It was produced to prove the truth of a charge of rebellion, which was made some months before the paper in evidence was known to the

accuser.

"To the Honourable Warren Hastings. Sir, 66 -About the month of November last, I com"municated to Mr. Markham, the substance of a conversation said to have passed between

[ocr errors]

66

Rajah Cheit Sing and Saadut Ally, and which "was reported to me by a person in whom I had "some confidence. The mode of communi

cating this intelligence to you, I left entirely "to Mr. Markham. In this conversation, which "was private, the Rajah and Saadut Ally were "said to have talked of Hyder Ally's victory

[ocr errors]

over Colonel Baillie's detachment; to have "agreed that they ought to seize this oppor"tunity of consulting their own interest, and to "have determined to watch the success of

[ocr errors]

Hyder's arms. Some days after this conver"sation was said to have happened, I was in"formed by the same person, that the Rajah "had received a message from one of the Begums at Fyzabad (I think it was from Sujah

[blocks in formation]

"ul Dowlah's widow,) advising him to comply "with the demands of government, and en"couraging him to expect support in case of "his resisting. This also, I believe, I commu"nicated to Mr. Markham, but not being per"fectly certain, I now think it my duty to re"move the possibility of your remaining unac"quainted with a circumstance, which may not "be unconnected with the present conduct of "the Rajah."

Here then is evidence of evidence given to Mr. Markham by Mr. Balfour, from Lucknow, in the month of November 1781, long after the transaction at Benares. But what was this evidence: I communicate, he says, the subject of "a conversation said to have passed." Observe, said, not a conversation that had passed to his knowledge or recollection; but what his informant said had passed. He adds, this conversation was reported to him by a person whom he won't name, but in whom, he says, he had some confidence. This anonymous person, in whom he had put some confidence, was not himself present at the conversation. He only reports to him, that it was said by somebody else, that such a conversation had taken place. This conversation, which somebody told Colonel Balfour he had heard, was said by somebody to have taken place, if true, related to matters of great importance;

importance; still the mode of its communication was left to Mr. Markham, and that gentleman did not bring it forward till some months after. Colonel Balfour proceeds to say. "Some days "after this conversation was said to have happened," (your Lordships will observe, it is always, was said to have happened,')" I was "informed by the same person, that the Rajah "had received a message from one of the

[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]
[ocr errors]

Begums at Fyzabad, (I think it was from

Sujah ul Dowlah's widow) advising him not "to comply with the demands of government, "and encouraging him to expect support in case "of his resisting." He next adds, "this also "I believe," (observe, he says he is not quite sure of it) "I communicated to Mr. Markman, "but not being perfectly certain," (of a matter the immediate knowledge of which, if true, was of the highest importance to his country) "I now think it my duty to remove the possibility of your remaining unacquainted with a "circumstance, which may not be unconnected "with the present conduct of the Rajah."

66

Here is a man that comes with information long after the fact deposed to, and after having left to another the communication of his intelligence to the proper authority, that other neglects the matter. No letter of Mr. Markham's appears, communicating any such conversation

to

« PreviousContinue »